Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

I2A1A2B1A1A2C

Y-DNA Haplogroup I2A1A2B1A1A2C

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig I2A1A2B1A1A2C

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup I2A1A2B1A1A2C is a deeply nested paternal lineage within haplogroup I2, one of the major European Y-chromosome branches ultimately associated with Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Because this lineage sits far downstream from the main I2 trunk, it is expected to have arisen relatively recently in genealogical terms, most likely during the Holocene, in a southeastern European setting where I2 diversity is especially concentrated.

The broader I2 clade is strongly linked to pre-Neolithic European male lineages, and its highest diversity and many rare descendant branches are found in the Balkans and surrounding regions. For a subclade as specific as I2A1A2B1A1A2C, the most plausible interpretation is that it emerged from a localized founder event within a regional population already carrying the parent lineage, followed by very limited expansion.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal branch of I2A1A2B1A1A2, this haplogroup likely has few or no widely documented downstream branches in public phylogenies. Its value in genetic genealogy is therefore mainly as a marker of a very recent and localized paternal descent line rather than as a broad population-defined haplogroup.

Within the broader I2 family, it belongs to a continuum of Balkan-associated lineages that include other rare branches of I2a. Comparative interpretation is most informative when used alongside other deeply structured Balkan I2 lineages rather than in isolation.

Geographical Distribution

Modern occurrences of I2A1A2B1A1A2C are expected to be extremely rare, with the highest likelihood of detection in Southeastern Europe, especially the Balkans. Because it is a rare downstream branch, any presence outside the Balkans is more likely to reflect recent migration, diaspora movement, or limited historical gene flow than ancient wide-scale dispersal.

In population-genetic terms, this kind of distribution pattern is typical of lineages that persisted through regional continuity and bottlenecked into small lineages with little broad demographic expansion. If found in Central or Western Europe, it would usually represent isolated genealogical events rather than a major historical signal.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The deeper I2 paternal background is often discussed in relation to Mesolithic hunter-gatherer continuity in Europe, and in the Balkans specifically it may reflect survival of older European lineages through the Neolithic transition and later population turnovers. However, for a very downstream subclade such as I2A1A2B1A1A2C, direct assignment to a specific prehistoric culture is usually not possible without ancient DNA evidence.

Its historical significance lies more in what it reveals about regional persistence, founder effects, and local paternal micro-lineages than in association with a single archaeological culture. In practice, lineages like this can be important for reconstructing deep Balkan demographic history, particularly when paired with ancient and modern comparative datasets.

Conclusion

I2A1A2B1A1A2C is best understood as a rare, localized Balkan-descended subclade of European haplogroup I2. It reflects the long continuity and fragmentation of paternal lineages in southeastern Europe, with a likely origin in the Holocene Balkans and only limited spread beyond that core region.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis I2A1A2B1A1A2C. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 I2A1A2B1A1A2C Aktuell ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 0 4 0
2 I2A1A2B1A1A2 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 6 0
3 I2A1A2B1A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 Jahre 4 18 1
4 I2A1A2B1A1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,500 Jahre 1 46 0
5 I2A1A2B1A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 1 46 1
6 I2A1A2B1 ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 1 50 0
7 I2A1A2B ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 145 0
8 I2A1A2 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 2 414 0
9 I2A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 720 39
10 I2A1 ~16,000 years ago Mesolithic 16,000 Jahre 2 933 0
11 I2A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 1,551 24
12 I2 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 1,785 10
13 I ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 4 3,486 79

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Southeastern Europe, likely the Balkans

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup I2A1A2B1A1A2C is found include:

  1. Balkan populations
  2. East Slavic populations
  3. Central European populations
  4. Scandinavian populations
  5. German and Austrian populations
  6. British and Irish populations
  7. Baltic populations
  8. Recent diaspora populations in the Americas and Australia

Regionale Präsenz

Southeastern Europe High
Central Europe (bordering Balkans) Moderate
Southern Europe (Mediterranean islands/Italy) Low
Western Europe Low
Southeastern Europe High
Eastern Europe Low
Northern Europe Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~4.5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe I2A1A2B1A1A2C

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig I2A1A2B1A1A2C

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu I2A1A2B1A1A2C. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Austria_Avar Croatian Medieval Denmark_Kalmargarden_EarlyMedieval Gorokhovets Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Magyar Elite Culture Viking Viking Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.