A woman buried in China in the Bronze Age era

AYIM22BN
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
AYIM22BN
Date:
2850 BCE - 2650 BCE
Biological Sex:
Female
mtDNA:
T2d1a
Y-DNA:
Not applicable
Cultural Period:
Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Ayituohan, Xinjiang, China
Location
Country:
China
Locality:
Xinjiang. Ayituohan
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Afanasievo culture is an archaeological culture of the early Bronze Age, primarily located in the Altai Mountains and the Yenisei River region, and it dates from approximately 3300 to 2500 BCE. Historically, it has been associated with the early Indo-European migrations into the eastern steppes of Eurasia. Recently, archaeological and genetic research has shown that this culture extended into parts of what is now Xinjiang, China, where the Ayituohan culture is identified.

Geographical Setting

The Ayituohan area within Xinjiang represents an extension of the broader Afanasievo cultural complex. This region is characterized by rugged terrains, including mountainous areas and arid plains, which presented both challenges and opportunities for the Bronze Age societies inhabiting them. The location is strategic, lying along what later became important Silk Road routes, allowing for connections with various cultures.

Material Culture

The Afanasievo culture is noted for its distinctive material artifacts, including ceramics and metalwork. In the Ayituohan context, these artifacts often resemble those found in the Altai-Sayan regions, suggesting strong cultural ties. Pottery from this era is typically simple but functional, characterized by pointed bases, which are suitable for semi-nomadic life. Decoration, when present, is often minimal and geometric.

Metal objects, primarily copper and bronze items such as tools, weapons, and ornaments, indicate an advanced level of metallurgical knowledge. These artifacts point towards a society that was utilizing and possibly producing metal goods, which were crucial for both everyday life and as status symbols in this growing community.

Burial Practices

Afanasievo burial customs reveal important insights into their social structure and beliefs. This culture typically employed kurgans, or burial mounds, which were often accompanied by grave goods. These mounds were built in stone-lined chambers, indicating a mix of nomadic and settled elements in their lifestyle. Burials often included pottery, weapons, and personal adornments, which suggest beliefs in an afterlife where such items could be needed.

The graves at Ayituohan show similarities with the broader Afanasievo customs, suggesting a continuation of these practices even as the culture spread geographically. This indicates strong cultural continuity, and possibly the importance of maintaining cultural identity across different environments.

Economy and Subsistence

The Afanasievo were primarily pastoralists, relying heavily on cattle, sheep, and horses for subsistence. The presence of horse remains suggests that they were among the early cultures to domesticate the horse, which was crucial for their mobility and the transport of goods. In the Ayituohan region, hunting and gathering would have supplemented their diet, with evidence pointing to the utilisation of natural resources like local flora and game.

Social Structure

The social organization of the Afanasievo culture, while not entirely understood, is thought to have been clan-based with a mix of egalitarian and hierarchical elements. The presence of differentiated grave goods implies some level of social stratification. Warfare and trade likely played significant roles in social dynamics, especially given their mobility and connections with adjacent regions.

Genetic and Cultural Legacy

Genetic studies indicate that the Afanasievo people were closely related to other early Indo-Europeans, sharing many genetic markers with populations further west, like those of the Yamnaya culture. This suggests that they played a significant role in the spread of Indo-European languages across Eurasia.

Culturally, the Afanasievo influence is noted in subsequent civilizations throughout Central Asia. Their presence in Xinjiang, particularly in Ayituohan, potentially acted as a catalyst for further cultural syncretism as the region later became a melting pot for various Eurasian influences through the Silk Road links.

