Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R2A2B1B2A1A

Y-DNA Haplogroup R2A2B1B2A1A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R2A2B1B2A1A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R2A2B1B2A1A is a highly derived subclade within the broader R2 paternal lineage, which itself is most strongly associated with South Asia and parts of Central Asia. Because this branch sits several steps downstream from R2 and is described as rare, its age is best understood as a deep but localized lineage that likely arose in the late Holocene, roughly around 10 thousand years ago or somewhat earlier within the same general regional horizon.

The evolutionary history of this haplogroup is probably shaped more by genetic drift, founder effects, and local population structure than by any major demographic expansion. In population genetics terms, such lineages often persist at very low frequency across multiple regions because of historic mobility, small effective population sizes, and repeated interactions among pastoral, agricultural, and trading networks across Eurasia.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal branch under R2A2B1B2A1, haplogroup R2A2B1B2A1A represents a fine-scale lineage useful for tracing recent paternal descent within a much older clade. At this level of the tree, the subclade structure is often poorly sampled in public datasets, so apparent rarity may reflect both true scarcity and limited phylogenetic resolution.

In practical genealogical and archaeological genetics contexts, downstream R2 branches are often interpreted as indicators of localized continuity rather than large-scale migration waves. Further sequencing could identify sister branches or additional private SNPs that refine its internal branching and geographic history.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be found at very low frequency across a broad but discontinuous zone extending from South Asia into Central Asia, with occasional detections in West Asia/Near East, Eastern Europe, and the ancient Eurasian steppe. The distribution pattern is consistent with a lineage that has moved through connected prehistoric and historic networks but never achieved high frequency in any one region.

Most observations of rare R2-derived lineages are expected among populations with documented South Asian ancestry, particularly in regions historically connected by migration, trade, or imperial expansion. Low-frequency occurrences in western Eurasia are more likely to reflect gene flow, diaspora, or ancient steppe-linked mobility than local origin.

Historical and Cultural Significance

While no single archaeological culture can be securely assigned to R2A2B1B2A1A specifically, the broader R2 lineage is often discussed in relation to post-Neolithic population structure across South and Central Asia. The presence of this branch in a region spanning farming, pastoral, and trading networks suggests that it may have been carried by communities participating in the long-term demographic shaping of the Iranian plateau, the Indus sphere, and Central Asian corridors.

This haplogroup’s rarity makes it more informative as a lineage marker than as a population-wide signature. It may help identify paternal continuity in small or endogamous groups and can be useful in reconstructing the movement of specific male lines across Bronze Age and later historical periods, even if the clade itself predates those events.

Conclusion

R2A2B1B2A1A is a rare, deeply nested paternal lineage within R2 that likely originated in South or Central Asia around the early Holocene. Its present-day pattern is best explained by localized survival, drift, and occasional long-distance dispersal, making it a valuable but uncommon marker for studying fine-scale paternal ancestry across Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R2A2B1B2A1A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R2A2B1B2A1A Aktuell ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 R2A2B1B2A1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R2A2B1B2A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 R2A2B1B2 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 0 0
5 R2A2B1B ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 1 0 0
6 R2A2B1 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 1 0 0
7 R2A2B ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 1 0 1
8 R2A2 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 95 0
9 R2A ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 193 0
10 R2 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 229 4
11 R ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 2 510 15
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

South Asia or Central Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R2A2B1B2A1A is found include:

  1. South Asian populations
  2. Central Asian populations
  3. West Asian / Near Eastern populations
  4. Eastern European populations
  5. Ancient Eurasian steppe populations
  6. Some Western European populations at very low frequency

Regionale Präsenz

South Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
Middle East Low
Southeast Asia Low
Western Europe Low
Eastern Europe Low
North America Low
South Asia High
West Asia / Near East Low
Eurasian Steppe Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R2A2B1B2A1A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R2A2B1B2A1A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R2A2B1B2A1A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Aligrama Culture Bustan Culture Butkara Culture Katelai Culture Norse present Roopkund Culture Saidu Sharif Culture Tepe Anau
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.