Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

I1A1B1A2

Y-DNA Haplogroup I1A1B1A2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig I1A1B1A2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup I1A1B1A2 is a downstream subclade of I1A1B1A, itself part of the broader I1 paternal lineage. Haplogroup I1 is one of the characteristic Y-chromosome lineages of northern Europe, and its deep structure is generally interpreted as reflecting post-glacial recolonization of northern latitudes followed by local founder events, drift, and later regional expansion.

As a sub-branch of a localized northern European clade, I1A1B1A2 is expected to have a relatively recent age compared with the parent lineage, likely forming in the Holocene during the period when populations in Scandinavia and adjacent regions became increasingly structured. Its distribution is consistent with an origin in northern Europe, probably within or near Scandinavia, followed by spread into neighboring parts of western, central, and eastern Europe.

Subclades

Because I1A1B1A2 is an intermediate downstream node, it serves as a bridge between its parent branch and more derived terminal lineages. In phylogenetic terms, this kind of clade often represents a localized ancestral male line that expanded within a regional population before being subdivided into more specific descendant branches.

Known or expected descendant diversity for such a clade is usually shaped by:

  • Founder effects in small prehistoric or early historic communities
  • Genetic drift in geographically concentrated populations
  • Regional expansions during the Bronze Age, Iron Age, and medieval periods
  • Modern diaspora spread through European overseas migration

Geographical Distribution

The strongest concentration of I1-derived paternal lineages is in Scandinavia, especially Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, with additional presence in Germany, the Netherlands, the British Isles, and the Baltic region. Downstream branches of I1 also appear in East Slavic, Central European, and Balkan populations, generally at lower frequencies than in Scandinavia but still detectable due to historic gene flow and population movement.

For I1A1B1A2, the most plausible distribution pattern is a high-frequency core in northern Europe and moderate-to-low frequencies in surrounding European regions. This pattern is typical of paternal lineages that expanded from a northern founder population and were later carried farther afield by migration, trade, warfare, and state formation.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Haplogroup I1 and its branches are often discussed in relation to Germanic-speaking populations, Scandinavian expansion, and the formation of medieval northern European societies. While no haplogroup can be assigned exclusively to a single culture, lineages within I1 frequently show association with populations connected to the Nordic Bronze Age, Iron Age, and later Viking Age demographic history.

For this reason, I1A1B1A2 may be found among descendants of historical populations shaped by:

  • Scandinavian settlement and expansion
  • Germanic tribal movements
  • Medieval and early modern northwestern European population structure
  • Overseas diaspora from northern and western Europe to the Americas and Oceania

Its significance lies less in one single archaeological culture and more in what it reveals about the continuity and branching of northern European male ancestry across thousands of years.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup I1A1B1A2 is a downstream northern European paternal lineage most plausibly rooted in post-glacial Europe and refined by later Holocene founder effects. Its distribution and phylogenetic position indicate strongest ties to Scandinavia and nearby northwestern Europe, with broader presence across Europe and in modern diaspora populations due to historic migration.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis I1A1B1A2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 I1A1B1A2 Aktuell ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 I1A1B1A ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 4 65 6
3 I1A1B1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 3 193 0
4 I1A1B ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 326 22
5 I1A1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 3 410 0
6 I1A ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 5 854 16
7 I1 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 3 1,315 2
8 I ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 4 3,486 79

Geschwisterzweige (3)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Northern Europe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup I1A1B1A2 is found include:

  1. Scandinavians
  2. Germans, Austrians, and Dutch populations
  3. British and Irish populations
  4. Baltic populations
  5. East Slavic populations
  6. Central European populations
  7. Balkan populations
  8. Recent diaspora populations in the Americas and Australia

Regionale Präsenz

Northern Europe (Scandinavia) High
British Isles & Western Europe Moderate
Northern Germany / Netherlands Moderate
Baltic States and Poland Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Southern Europe Low
Australia and New Zealand Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~8k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe I1A1B1A2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig I1A1B1A2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu I1A1B1A2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

England_Cambridgeshire_Medieval Norse Pre-Viking Swedish Viking Viking Culture Viking Denmark
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.