Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

J2A1A1A2B2A1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A1B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig J2A1A1A2B2A1B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A1B is a very rare terminal branch within J2a, one of the major paternal lineages of West Eurasia. Based on its phylogenetic position, it almost certainly derives from a Near Eastern ancestral population and represents a lineage that survived through repeated demographic bottlenecks rather than undergoing a large-scale expansion.

The parent clade J2A1A1A2B2A1 is already described as a narrow, low-frequency branch tied to the Levant, Anatolia, Mesopotamia, the Caucasus, the Iranian plateau, and parts of the Arabian Peninsula. As a descendant of that clade, J2A1A1A2B2A1B is expected to be even more restricted geographically and to have a very recent coalescence time relative to the broader J2a phylogeny. A plausible origin timeframe is around 3 thousand years ago, though the lineage may preserve ancestry from older Near Eastern population layers.

Subclades

As a downstream subclade, J2A1A1A2B2A1B may have few or no widely documented internal branches in public summaries, which is typical for extremely rare Y-DNA lineages. In practice, such branches are often identified primarily through high-resolution sequencing rather than broad population surveys.

Its phylogenetic relationship can be summarized as:

  • J2a → broader West Asian paternal lineage
  • J2A1A1A2B2A1 → rare Near Eastern sublineage
  • J2A1A1A2B2A1B → very rare terminal descendant branch

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to occur at very low frequency in populations from the Near East and adjacent regions, especially where the parent clade is already known to be present. The strongest expectations are for localized occurrences in:

  • Levantine populations
  • Anatolian populations
  • Caucasus populations
  • Mesopotamian populations
  • Iranian plateau populations
  • Arabian Peninsula populations
  • Jewish populations
  • Southeastern European populations

Because of its rarity, its presence in any one region may reflect founder effects, historical mobility, or lineage persistence in small communities rather than high background frequency.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Broader J2a lineages are often associated with the spread and persistence of Neolithic farming societies, later Bronze Age and Iron Age population movements, and long-term continuity across the eastern Mediterranean and Southwest Asia. For a highly specific branch such as J2A1A1A2B2A1B, the most defensible interpretation is not a single famous archaeological culture, but rather regional continuity within Near Eastern and eastern Mediterranean populations.

Possible historical contexts include:

  • Neolithic and post-Neolithic Near Eastern demographic layering
  • Bronze Age mobility across Anatolia, the Levant, and Mesopotamia
  • Iron Age and classical-era regional continuity in the eastern Mediterranean
  • Diaspora and trade-related dispersal into parts of southeastern Europe and surrounding areas

Because this is a rare lineage, any association with specific cultures should be treated as indirect and probabilistic rather than definitive.

Conclusion

J2A1A1A2B2A1B is a rare, downstream paternal lineage that fits within the broader Near Eastern distribution of J2a. Its scarcity suggests localized survival and inheritance through small ancestral communities, making it useful for tracing fine-scale paternal connections in the Near East and surrounding regions rather than large-scale population replacements.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis J2A1A1A2B2A1B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 J2A1A1A2B2A1B Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 J2A1A1A2B2A1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 92 0
3 J2A1A1A2B2A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 3 96 1
4 J2A1A1A2B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 1 180 0
5 J2A1A1A2B ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,800 Jahre 2 183 1
6 J2A1A1A2 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 Jahre 2 183 0
7 J2A1A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,500 Jahre 1 183 2
8 J2A1A1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 2 196 0
9 J2A1A ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 2 234 0
10 J2A1 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 559 0
11 J2A ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 684 6
12 J2 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 1,074 7
13 J ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 3 1,968 16

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Near East

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A1B is found include:

  1. Levantine populations
  2. Anatolian populations
  3. Caucasus populations
  4. Mesopotamian populations
  5. Iranian plateau populations
  6. Arabian Peninsula populations
  7. Jewish populations
  8. Southeastern European populations

Regionale Präsenz

Near East / Anatolia High
Southern Europe (Mediterranean coast) Low
North Africa (Mediterranean coast) Low
South Asia (northwest fringe) Low
Western Europe (diaspora/modern migrants) Low
Southeastern Europe Low
Central Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe J2A1A1A2B2A1B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig J2A1A1A2B2A1B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu J2A1A1A2B2A1B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Canaanite Early Bronze Anatolia Hagios Charalambos Culture Italy_Sicily_IA_b_Punic Kura-Araxes Late Anatolian Chalcolithic Nubian Christian Pantikapaion Tell Atchana
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.