Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

F4A1

mtDNA Haplogroup F4A1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig F4A1

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup F4A1 is a subclade of F4A, itself nested within the broader haplogroup F lineage that is characteristic of East and Southeast Asian maternal diversity. Based on the phylogenetic position of F4A1 beneath F4A and population-level age estimates for related F4 clades, F4A1 most likely arose in the early to mid-Holocene (roughly ~6 kya), a period of increasing sedentism, population growth, and the spread of farming in parts of East and Southeast Asia. F4A1 is defined by one or more downstream mutations from F4A and represents one of several regional daughter lineages that partition maternal variation across coastal and inland population networks.

Subclades

F4A1 contains further downstream branches observed at low to moderate frequency in some regional studies; however, the resolution and naming of deeper subclades varies by dataset and sequencing depth. Where denser full-mitogenome surveys exist, researchers recover localized F4A1 sub-branches that reflect founder effects and regional differentiation (for example localized island-specific sub-branches in parts of Island Southeast Asia and Near Oceania). Continued mitogenome sequencing is revealing finer structure within F4A1, but many published population surveys report F4A1 as a single recognizable cluster derived from F4A.

Geographical Distribution

F4A1 shows a geographically broad but generally low-to-moderate frequency distribution concentrated in East and Southeast Asia, with overflow into Island Southeast Asia and isolated occurrences in Near Oceania and parts of Central and Northeast Asia. It is observed among Han Chinese, Japanese and Korean populations, a range of Mainland Southeast Asian groups (Thai, Vietnamese, Lao, Khmer), Tai-Kadai speaking peoples (e.g., Zhuang), and many Austronesian-speaking populations (Formosan groups, Filipinos, Indonesians). In Island and Near Oceanian contexts F4A1 appears at low to moderate frequencies in some island populations, consistent with limited maternal founder events during Austronesian voyaging and later contacts.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although not diagnostic of any single archaeological culture, F4A1 likely participated in demographic processes tied to the Neolithic expansion of farming and coastal foraging communities in East and Southeast Asia and later to the Austronesian dispersal that began in the mid-Holocene. In Island Southeast Asia and Near Oceania, the presence of F4A1 in some island populations is consistent with female-mediated gene flow accompanying seafaring and settlement (for example, Lapita and subsequent regional interactions), while persistent frequencies in mainland East Asian populations reflect deeper Holocene continuity and local demographic dynamics.

F4A1 is therefore useful in population genetics studies as a marker of regional maternal ancestry and microevolutionary processes (founder effects, drift, and admixture) across coastal East and Southeast Asia.

Conclusion

mtDNA haplogroup F4A1 is an intermediate Holocene maternal lineage derived from F4A, with a distribution centered on East and Southeast Asia and detectable signatures in Island Southeast Asia and parts of Near Oceania. It illustrates how daughter branches of regional haplogroups record both early Holocene population structure and later dispersals, and it benefits from higher-resolution mitogenome sequencing to clarify its internal branching and localized demographic history.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis F4A1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 F4A1 Aktuell ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 F4A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 2 5 2
3 F4 ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 2 20 0
4 F ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 Jahre 4 265 6
5 R9 ~40,000 years ago Paleolithic 40,000 Jahre 3 281 0
6 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 Jahre 17 22,830 57
7 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
8 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
9 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
10 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
11 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
12 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
13 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
14 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
15 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East / Southeast Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup F4A1 is found include:

  1. Han Chinese
  2. Japanese (including populations with Jomon/Yayoi ancestry signals)
  3. Koreans
  4. Vietnamese
  5. Thai and other Tai-Kadai speaking groups (e.g., Zhuang)
  6. Austronesian-speaking populations (Taiwanese Indigenous/Formosan, Filipinos, Indonesians, Malays)
  7. Tibeto-Burman groups (low to moderate frequencies)
  8. Indigenous groups of Mainland Southeast Asia (e.g., Lao, Khmer)
  9. Indigenous and admixed populations in Near Oceania (low to moderate frequencies in some islands)
  10. Certain Central Asian and southern Siberian groups (generally low frequencies)
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~6k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe F4A1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig F4A1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu F4A1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Chinese Bronze-Iron Early Kazakh Iron Late Medieval Mongolian Roman Republic Russia_Irkutsk_N_Pribaikal Taiwanese Iron Yellow River Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.