Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

G2A2A1A2A1A

Y-DNA Haplogroup G2A2A1A2A1A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig G2A2A1A2A1A

Origins and Evolution

Y‑DNA haplogroup G2A2A1A2A1A is a downstream branch of the broader G2a Neolithic clade. The parent lineage (G2A2A1A2A1) is associated with later Neolithic–Chalcolithic populations of Anatolia and the Near East; the further derived G2A2A1A2A1A most plausibly formed after that parent diversification as local populations in the Anatolia/Caucasus region continued to differentiate. Based on the parent clade's chronology and the depth implied by the naming hierarchy, a conservative estimate places the origin of this subclade in the last few thousand years (on the order of ~2–3 kya), reflecting regional micro‑diversification rather than the primary Neolithic expansion itself.

Because it is a relatively deep terminal subclade with limited sampling in modern and ancient datasets, its precise phylogenetic age and internal structure remain poorly resolved; additional targeted sequencing and ancient DNA recovery would refine the time-depth and branching pattern.

Subclades

At present G2A2A1A2A1A is treated as a narrow downstream lineage of G2A2A1A2A1. There are few well‑documented publicly available downstream branches attributed specifically to this marker set, and many reported instances are singletons in modern datasets. That pattern is consistent with a recent, localized split or with under‑sampling. If future high‑coverage Y‑SNP surveys reveal internal diversity, this haplogroup may be subdivided into several micro‑clades that reflect local demographic events in Anatolia, the Caucasus or adjoining Mediterranean populations.

Geographical Distribution

The geographic footprint of G2A2A1A2A1A is best described as localized and low frequency across the Near East, Caucasus and parts of southern Europe. Modern occurrences are currently sparse but cluster where parent G2a lineages are known to persist — notably in western Anatolia, parts of the South Caucasus and isolated pockets of the Mediterranean (islands and coastal Italy). Scattered instances in Balkan or Near Eastern Jewish populations and North Africa may reflect historical mobility, trade, or drift rather than primary origin locations.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because G2a lineages broadly are associated with early farming populations that spread from Anatolia into Europe during the Neolithic, downstream subclades such as G2A2A1A2A1A carry the genetic imprint of that deep farming ancestry. However, the likely later time of origin for this specific subclade implies it represents local differentiation within post‑Neolithic communities rather than the initial farmer migration. Its presence in modern Caucasus and Anatolian groups can reflect continuity of local paternal lines across the Bronze–Iron Age into historically attested populations of the region.

This haplogroup's rarity in ancient published samples limits confident association with a single archaeological culture, but it plausibly links to regional Chalcolithic–Bronze Age communities in Anatolia and the Caucasus and to subsequent historical populations in the eastern Mediterranean.

Conclusion

G2A2A1A2A1A is a low‑frequency, regionally concentrated subclade of G2a that likely formed within the Anatolia/Caucasus sphere after the main Neolithic expansions and represents local paternal differentiation. Current knowledge is constrained by limited sampling; expanded Y‑SNP screening and ancient DNA recovery from Anatolian and Caucasus contexts are required to better resolve its age, internal structure, and historical movements.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis G2A2A1A2A1A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 G2A2A1A2A1A Aktuell ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 1 6 0
2 G2A2A1A2A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 6 0
3 G2A2A1A2A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 9 0
4 G2A2A1A2 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 Jahre 2 37 0
5 G2A2A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 3 66 2
6 G2A2A1 ~7,000 years ago Neolithic 7,000 Jahre 1 66 0
7 G2A2A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 7,500 Jahre 2 93 12
8 G2A2 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,500 Jahre 2 684 0
9 G2A ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 2 910 14
10 G2 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 989 9
11 G ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 3 1,171 7

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Anatolia / Near East — Caucasus sphere

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup G2A2A1A2A1A is found include:

  1. Caucasus populations (e.g., Georgians, Armenians, Azerbaijanis)
  2. Anatolian and Near Eastern populations (western Turkey, eastern Anatolia, parts of the Levant)
  3. Southern / Mediterranean Europeans (isolated occurrences in Sardinia, parts of Italy and the western Mediterranean)
  4. Balkan coastal or Adriatic populations at low frequency (scattered cases)
  5. Scattered cases in Near Eastern Jewish communities and North Africa (low-frequency, likely due to historical mobility or drift)

Regionale Präsenz

West Asia (Anatolia & Caucasus) Moderate
Southern Europe (Mediterranean, Sardinia, Italy) Moderate
Western Europe Low
Central and South Asia Low
Caucasus Moderate
Balkans / Adriatic Low
North Africa Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe G2A2A1A2A1A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig G2A2A1A2A1A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu G2A2A1A2A1A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Baden-Yamnaya Culture Swiss Neolithic
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-16
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.