Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

A3A

mtDNA Haplogroup A3A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig A3A

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup A3A is a downstream subclade of haplogroup A3, itself a branch of macro-haplogroup A. Haplogroup A is an ancient East Asian lineage that also gave rise to Native American maternal lineages (e.g., A2). Based on the phylogenetic position of A3A within A3 and available diversity in related lineages, A3A most plausibly arose in Northeast Asia or adjacent Siberia during the early–mid Holocene (roughly 6–10 kya) as local populations expanded after the Last Glacial Maximum and into the Neolithic.

Because A3A is relatively rare in modern samples and has limited reported internal diversity, its coalescent age is likely younger than the parent A3 node and consistent with a regional Holocene emergence rather than a deeply Pleistocene origin.

Subclades

A3A itself is a fine-scale designation within A3. Published and database classifications sometimes record A3a/A3A as small sister lineages or as terminal branches with limited internal structure, reflecting its low frequency and limited sampling. No widely recognized, deeply branching internal substructure for A3A has been established in large public phylogenies; additional sequencing of full mitogenomes from Siberia and the Amur/Primorye area could reveal further subclades.

Geographical Distribution

A3A is concentrated in Northeast Asia and parts of Siberia. Modern occurrences are reported at low frequencies among Tungusic-speaking peoples, some Mongolic groups, and occasionally in populations of the Korean peninsula and northern Japan (including contexts related to Jomon-descended groups), though sampling is sparse. The haplogroup has also been detected in isolated ancient individuals from the broader Northeast Asian / Amur region, indicating presence in archaeological contexts.

A3A commonly co-occurs in the same populations that carry other Northeast Asian mtDNA lineages such as D4, G, M7, and N9; these combined patterns reflect regional maternal gene pools shaped by post-glacial expansions and later population interactions across Siberia, Mongolia and the East Asian littoral.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because A3A is rare, it is not tied to any single high-profile migration event on its own, but its presence in modern Tungusic and Mongolic groups and detection in at least one ancient sample supports a picture of regional continuity and local demographic processes in Northeast Asia during the Holocene. Reasonable archaeological associations include:

  • Amur Neolithic / Early Holocene hunter-gatherer groups — likely contexts for local diversification of several Northeast Asian maternal lineages including branches of A3.
  • Jomon-related groups (northern Japan) — occasional low-frequency overlaps are consistent with maritime/coastal interactions that connected parts of the East Asian seaboard.
  • Later historic-era steppe and forest-steppe interactions (for example, during Iron Age and medieval expansions) may have transported rare maternal lineages like A3A between neighboring populations, producing sporadic occurrences.

Because the haplogroup is rare, it is most useful for fine-scale regional studies of maternal continuity, micro-demographic events and local ancestry rather than for tracing continent-scale migrations.

Conclusion

mtDNA A3A is a low-frequency, regionally focused maternal lineage nested within A3 and ultimately within macro-haplogroup A. Its inferred Holocene origin in Northeast Asia / Siberia and its occurrence both in some modern Tungusic/Mongolic-associated populations and at least one archaeological sample point to local diversification and persistence through the Holocene in the Amur–Siberian transition zone. Broader sampling of complete mitogenomes from understudied Northeast Asian and Siberian populations, and additional ancient DNA data, would clarify A3A's internal structure, precise age and finer geographic history.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis A3A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 A3A Aktuell ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 0 1 0
2 A3 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 1 2 0
3 AA - - - 4 947 0
4 A ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 4 997 192
5 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
6 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
7 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
8 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
9 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
10 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
11 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
12 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Northeast Asia (Siberia / Amur region)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup A3A is found include:

  1. Evenk and other Tungusic-speaking groups (Siberia)
  2. Yakut / Sakha (northern Siberia) — occasional reports
  3. Buryat and Mongolic populations (Mongolia / Baikal region)
  4. Korean peninsula populations (low frequency)
  5. Northern Japanese / Jomon-descended groups (sporadic occurrences)
  6. Indigenous Amur-region hunter-gatherer contexts (ancient DNA)
  7. Small numbers in mixed Northeast Asian urban populations
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~8k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe A3A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig A3A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu A3A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Angara River Culture Kitoi Kuenga Culture Lokomotiv Culture Ob River Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_Eneolithic Russia_Irkutsk_Eneolithic_BA Ulgii Culture Ust-Ida Culture Wuzhuangguoliang Culture Yenisei Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.