Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

C1A2A1

Y-DNA Haplogroup C1A2A1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig C1A2A1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup C1A2A1 is a downstream branch of C1A2A (C‑V20), itself a western‑Eurasian branch of haplogroup C that appears in the European Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic record. Based on its phylogenetic position beneath C1A2A and the temporal depth of related C‑V20 lineages in ancient DNA, C1A2A1 most plausibly arose in Western Eurasia during or soon after the Last Glacial Maximum (approx. ~16 thousand years ago). The lineage shows a pattern consistent with an early founding in Europe followed by severe reduction in frequency due to later population turnovers, drift, and founder effects.

Genetically, C1A2A1 is characterized by a small number of defining SNPs downstream of C‑V20; because the clade is rare, much of what is known comes from sparse ancient samples and occasional modern singletons. Limited downstream diversity suggests long‑term persistence at low effective population size rather than recent expansion.

Subclades (if applicable)

At present, C1A2A1 is treated as an intermediate/terminal branch in many phylogenies with few well‑defined downstream subclades. High‑coverage sequencing in larger modern and ancient datasets may reveal additional splits, but currently most detections fall into very small, often singleton lineages derived from C1A2A1 or sit very close to it. Because of this, many reported instances are either direct placements on C1A2A1 or on minimally branched downstream markers.

Geographical Distribution

The geographic signal for C1A2A1 is strongly west Eurasian and fragmentary. It is most clearly detected in Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic contexts in Europe, with subsequent survival at very low frequencies in some modern Western and Southern European populations. Reports from Central and Northern Europe exist but are rare and scattered. Outside Europe, detections are exceptional and typically traceable to historical admixture, recent migration, or low‑confidence singletons in small surveys.

The distribution reflects a pattern seen for several ancient European relict haplogroups: presence in early European foragers, followed by contraction and near‑disappearance as Neolithic farmers and later Bronze Age processes reshaped Y‑chromosome landscapes.

Historical and Cultural Significance

While C1A2A1 is not associated with major demographic expansions in the Holocene, its importance is primarily archaeogenetic: it serves as a marker of deep Paleolithic and Mesolithic paternal ancestry within Europe. Where it appears in ancient remains it helps reconstruct pre‑Neolithic population structure and migration corridors. In modern populations the haplogroup is so rare that it seldom has a direct cultural signature, but its persistence in isolated individuals or small groups illustrates the complex ancestry of Europe, including survival of ancient lineages through bottlenecks and local continuity.

Co‑analysis with maternal haplogroups (often U‑lineages in Mesolithic contexts) and other Y haplogroups typical of European foragers (e.g., I2) provides a coherent picture of hunter‑gatherer genetic profiles prior to and during the early Neolithic.

Conclusion

C1A2A1 is a classic example of a relict, low‑frequency European Y‑chromosome lineage: phylogenetically informative about Upper Paleolithic/Mesolithic population structure but not a major contributor to later demographic transformations. Ongoing ancient DNA sampling and deeper sequencing of rare modern lineages are the most likely routes to improve resolution of C1A2A1’s internal structure and to clarify any cryptic subclades.

Notes on interpretation: because records are sparse, frequencies and exact geographic limits are sensitive to sampling bias. Any modern detection should be interpreted within a context of limited diversity and potential single‑sample artifacts, and ideally confirmed by high‑coverage sequencing and comparison to ancient reference panels.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis C1A2A1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 C1A2A1 Aktuell ~16,000 years ago Mesolithic 16,000 Jahre 0 1 0
2 C1A2A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 2 0
3 C1A2 ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 2 53 0
4 C1A ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 56 2
5 C1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 92 0
6 C ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 3 406 35

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Western Eurasia (Europe)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup C1A2A1 is found include:

  1. Ancient European Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic hunter-gatherers
  2. Modern Western European populations (very low frequency, sporadic)
  3. Modern Southern European populations (very low frequency, sporadic)
  4. Scattered occurrences in Central and Northern Europe (rare reports)
  5. Rare, isolated detections associated with historical admixture or diaspora outside Europe

Regionale Präsenz

Western Europe Low
Southern Europe Low
Central/Eastern Europe Low
Western Asia Low
North Africa Low
Northern Europe Very Low
West Asia Very Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  2. ~16k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe C1A2A1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig C1A2A1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu C1A2A1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Anatolian Epipaleolithic Bodrogkeresztur Malak Preslavets Culture Medieval Italian Pavlovian Culture Solutrean Spain_Camino_de_las_Yeseras_MigrationPeriod_Visigoth Sunghir Culture Trypillia Culture Turkey_Catalhoyuk_EN
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-15
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.