Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

M2C

mtDNA Haplogroup M2C

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig M2C

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup M2C is a subclade of the broader South Asian lineage M2, which itself derives from macro-haplogroup M. Based on the position of M2C within the M2 phylogeny and coalescence estimates for neighboring M2 subclades, M2C most likely arose in the Late Pleistocene (on the order of a few tens of thousands of years ago) within the Indian subcontinent. Its emergence likely postdates the initial arrival of M-bearing maternal lineages into South Asia (often dated to ~50 kya) and may reflect population fragmentation and regional differentiation during climatic fluctuations such as the Last Glacial Maximum.

The lineage shows signs of long-term persistence in South Asia, consistent with refugial continuity of maternal lineages among hunter-gatherer and early Holocene groups. Limited ancient DNA detections (two samples in the provided database) are consistent with M2C being present in archaeological contexts, although it is less commonly recovered in aDNA compared with some more frequent South Asian haplogroups.

Subclades

M2C is a defined branch within M2 and appears to have limited deep substructure in published datasets relative to some other M2 subclades (e.g., M2a, M2b). Where internal diversity is observed, it is consistent with local differentiation across South Asian tribal and caste populations. Because M2C is less frequent than the dominant M2 subclades, published phylogenies often show fewer recognized downstream lineages for M2C, but continued sampling and mitogenome sequencing in under-studied populations may reveal additional sublineages.

Geographical Distribution

Geographically, M2C is concentrated in South Asia, with particularly higher representation among indigenous (Adivasi/tribal) communities and some Dravidian-speaking groups in southern India. It is also detected at lower frequencies among Indo-Aryan speaking populations in North and Central India and in neighboring regions (Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal). Occasional low-frequency detections occur among the South Asian diaspora in the Middle East and Europe. The distribution pattern suggests deep regional roots with some later diffusion through normal demographic contact and migration within South Asia.

Historical and Cultural Significance

M2C likely reflects maternal lineages that were part of the early peopling and long-term population continuity of South Asia. Its prevalence among tribal and indigenous groups points to a strong association with pre-agricultural and early Holocene communities (hunter-gatherer and early forager-farmer transitional groups). Unlike haplogroups associated with large-scale Holocene farming or steppe expansions, M2C does not show evidence for major continental demographic expansions in the late Holocene; rather, it documents regional continuity and microevolutionary processes within South Asia. The limited number of ancient DNA hits indicates that while it was present in the past, more aDNA work in South Asia is required to fully resolve its archaeological associations.

Conclusion

mtDNA haplogroup M2C is a regionally important South Asian maternal lineage with origins in the Late Pleistocene and a present-day distribution centered on indigenous and many South Asian populations. It contributes to the deep maternal genetic structure of the subcontinent and serves as one marker of long-term continuity of maternal ancestry in South Asia. Ongoing mitogenome sequencing and ancient DNA research will refine its internal topology, age estimates, and archaeological correlates.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis M2C. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 M2C Aktuell ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 0 3 0
2 M2 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 Jahre 2 22 3
3 M ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 42 2,671 41
4 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
5 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
6 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
7 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
8 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
9 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
10 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

South Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup M2C is found include:

  1. Adivasi and tribal groups across India (e.g., Gond, Bhil and other indigenous communities)
  2. Dravidian-speaking populations in South India (Tamil, Telugu regions)
  3. Indo-Aryan speaking populations in North and Central India
  4. Sri Lankan indigenous Veddah and broader Sri Lankan populations
  5. Populations of Pakistan (regional groups with South Asian ancestry)
  6. Bangladesh and Bengali populations at low to moderate frequencies
  7. Nepalese lowland and foothill populations
  8. Himalayan foothill groups with South Asian maternal ancestry
  9. South Asian diaspora communities (e.g., in the Middle East, Europe)
  10. Occasional detections in neighboring South-Central Asian groups
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~25k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe M2C

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig M2C

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu M2C. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Andamanese British Neolithic Goyet Cave Gravettian Katelai Culture Ostuni Culture Spanish Gravettian Udegram Culture Vietnamese Neolithic
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.