Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

G2

Y-DNA Haplogroup G2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig G2

Origins and Evolution

Haplogroup G2 is a primary descendant branch of Y-DNA haplogroup G (M201). Based on phylogenetic placement and mutation rate-calibrated age estimates, G2 likely diverged from other G lineages in the Late Upper Paleolithic, roughly ~25 kya, within the Near East/Caucasus region where haplogroup G shows its greatest diversity today. The lineage persisted locally through the Epipaleolithic and became a major component of the male gene pool of early farming populations during the early Holocene.

Ancient DNA (aDNA) studies have repeatedly recovered G2a (a dominant G2 subclade) among early Neolithic farmers in Anatolia and Europe, supporting a scenario in which G2 lineages were carried westward with the spread of agriculture from Anatolian/Levantine source populations into southeastern and central Europe during the early Neolithic (roughly 9–7 kya). Later population movements (for example Bronze Age steppe expansions) reduced the relative frequency of G2 in many parts of Europe, though localized high frequencies persist in some areas.

Subclades

  • G2a: The most historically and archaeogenetically prominent subclade; strongly associated with Neolithic farmer remains across Anatolia and Europe and with modern pockets in Mediterranean and southern European populations (e.g., Sardinians, parts of Italy and France). G2a diversified substantially around the onset of the Neolithic (~10–12 kya) and includes many downstream branches with regional structure.
  • G2b / G-M377 (and other minor branches): Rarer, more regionally scattered branches found at low frequencies in parts of the Near East, the Caucasus, and among some Jewish paternal lineages (including specific Ashkenazi and Sephardi lineages). These subclades often show more limited geographic ranges and lower diversity than G2a.
  • Other localized G2 branches: Several minor G2 lineages are documented in Iran, the broader Near East, the Caucasus, and Central Asia; these reflect long-term continuity in the source region as well as later localized expansions and drift.

Geographical Distribution

G2 shows a concentration of diversity and deep branches in the Caucasus and adjacent Near East, consistent with a long-term presence there. From that core area, G2 lineages — especially G2a — spread with early farming expansions into Anatolia and Europe. Modern distributions are characterized by:

  • High/relatively high frequencies and diversity in the Caucasus and parts of the Near East (Georgia, Armenia, eastern Turkey, some North Caucasus groups).
  • Moderate presence in southern Europe and Mediterranean islands (notably Sardinia), reflecting substantial Neolithic ancestry in those regions and subsequent isolation or drift.
  • Low to moderate frequencies in other parts of Europe and the Near East and scattered low-frequency occurrences in Iran, Central Asia, and North Africa.

Ancient DNA demonstrates that G2 (particularly G2a) was common among early farmers of the Linearbandkeramik (LBK), Cardial/Impressed Ware, and Anatolian Neolithic cultures but later declined in frequency in many regions following Bronze Age migrations.

Historical and Cultural Significance

  • Neolithic farming expansion: G2a is one of the hallmark paternal markers of early Neolithic farmer populations that expanded out of Anatolia into Europe, appearing in numerous aDNA samples from early village farming communities. This association links G2 lineages to the spread of agriculture, sedentism, and associated cultural packages across southeastern and central Europe.
  • Caucasus/Near Eastern continuity: The high diversity of G2 in the Caucasus and parts of the Near East points to long-term regional continuity and in situ differentiation, making G2 useful for studying prehistoric population structure in that area.
  • Jewish paternal lineages and regional lineages: Certain rarer G2 branches are found in some Jewish communities and in regionally restricted lineages in Iran/Central Asia, illustrating how G2 lineages were incorporated into diverse local histories.

Conclusion

Haplogroup G2 is an informative intermediate clade within haplogroup G that bridges Upper Paleolithic Near Eastern origins with a clear Neolithic expansion signal into Europe. Its pattern — high regional diversity in the Caucasus/Near East combined with targeted Neolithic-era dispersals (especially of G2a) and later reduction in many regions — makes G2 an important marker for reconstructing the demography of early farmers and the prehistoric population landscape of western Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis G2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 G2 Aktuell ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 989 9
2 G ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 3 1,171 7

Geschwisterzweige (2)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Near East / Caucasus

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup G2 is found include:

  1. Caucasus populations (e.g., Georgians, some North Caucasus groups)
  2. Anatolian and Near Eastern populations (Turkey, parts of the Levant)
  3. Early European farmer-descended groups and modern Southern/Western Europeans (e.g., Sardinians, some Mediterranean populations)
  4. Iranian and Central Asian groups (notably for some G branches such as G1 and localized G2 lineages)
  5. Jewish communities (occurring in some Ashkenazi and Sephardi paternal lines)

