Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a4b2c1B is a deeply nested subclade within the wider R1b paternal phylogeny, which is one of the dominant Y-chromosome lineages in western Eurasia. Because it sits far downstream of the major R1b radiation, this branch almost certainly formed after the initial spread of R1b-associated lineages in the late Pleistocene or early Holocene, with an estimated origin around 14 kya in West Eurasia.

As a rare derived branch, its present-day pattern is best explained by long-term persistence at low frequency, local drift, and repeated episodes of regional dispersal. This means it is not primarily identified with one single large prehistoric population movement, but rather with a lineage that survived through multiple demographic transitions, including the Mesolithic-to-Neolithic shift, Bronze Age expansions, and later historical migrations.

Subclades

As an intermediate clade, R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a4b2c1B serves as a connecting branch in the tree between its parent and any more terminal descendant lineages. In practical population-genetic terms, such intermediate branches are often important because they can help refine the placement of rare samples and illuminate fine-scale ancestry relationships within broader R1b diversity.

No widely established, population-level subclade structure is currently associated with this branch in the same way as major R1b clades such as R1b-L23, R1b-P312, or R1b-U106. However, if additional samples are discovered, this branch may eventually be resolved into regionally informative downstream lineages.

Geographical Distribution

The distribution of this haplogroup is expected to be patchy and low frequency across a broad West Eurasian zone. Reported or inferred occurrences are most compatible with populations in Ireland and Britain, France, Iberia, and the Low Countries, Italy and the Balkans, the Caucasus and Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa, and some Central Asian or steppe-related groups.

This pattern is consistent with an old lineage that was carried through multiple cultural and demographic layers of Eurasian history. In western Europe, it may reflect survival within populations shaped by the spread of Bronze Age R1b lineages and later regional continuity. In the eastern Mediterranean, Caucasus, and North Africa, its occurrence may reflect historical mobility, trade, imperial contact, or older Near Eastern connections involving R1b-bearing males.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because this is a rare downstream R1b lineage, it does not map cleanly onto a single famous archaeological culture. Still, its broad West Eurasian context makes it compatible with the deep ancestry framework often discussed for Late Neolithic and Bronze Age paternal expansions.

Possible cultural associations are therefore indirect and inferential rather than definitive. Broader R1b movements are often discussed in relation to Pontic-Caspian steppe populations, Corded Ware, Bell Beaker, and later Bronze Age demographic shifts in Europe. However, a rare subclade such as this one could also have survived in localized communities without participating in the major expansions of its more successful sister lineages.

Historically, lineages like this are valuable because they preserve evidence of minority paternal continuity across centuries or millennia. Their distribution can sometimes highlight regional genetic continuity in places where major lineages dominate the broader picture.

Conclusion

R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a4b2c1B is best understood as an ancient, low-frequency subbranch of the western Eurasian R1b tree. Its significance lies less in large-scale expansion and more in its ability to reveal the fine structure of paternal ancestry across Europe, the Near East, North Africa, and parts of Central Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1 Aktuell ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 32 0
4 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 40 0
5 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 3 83 0
6 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 125 0
7 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 3 126 0
8 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 6 435 9
9 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 761 0
10 R1B1A1B1A1A2C ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 763 111
11 R1B1A1B1A1A2 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 6 1,260 0
12 R1B1A1B1A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 4 1,715 70
13 R1B1A1B1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 1,789 0
14 R1B1A1B1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 1,796 15
15 R1B1A1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,085 0
16 R1B1A1B ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,317 31
17 R1B1A1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,321 0
18 R1B1A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,020 39
19 R1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,166 0
20 R1b ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 4,262 126

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

West Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a4b2c1B is found include:

  1. Irish and British populations
  2. French, Iberian, and Low Countries populations
  3. Italian and Balkan populations
  4. Caucasus and Anatolian populations
  5. Levantine and North African populations
  6. Some Central Asian and steppe-related populations

Regionale Präsenz

Western Europe Low
Northern Europe Low
Eastern Europe Low
Southern Europe Low
Western Asia Low
North Africa Low
Central Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  2. ~14k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A4B2C1B1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

1984 Anglo-Saxon British Iron Age British Late Bronze Age Danish Late Neolithic Early Árpád Norse Pagan Northumbrian Bronze Age present Scottish Bronze Age Scottish Iron Age Viking
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.