Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B is a very rare subclade within the broader R1b paternal lineage, one of the major western Eurasian Y-chromosome branches. At this depth in the tree, the haplogroup is best understood as a late-derived regional lineage that likely emerged in West Eurasia during the Late Upper Paleolithic or early Mesolithic, broadly around 14 thousand years ago based on the parent-clade context.

Because this clade is downstream of a highly successful western Eurasian paternal macro-lineage, its present-day pattern is expected to be influenced more by local continuity, drift, bottlenecks, and founder effects than by a single well-defined migration pulse. The available population-genetic context for the parent lineage suggests that this branch may preserve ancestry from ancient western Eurasian groups that later persisted in scattered pockets across Europe and adjacent regions.

Subclades

R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B is itself an intermediate terminal-like branch within the parent clade R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2. In practical terms, this means it sits close to the bottom of the phylogenetic tree and may have few or no widely recognized daughter branches in current datasets.

As with many rare Y-DNA lineages, additional sampling and high-resolution sequencing may reveal finer structure in the future. Any newly identified sub-branches would likely be geographically restricted and useful for distinguishing local founder lines from broader regional ancestry.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to occur at low frequency across a scattered set of populations in western and southern Europe, the Caucasus, the Anatolian and Levantine zones, and selected parts of North Africa and Central Asia. Such a distribution is consistent with the broader behavior of rare R1b subclades: they can persist in isolated communities even when their overall frequency is very low.

The populations reported for the parent context—such as Irish and British, French, Iberian, and Low Countries, Italian and Balkan, Caucasus and Anatolian, Levantine and North African, and some Central Asian and steppe-related groups—fit a pattern of historical contact, long-term regional persistence, and genetic drift. However, for this specific subclade, presence should be interpreted as sporadic and highly localized rather than broadly characteristic of any one population.

Historical and Cultural Significance

No single archaeological culture can be assigned confidently and exclusively to R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B. Still, because it belongs to the broader R1b west Eurasian system, it may be indirectly related to population histories associated with postglacial western Eurasian expansions, Neolithic and Chalcolithic mobility, and later Bronze Age demographic transformations.

For context, broad R1b expansions are often discussed alongside cultures such as Yamnaya, Corded Ware, and Bell Beaker, but those associations apply to major R1b branches rather than specifically to this rare downstream clade. For R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B, the most defensible interpretation is that it represents a small surviving offshoot of a much older western Eurasian paternal pool, potentially maintained in genetically isolated communities over many millennia.

Interpretation in Population Genetics

Rare haplogroups like this one are especially vulnerable to sampling bias. A lineage may appear concentrated in one region simply because that is where enough testing has occurred, or because one local family line expanded disproportionately. For that reason, the current best explanation is not a single ethnic label but a combination of ancient origin, local persistence, and stochastic demographic history.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B is a deep, rare branch of western Eurasian R1b that likely originated in West Eurasia around the Late Upper Paleolithic. Its patchy presence across multiple regions suggests an old lineage preserved through drift and founder effects, making it most informative as a marker of deep regional ancestry rather than a signature of one historical culture or migration.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Interpretation in Population Genetics
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B Aktuell ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 1 0
2 R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 2 0
3 R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 6 1
4 R1B1A1B1A1A2B1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 220 0
5 R1B1A1B1A1A2B ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 3 484 12
6 R1B1A1B1A1A2 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 6 1,260 0
7 R1B1A1B1A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 4 1,715 70
8 R1B1A1B1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 1,789 0
9 R1B1A1B1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 1,796 15
10 R1B1A1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,085 0
11 R1B1A1B ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,317 31
12 R1B1A1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,321 0
13 R1B1A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,020 39
14 R1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,166 0
15 R1b ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 4,262 126
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

West Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B is found include:

  1. Irish and British populations
  2. French, Iberian, and Low Countries populations
  3. Italian and Balkan populations
  4. Caucasus and Anatolian populations
  5. Levantine and North African populations
  6. Some Central Asian and steppe-related populations

Regionale Präsenz

Western Europe Moderate
Northern Europe (British Isles & Ireland) Moderate
Southern Europe (Northern Iberia) Low
North America (Atlantic Canada, USA) Low
Oceania (Australia, New Zealand) Low
Eastern Europe Low
Western Asia Low
North Africa Low
Central Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  2. ~14k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1B1A1B1A1A2B1C2B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Bell Beaker British Iron Age Denmark_Broskov_LateRoman Denmark_Lillevasby_LN France_Parancot_BA Hallstatt Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Knoviz Culture Roman Provincial Scythian Culture Svilos Culture Vekerzug Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.