Conclusion

The Ayituohan manifestation of the Afanasievo culture in Xinjiang represents a fascinating intersection of geography, culture, and history. As early Eurasian nomads, they set a foundation for subsequent interactions and cultural developments in the region, playing a part in the grand narrative of human history through their movements and exchanges across ancient Eurasia. Their legacy, observed through archaeological and genetic evidence, highlights the intricate network of prehistoric migrations and cultural transmissions that shaped the vast landscapes of Central Asia and beyond.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
XHM100 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 1882 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
XHM110 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2050 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
XHM135 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 1918 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
XHM75 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2050 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
AYIM22BY Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Ayituohan, Xinjiang, China 2844 BCE Xinjiang. Ayituohan, China View
AYIM22BN Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Ayituohan, Xinjiang, China 2850 BCE Xinjiang. Ayituohan, China View
SSGM16 Xinjiang Bronze Age 2864 BCE Xinjiang. Songshugou, China View
G218M5-2 Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Nileke, Xinjiang, China 2910 BCE Xinjiang. Nileke, China View
G218M5-3N Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Nileke, Xinjiang, China 3008 BCE Xinjiang. Nileke, China View
GMGM1 Bronze Age Beifang Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2129 BCE Xinjiang. Beifang, China View
11KBM1 Bronze Age Beifang Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 1874 BCE Xinjiang. Beifang, China View
L5209 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2050 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
L5213 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2050 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
L4964 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2050 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
L6101 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 1767 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
L6103 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 1785 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
L6105 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2050 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
L6106 Bronze Age Xiaohe, Xinjiang, China 2050 BCE Xinjiang. Xiaohe, China View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
C2034 Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Ayituohan, Xinjiang, China 2624 BCE Xinjiang. Aletai (Altay) Region. Habahe County. Ayituohan, China View
C2035 Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Ayituohan, Xinjiang, China 2624 BCE Xinjiang. Aletai Region. Habahe County. Ayituohan, China View
AYIM22BY Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Ayituohan, Xinjiang, China 2844 BCE Xinjiang. Ayituohan, China View
AYIM22BN Bronze Age Afanasievo Culture Ayituohan, Xinjiang, China 2850 BCE Xinjiang. Ayituohan, China View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (AYIM22BN) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Western Steppe Pastoralists 49%
European Hunter-Gatherers 18%
Neolithic Farmers 15%
Ancient Asians 14%
Ancient Native Americans 5%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (AYIM22BN) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 63%
Eastern European 48%
Eastern European 47.9%
Northwestern European 15%
English 7.5%
Finnish 5.7%
Scandinavian 1.6%
Asia 29%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 22%
Pakistan 21.9%
Northern West Asian 7%
Caucasian 7.3%
America 8%
America 8%
Native American 7.9%
Africa 0%
African Hunter-Gatherer 0%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample AYIM22BN are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

AYIM22BN,0.10627736,0.0197462,0.03768712,0.06519454,-0.02327846,0.01901124,-0.01115836,-0.01366398,-0.01309576,-0.02954922,0.00470346,-0.00520756,0.0093916,-0.00576414,-0.00429826,-0.00679402,-0.00933232,-0.003049,-0.0080559,-0.01077054,-0.00230254,0.00330676,-0.0114877,0.00335344,-0.00494412
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies
Authors:
Zhang F, Ning C, Scott A
Abstract:

The identity of the earliest inhabitants of Xinjiang, in the heart of Inner Asia, and the languages that they spoke have long been debated and remain contentious1. Here we present genomic data from 5 individuals dating to around 3000-2800 BC from the Dzungarian Basin and 13 individuals dating to around 2100-1700 BC from the Tarim Basin, representing the earliest yet discovered human remains from North and South Xinjiang, respectively. We find that the Early Bronze Age Dzungarian individuals exhibit a predominantly Afanasievo ancestry with an additional local contribution, and the Early-Middle Bronze Age Tarim individuals contain only a local ancestry. The Tarim individuals from the site of Xiaohe further exhibit strong evidence of milk proteins in their dental calculus, indicating a reliance on dairy pastoralism at the site since its founding. Our results do not support previous hypotheses for the origin of the Tarim mummies, who were argued to be Proto-Tocharian-speaking pastoralists descended from the Afanasievo1,2 or to have originated among the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex3 or Inner Asian Mountain Corridor cultures4. Instead, although Tocharian may have been plausibly introduced to the Dzungarian Basin by Afanasievo migrants during the Early Bronze Age, we find that the earliest Tarim Basin cultures appear to have arisen from a genetically isolated local population that adopted neighbouring pastoralist and agriculturalist practices, which allowed them to settle and thrive along the shifting riverine oases of the Taklamakan Desert.

Save 85% coupon: DISCOUNT85

Valid until July 24 2025