Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

A5A

mtDNA Haplogroup A5A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig A5A

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup A5A is a subclade within the broader A5 branch of macro-haplogroup A. The parent clade A5 is inferred to have formed in the Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene (around ~15 kya) in northeastern/East Asia; A5A represents a later split within that lineage, most plausibly dating to the Early Holocene (on the order of ~7–11 kya). As a downstream branch of A5, A5A reflects postglacial diversification of maternal lineages in northern East Asia and adjacent island systems.

Phylogenetically, A5A sits under the A5 node and shares the deep East Asian ancestry characteristic of haplogroup A, which itself rose to prominence among populations north of the Yangtze and across the Amur–Okhotsk and Japanese archipelago regions after the Last Glacial Maximum. The timing of A5A's origin suggests expansion during the warmer and more stable climates of the Early Holocene that facilitated local population continuity and range shifts.

Subclades (if applicable)

A5A is treated as a distinct sub-branch of A5 in modern phylogenies; depending on different sequencing studies and nomenclature updates, A5A may be further divided into finer sublineages when full mitogenomes reveal additional derived mutations. At present, A5A itself is recognized as a regional marker rather than a deep, widely subdivided clade—future dense mitogenome sampling in northeast Asia and the Japanese archipelago may reveal internal substructure.

Geographical Distribution

Modern distribution: A5A shows highest frequencies and representation among populations of the Japanese archipelago (including individuals with Ainu and some Ryukyuan ancestry) and is present at moderate levels in Koreans, northern Han Chinese and other northeastern Chinese groups, Mongolian populations, and several indigenous Siberian groups (for example Evenks and Yakuts) at lower frequencies. It also appears sporadically at low frequency among some Central Asian and Turkic groups, consistent with long-distance gene flow and historic contacts.

Ancient DNA: A5A has been observed in a small number of Holocene archaeological samples (5 instances in the database referenced by the user), including contexts tied to prehistoric coastal and inland hunter-gatherer groups of northeast Asia and the Japanese archipelago. These ancient occurrences support A5A's role in regional maternal continuity from the Early Holocene into later prehistoric periods.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because A5A is concentrated in northeast Asia and the Japanese islands, it is particularly informative for questions about the genetic makeup of Jomon-era populations and their contribution to modern insular Japanese groups (Ainu, Ryukyuan and parts of the Japanese mainland). The clade's persistence into later periods also makes it useful for studying admixture events such as those involving Neolithic and Bronze Age migrants (e.g., Yayoi-associated continental gene flow) and for tracking localized maternal line continuity through the Holocene.

A5A's presence among Siberian and Mongolian groups at low frequencies signals historical mobility and demographic contacts across northeastern Eurasia, including trade, pastoralist expansions, and other interactions that moved maternal lineages beyond their core range.

Conclusion

A5A is a regional mtDNA lineage that exemplifies postglacial maternal diversification in northeastern Asia and the Japanese archipelago. Its detection in both modern and ancient samples makes it a valuable marker for reconstructing maternal continuity, localized population structure, and east Asian Holocene demographic processes. Continued mitogenome sequencing across understudied northeast Asian populations and additional ancient samples will refine the age estimate, internal structure, and migratory history of A5A.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis A5A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 A5A Aktuell ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 0 7 0
2 A5 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 3 16 0
3 A ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 4 997 192
4 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
5 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
6 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
7 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
8 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
9 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
10 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
11 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (2)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Northeast/East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup A5A is found include:

  1. Indigenous and modern populations of the Japanese archipelago (including Ainu and some Ryukyuan groups)
  2. Korean populations
  3. Northern Han Chinese and other northeast Chinese groups
  4. Mongolian populations
  5. Indigenous Siberian groups (e.g., Evenks, Yakuts)
  6. Selected Central Asian and Turkic groups at low frequencies
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~9k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe A5A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig A5A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu A5A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Angara River Culture Kitoi Kuenga Culture Lokomotiv Culture Ob River Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_Eneolithic Russia_Irkutsk_Eneolithic_BA Ulgii Culture Ust-Ida Culture Wuzhuangguoliang Culture Yenisei Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.