Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

M3D

mtDNA Haplogroup M3D

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig M3D

Origins and Evolution

M3D is a defined subclade of mtDNA haplogroup M3, itself a South Asian branch of macro-haplogroup M. While the parent clade M3 has an estimated coalescence in the Late Pleistocene (~25 kya), M3D likely differentiated later within South Asia during the Early Holocene (plausible coalescent estimate ~8 kya). This timing is consistent with local diversification following post-glacial demographic changes and the onset of more sedentary subsistence practices in parts of the subcontinent. The phylogenetic position of M3D as a derived branch of M3 implies it carries the defining M3 mutations plus additional private mutations that mark the D sublineage.

Genetic drift in relatively small, structured maternal populations and limited female-mediated gene flow (exacerbated by prevalent patrilocal residence practices in many South Asian societies) can explain the localized high frequency of some M3 subclades and the persistence of M3D in particular groups.

Subclades

As currently recognized, M3D is a downstream lineage within M3 with limited further named subclades in the published literature and public databases. Targeted full mitogenome sequencing of carriers has the potential to reveal additional internal structure (e.g., M3D1, M3D2) as sample sizes increase. At present, M3D is treated as a distinct terminal or near-terminal branch defined by a small set of private mutations relative to the M3 backbone.

Geographical Distribution

M3D shows a concentrated distribution across the Indian subcontinent with sporadic low-frequency occurrences in adjoining regions due to historical and recent gene flow. High relative frequencies are reported among certain tribal groups and some caste populations in India, with documented occurrences among Sinhalese and Tamil individuals in Sri Lanka, and lower-frequency detection in parts of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Himalayan foothills. Rare occurrences have been reported further afield (Southeast Asia, Central Asia) and in modern diaspora populations in Europe and the Americas. In archaeogenetic datasets M3D has been observed in a small number of ancient South Asian individuals (the referenced database records six archaeological samples carrying M3D), supporting its local antiquity.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because M3D is predominantly South Asian and relatively localized, it is most informative for studies of regional maternal ancestry, microevolution, and population structure within the subcontinent. The lineage likely persisted through major cultural transitions in South Asia — from Mesolithic foragers to early Neolithic/ farming communities and later Bronze and Iron Age societies — often tracking community continuity rather than broad continent-scale migrations. Associations with particular ethnolinguistic or tribal communities in genetic surveys make M3D useful for reconstructing maternal founder events, endogamy-driven differentiation, and female-specific demographic histories.

Conclusion

M3D is a regionally important maternal lineage derived from M3 that reflects local diversification in South Asia during the Holocene. While not a high-frequency lineage across the entire subcontinent, its presence in multiple modern populations and several ancient samples attests to its continuity and value for fine-scale maternal phylogeography. Expanded mitogenome sequencing and broader sampling will clarify its internal structure, precise age, and micro-regional affinities within South Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis M3D. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 M3D Aktuell ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 0 7 0
2 M3 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 4 95 3
3 M ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 42 2,671 41
4 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
5 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
6 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
7 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
8 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
9 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
10 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (3)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

South Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup M3D is found include:

  1. Various South Asian populations (tribal groups and caste populations across India)
  2. Sri Lankan populations (Tamil and Sinhalese groups)
  3. Pakistani populations (selected groups in Punjab, Sindh and adjoining regions)
  4. Bangladeshi populations (low to moderate frequencies in some groups)
  5. Nepalese and Himalayan highland populations (sporadic occurrences)
  6. Central Asian populations (low frequency, typically due to gene flow)
  7. Southeast Asian groups (rare occurrences in Myanmar/Thailand region)
  8. Regional island populations in the Indian Ocean rim (low frequency)
  9. Modern diaspora populations in Europe and the Americas (very low frequency)
  10. Ancient South Asian archaeological individuals (identified in 6 ancient DNA samples in the referenced database)
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~8k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe M3D

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig M3D

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu M3D. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Andamanese British Neolithic Caishichang Culture Goyet Cave Gravettian Hetian Culture Ostuni Culture Roopkund Culture Spanish Gravettian
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.