Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

C2A1A2A2A

Y-DNA Haplogroup C2A1A2A2A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig C2A1A2A2A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A2A2A is a terminal subclade of the broader C-M217 (C2) family and descends from C2A1A2A2. Given its phylogenetic position, C2A1A2A2A most likely arose in the Central–East Asian / southern Siberian borderlands during the late Holocene (on the order of ~1–1.5 kya), a period that saw intensified mobility, linguistic shifts, and ethnogenesis among steppe, forest-steppe, and taiga peoples. The clade represents a relatively recent diversification within a lineage that already had a strong presence among Mongolic- and Tungusic-speaking groups.

Ancient DNA sampling in northern and eastern Eurasia remains uneven, but recovered C2 sublineages in medieval and later contexts often reflect demographic processes linked to pastoralist expansions, clan-level founder effects, and the high male-lineage drift typical of steppe societies. In that context, C2A1A2A2A can be seen as a marker of one or more localized male founders within the broader C2A1A2A2 distribution.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal clade in some published trees, C2A1A2A2A may contain fine-scale downstream branches identifiable only with high-resolution SNP testing or full Y-chromosome sequencing. Where detected, subclades are expected to show strong geographic clustering (e.g., specific Mongol, Buryat, Evenk, or Yakut clans) consistent with recent clan/family expansions. Because high-resolution sampling is still incomplete across Siberia and Mongolia, additional substructure within C2A1A2A2A likely remains to be discovered.

Geographical Distribution

The contemporary distribution of C2A1A2A2A is concentrated in Central-East Asia and northern Asia, with the highest frequencies and diversity in areas around Mongolia and southern Siberia. Typical occurrences include:

  • Mongolic-speaking populations (e.g., Mongols, Buryats), where the clade can reach appreciable local frequency in certain clans.
  • Tungusic groups (e.g., Evenks, Evens, Oroqen) across Siberia and the Russian Far East.
  • Sakha (Yakut) and other North Siberian groups, reflecting later northward movements and founder effects.
  • Selected southern Siberian Turkic groups (e.g., some Tuvan and Altai clans) at lower frequencies, likely from regional gene flow and shared steppe histories.
  • Low-frequency occurrences in Northeast Asian populations (e.g., Koreans, Japanese) and very rare/isolated detections in some Indigenous North American samples, probably reflecting ancient and historic long-distance contacts or recent gene flow.

Historical and Cultural Significance

While direct linking of a single Y-haplogroup to large historic polities should be done cautiously, lineages within the C2A1A2A2 complex are often implicated in the male-mediated expansions and clan structures of late Iron Age through medieval steppe societies. C2A1A2A2A likely rose to local prominence via founder effects associated with social structures that amplify male lineages (e.g., patrilineal clans, elite male-driven expansions). The haplogroup's pattern is consistent with genetic footprints left by movements associated with Turkic and Mongolic steppe polities, as well as localized Tungusic expansions in northern Asia.

Conclusion

C2A1A2A2A is best interpreted as a late Holocene, regionally concentrated male lineage that illustrates how relatively recent founder events and medieval-era population movements shaped the Y-chromosome landscape of Central–East Asia and northern Siberia. Continued high-resolution sampling and ancient DNA recovery across Mongolia and Siberia will refine the clade's internal structure, its precise age, and its ties to documented archaeological cultures and historic migrations.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis C2A1A2A2A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 C2A1A2A2A Aktuell ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,200 Jahre 0 0 0
2 C2A1A2A2 ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 C2A1A2A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 C2A1A2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 C2A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 4 3 0
6 C2A1 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 3 0
7 C2A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 1 38 0
8 C2 ~40,000 years ago Paleolithic 40,000 Jahre 2 99 24
9 C ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 3 406 35

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Central–East Asia (Mongolia / Southern Siberia)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A2A2A is found include:

  1. Mongolic-speaking groups (e.g., Mongols, Buryats)
  2. Tungusic peoples of Siberia (e.g., Evenks, Evens, Oroqen)
  3. Sakha (Yakut) and other North Siberian populations
  4. Selected Turkic groups of southern Siberia (e.g., some Tuvan and Altai clans)
  5. Low-frequency occurrences in Northeast Asian populations (e.g., Koreans, Japanese)
  6. Very rare/isolated occurrences in some Indigenous North American samples

Regionale Präsenz

Northeast Asia High
Southern Siberia High
Central Asia Moderate
Eastern Europe (Volga/Caspian steppe - Kalmyk presence) Low
Northern Asia / Siberia Moderate
North America (isolated) Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~1.2k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe C2A1A2A2A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig C2A1A2A2A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu C2A1A2A2A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Boisman China_AmurRiverBasin_LatePaleolithic Irkutsk Culture Ob River Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_Eneolithic Russia_AltaiKrai_N Russia_AltaiKrai_N_Itkul Russia_EN_Kitoi Selenge Culture Xiongnu
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-15
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.