Regionale Präsenz

Caucasus High
Near East / Anatolia High
Western & Mediterranean Europe Moderate
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
North Africa Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Caucasus & Near East High
Southern Europe / Mediterranean Moderate
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~25k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe G2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig G2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu G2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Alföld Linear Pottery Anatolian Neolithic Bell Beaker Ikiztepe Linear Pottery Culture Los Millares Pottery Neolithic Shanidar Culture Turkey_Catalhoyuk_EN Turkey_Catalhoyuk_LN Turkey_Catalhoyuk_MN Turkey_Catalhoyuk_N
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
Referenzprofil

Probencatalog

9 Subkladen-Träger der Haplogruppe G2 (keine direkten Träger in der aktuellen Referenzauswahl)

9 angezeigt · 9 passende Proben

Porträts sind KI-generierte Illustrationen. Probenbezeichnungen und Zugangs-IDs identifizieren die Referenzdatensätze.

Porträt Probe Land Epoche Datum Kultur Y-DNA Übereinstimmung
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von Alt Inden Early Medieval individual, North Rhine-Westphalia. Alt-Inden, Germany (400-800 CE)
Proben-ID: IND001
Germany Saxon Early Medieval Alt Inden, Germany 400-800 CE Saxon Culture G2a2b2a1a1b1a2a1a Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von Alt Inden Early Medieval individual, North Rhine-Westphalia. Alt-Inden, Germany (400-800 CE)
Proben-ID: IND008
Germany Saxon Early Medieval Alt Inden, Germany 400-800 CE Saxon Culture G2a2b2a1a1b1a2a1a Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von MBA individual, Osijek. Jagodnjak-Krcevine, Croatia (1,800-1,600 BCE)
Proben-ID: JAG58
Croatia Middle Bronze Age Jagodnjak, Croatia 1800-1600 BCE Jagodnjak Culture G2a2a1a2a2a1-Z31430 Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von MBA individual, Osijek. Jagodnjak-Krcevine, Croatia (1,800-1,600 BCE)
Proben-ID: JAG78
Croatia Middle Bronze Age Jagodnjak, Croatia 1800-1600 BCE Jagodnjak Culture G2a2a1a2a2a1-Z31430 Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von MBA individual, Osijek. Jagodnjak-Krcevine, Croatia (1,800-1,600 BCE)
Proben-ID: JAG82
Croatia Middle Bronze Age Jagodnjak, Croatia 1800-1600 BCE Jagodnjak Culture G2a2a1-PF3148 Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von MBA individual, Osijek. Jagodnjak-Krcevine, Croatia (1,876-1,687 BCE)
Proben-ID: JAG34
Croatia Middle Bronze Age Jagodnjak, Croatia 1876-1687 calBCE (3445±20 BP, UCIAMS-233509;PSU-6011) Jagodnjak Culture G2a2a1a2a2a1-Z31430 Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von Veneto individual, Vicenza. Berici Hills. Grottina dei Covoloni del Broion, Italy (3,355-3,028 BCE)
Proben-ID: BRC022
Italy Copper Age Broion, Italy 3355-3028 calBCE (4489±41 BP, UBA-41611) Broion G2a3-F1193 Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von MN individual, Osijek. Beli Manastir-Popova zemlja, Croatia (4,603-4,453 BCE)
Proben-ID: POP33
Croatia Middle Neolithic Popova Culture 4603-4453 calBCE (5529±99 BP, Z-5732) Popova Culture G2a2b2a1a1-PF3345 Subklade
KI-generiertes illustratives Porträt von MN individual, Osijek. Beli Manastir-Popova zemlja, Croatia (4,700-4,300 BCE)
Proben-ID: POP36
Croatia Middle Neolithic Popova Culture 4700-4300 BCE Popova Culture G2a2a-PF3147 Subklade
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Referenzprofil

Trägerverteilungskarte

Geografische Verteilung von 9 antiken DNA-Proben (direkte und Subkladen-Träger von G2)

Subkladen-Träger
Zeitraumfilter
Alle Zeiträume
Alle Proben werden angezeigt
Referenzprofil

Zeitliche Verteilung

Verteilung der Träger über archäologische Epochen

Referenzprofil

Geografische Verteilung

Anzahlen nach erfasstem Probenland. Sie spiegeln die verfügbare Referenzauswahl wider, nicht Bevölkerungshäufigkeiten.

Referenzprofil

Verteilung Land × Epoche

Vergleichen Sie erfasste Probenanzahlen nach Ländern und archäologischen Epochen. Wählen Sie eine belegte Zelle, um eine Probe anzusehen.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-16
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.