Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

A2D*

mtDNA Haplogroup A2D*

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig A2D*

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup A2D* is a derived branch within the broader Native American maternal lineage A2, one of several founder haplogroups that descended from Asian/Beringian maternal lineages during the terminal Pleistocene and early Holocene. Based on the phylogenetic position of A2D as a subclade of A2 and coalescence estimates for A2-associated sublineages, A2D most likely emerged around the Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene (~12 kya) either within a Beringian/near-Beringian population or shortly after initial entry into the Americas during early post-glacial dispersals.

The pattern of A2D diversity — low overall frequency with geographically restricted peaks — is consistent with a founder effect followed by regional differentiation and local continuity. Its detection in at least one ancient DNA specimen supports antiquity within the Americas rather than representing a recent reintroduction.

Subclades

As represented here by the placeholder designation A2D*, the asterisk indicates lineages assigned to A2D that have not been further resolved into named downstream subclades in published or public databases. Where deeper sequencing or full mitogenomes are available, A2D may be split into finer branches; however, current datasets show A2D as a relatively shallow, low-diversity clade compared with some widespread A2 sublineages.

Geographical Distribution

A2D is primarily found in Indigenous populations of the Americas, with regional concentration in Andean and adjacent South American groups. Documented occurrences include:

  • Concentrations in certain Andean highland and nearby populations of South America (highest relative frequency within the Americas).
  • Low to moderate frequencies in some Central American Indigenous groups.
  • Low-frequency, regionally restricted occurrences in parts of North America.
  • Presence in modern admixed populations in the Americas reflecting Indigenous maternal ancestry.
  • Rare or possible detections in northeastern Siberian/Beringian-associated samples in limited datasets, which may reflect ancestral Beringian diversity or sampling noise.

This distribution suggests early introduction with subsequent local persistence and drift shaping the current pattern.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because A2D is a low-frequency, regionally restricted maternal lineage, its significance is primarily for reconstructing fine-scale population history rather than broad continental-scale events. The concentration in Andean populations points to long-term maternal continuity in parts of South America and can help trace maternal ancestry in archaeological and modern remains within the Andes and neighboring regions. The detection of A2D in at least one ancient DNA individual demonstrates that this lineage was present in pre-contact populations and can inform studies of demographic stability, migration, and population structure in the Holocene Americas.

A2D complements other Native American mtDNA lineages (e.g., A2 basal subclades, B2, C1, D1, D4h3a) in reconstructing the multi-lineage founder event(s) and subsequent regional differentiation across the hemisphere.

Conclusion

mtDNA haplogroup A2D* is a derived, low-frequency branch of the A2 maternal lineage that likely arose around the early Holocene in a Beringian-to-Americas context and has persisted with regional concentration in the Andean region of South America while remaining rare or patchily distributed elsewhere in the Americas. Its restricted distribution and low diversity make it informative for regional maternal lineage studies and for understanding local continuity since the early Holocene.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis A2D*. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 A2D* Aktuell ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 0 1 0
2 A2D ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 2 13 3
3 A2A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 26 332 58
4 A2 ~16,000 years ago Mesolithic 16,000 Jahre 8 895 14
5 AA1 - - - 14 942 0
6 AA - - - 4 947 0
7 A ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 4 997 192
8 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
9 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
10 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
11 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
12 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
13 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
14 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
15 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Beringia / Northeast Asia to the Americas

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup A2D is found include:

  1. Indigenous South American groups (regional concentrations in Andean and adjacent populations)
  2. Indigenous Central American groups at low frequencies
  3. Indigenous North American groups in selected locales (low frequency, regionally restricted)
  4. Modern admixed populations in the Americas (through Indigenous maternal ancestry)
  5. (Rare/possible) Low-frequency detections in northeastern Siberia/Beringian-associated groups in some datasets
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~12k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe A2D*

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig A2D*

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu A2D*. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Argentina_BuenosAires_7700BP Arroyo Seco Laguna Chica Lapa do Santo Lauricocha Culture Maya Classic Purépecha Santa Rosa Island Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.