Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

I1A3A1A2

Y-DNA Haplogroup I1A3A1A2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig I1A3A1A2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup I1A3A1A2 is a subclade of I1, one of the major paternal lineages associated with northern Europe. As a downstream branch of I1A3A1A, it is best understood as a relatively recent, regionally structured lineage that likely formed through founder effects and subsequent local expansion in northern or northwestern Europe.

Because it sits several steps below the broader I1 trunk, this haplogroup most likely reflects the demographic processes that shaped Europe after the last glacial period: population resettlement, local isolation, and later population growth during the Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age, and medieval periods. Its exact phylogenetic age may be somewhat younger than its parent clade, but in the absence of direct ancient-DNA sampling for this specific branch, an approximate origin in the mid-Holocene is the most reasonable inference.

Subclades

As a highly specific terminal or near-terminal branch, I1A3A1A2 may contain only a small number of currently identified downstream branches, depending on testing resolution and future phylogenetic updates. In many Y-DNA trees, such fine-grained subclades are best interpreted as lineage clusters rather than large deep population divisions.

Key implications of this structure include:

  • Localized ancestry signal: often tied to a particular ancestral male line or regional founder.
  • Recent branching: likely younger than the broader I1 macro-lineage by many millennia.
  • Sampling sensitivity: apparent rarity may partly reflect limited high-resolution sequencing.

Geographical Distribution

The broader parent lineage I1A3A1A is reported among Scandinavian, northern German, British and Irish, Baltic, East Slavic, Balkan, and central European populations, and I1A3A1A2 would be expected to occur mainly within that same northern and central European genetic landscape, typically at low frequencies.

Its strongest likelihood of presence is in populations with substantial historical I1 enrichment, especially:

  • Scandinavians and other northern Europeans
  • Northern Germans and adjacent Central European groups
  • British and Irish populations
  • Baltic populations
  • East Slavic populations with northern European admixture
  • Diaspora communities in the Americas and Australia

The present distribution is likely shaped by a combination of medieval mobility, Viking-era dispersals, Hanseatic and trade-network movement, military colonization, and modern migration.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although no single archaeological culture can be assigned with confidence to I1A3A1A2 specifically, the broader I1 lineage is often discussed in relation to post-glacial recolonization of northern Europe and later expansions associated with northern European populations.

For this downstream branch, the most plausible cultural and historical associations are indirect and should be treated cautiously:

  • Corded Ware and related northern and northeastern European expansions, as part of the wider I1 context in Europe
  • Bronze Age and Iron Age mobility networks that structured male-line drift and founder effects
  • Viking Age and medieval Scandinavian-linked dispersals in some descendant lines

The haplogroup is therefore most significant as a marker of regional paternal continuity rather than a diagnostic signature of a single culture.

Conclusion

I1A3A1A2 is a fine-scale paternal lineage within the northern European I1 tree, probably formed in the mid-Holocene and carried forward by localized founder events and subsequent mobility. Its modern distribution is expected to be concentrated in northern and northwestern Europe, with limited but recognizable presence in diaspora populations descended from those regions.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis I1A3A1A2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 I1A3A1A2 Aktuell ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 1 0 0
2 I1A3A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 Jahre 2 6 0
3 I1A3A1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,500 Jahre 1 13 0
4 I1A3A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 7,500 Jahre 1 39 0
5 I1A3 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,500 Jahre 2 68 0
6 I1A ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 5 854 16
7 I1 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 3 1,315 2
8 I ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 4 3,486 79

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Northern Europe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup I1A3A1A2 is found include:

  1. Scandinavians
  2. Northern Germans and Austrians
  3. British and Irish populations
  4. Baltic populations
  5. East Slavic populations
  6. Balkan populations
  7. Central European populations
  8. Recent diaspora populations in the Americas and Australia

Regionale Präsenz

Northern Europe (Scandinavia) High
Western Europe (British Isles, Netherlands, N. Germany) Moderate
Eastern Europe / Baltic Low
Southern Europe Low
North America Low
Central Europe Moderate
Australia and New Zealand Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~4.5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe I1A3A1A2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig I1A3A1A2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu I1A3A1A2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Anglo-Saxon Avar Avar Culture Danish Medieval Denmark_OustrupTaderupmose_PreImperialRoman Early Árpád Early Byzantine Langobard Norse Greenland Saxon Liebenau
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.