Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

H1A1A1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup H1A1A1B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig H1A1A1B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup H1A1A1B is a downstream subclade of H1A1A1, itself part of the broader H paternal lineage that is strongly associated with South Asia. Because this branch sits relatively deep within a regionally concentrated lineage, it likely arose through in situ diversification within the Indian subcontinent rather than representing a major external migration event.

Based on the phylogenetic position of the parent clade, the most reasonable estimate for the formation of H1A1A1B is within the Holocene, probably around the early-to-middle postglacial period. Its distribution pattern is expected to reflect a combination of ancient local persistence, population expansions, and founder effects that shaped many South Asian Y-DNA lineages.

Subclades

As a relatively specific branch, H1A1A1B is part of a lineage that may contain additional downstream private or regionally restricted branches. In practice, many carriers identified at this level may belong to more terminal subclades not yet fully resolved in public phylogenies, especially where sequencing coverage is limited.

The broader phylogenetic context is:

  • H
    • H1
      • H1A
        • H1A1
          • H1A1A
            • H1A1A1
              • H1A1A1B

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be primarily South Asian, with the strongest presence in populations from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. It may also appear at lower frequencies in adjacent West and Central Asian populations due to historical contact, trade, and migration, and in diaspora communities of South Asian origin.

Within South Asia, lineages in the broader H clade are often associated with regional founder effects, and H1A1A1B may therefore be unevenly distributed among linguistic, caste, or tribal groups. Like many subclades in the region, its apparent frequency can vary substantially depending on sampling depth and the use of high-resolution sequencing.

Historical and Cultural Significance

H1A1A1B is not usually tied to a single archaeological culture in the way some Eurasian steppe lineages are, but it is important for understanding the deep paternal history of South Asia. Its distribution is most consistent with long-term demographic processes in the subcontinent, including the growth of local populations during the Neolithic, Chalcolithic, and Bronze Age periods and later historic-era mobility.

The lineage may be informative in studies of:

  • Indigenous South Asian paternal continuity
  • Regional endogamy and founder effects
  • Population structure among tribal and caste groups
  • Diaspora movements linked to South Asian migration

Because H lineages are often discussed in the context of South Asian population history, H1A1A1B contributes to broader questions about how paternal diversity developed across the subcontinent over many millennia.

Regional and Comparative Context

Compared with widespread West Eurasian Y-lineages, H1A1A1B is a more regionally concentrated lineage and is most informative when analyzed alongside other South Asian-associated haplogroups such as L, R2, J2, and H1. Its presence in neighboring regions typically reflects gene flow from South Asia rather than local origin there.

At the population level, this haplogroup may occur at low frequencies in communities with historical connections to South Asia, including Roma-related groups, some Middle Eastern populations, and parts of Central Asia, though these occurrences are usually minor relative to its South Asian core.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup H1A1A1B represents a more derived paternal branch within a distinctly South Asian lineage. Its scientific value lies in tracing fine-scale ancestry, regional continuity, and founder effects across the Indian subcontinent and nearby diaspora populations.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Regional and Comparative Context
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis H1A1A1B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 H1A1A1B Aktuell ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 0 2 0
2 H1A1A1 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 2 3 0
3 H1A1A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 2 53 0
4 H1A1 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 55 0
5 H1A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 103 0
6 H1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 147 1
7 H ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 300 42

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

South Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup H1A1A1B is found include:

  1. South Asian populations, especially groups in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka
  2. Tribal and caste populations across the Indian subcontinent
  3. Some Central Asian and Middle Eastern populations at low frequencies
  4. Roma and related diaspora populations in parts of Europe and West Asia
  5. Populations with historical South Asian admixture in adjacent regions

Regionale Präsenz

South Asia High
Central Asia Low
Southeast Asia Low
Southern Europe Low
Western Europe Low
South Asia High
West Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe H1A1A1B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig H1A1A1B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu H1A1A1B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Barikot Culture Gogdara Culture Gonur Culture Katelai Culture Roopkund Culture Shahr-i Sokhta Turkey_Catalhoyuk_EN Turkey_Catalhoyuk_LN
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.