Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

N1A1A2

Y-DNA Haplogroup N1A1A2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig N1A1A2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup N1A1A2 is a downstream subclade of haplogroup N1A1A, itself part of the broader haplogroup N lineage that is widespread across northern Eurasia. Based on its phylogenetic position, N1A1A2 likely formed during the late Pleistocene to early Holocene transition, when postglacial population movements and expansions reshaped the paternal landscape of northern Eurasia. A reasonable estimate for its origin is around 12 kya, although the exact age depends on the current resolution of the phylogeny and future sampling.

This lineage belongs to the paternal genetic spectrum often associated with forest-zone and subarctic populations, where ancient connections linked northeastern Europe, the Ural region, and western Siberia. Its distribution reflects a long history of population differentiation followed by repeated expansions among groups living in taiga and boreal environments.

Subclades

As an intermediate or derived branch within N1A1A, haplogroup N1A1A2 likely contains one or more additional downstream lineages that have not yet been uniformly sampled in public datasets. In population genetics terms, this kind of subclade often represents a localized founder lineage that expanded within a regional population network.

Known or expected related lineages are found deeper within the same northern Eurasian N branches, especially among clades present in Finnic, Sámi, Samoyedic, and western Siberian populations. The exact internal branching structure may be revised as more Y-chromosome sequencing data becomes available.

Geographical Distribution

N1A1A2 is expected to be found at low to moderate frequencies across northern and northeastern Europe and western Siberia, with strongest associations in populations linked to the Uralic world. Its distribution is likely patchy, reflecting founder effects, drift, and local demographic history rather than broad pan-continental expansion.

This lineage may occur in:

  • Finnish and other Baltic-Finnic populations
  • Sámi populations of northern Fennoscandia
  • Estonian, Latvian, and Lithuanian populations
  • Uralic-speaking populations such as the Khanty, Mansi, Nenets, and Komi
  • Northern Siberian populations including Yakuts and other groups with northern Asian ancestry
  • Ancient DNA from northern and northeastern Europe

Historical and Cultural Significance

Haplogroup N lineages are frequently discussed in relation to the spread and diversification of populations around the Ural Mountains, the Baltic region, and the Siberian forest belt. N1A1A2, as a descendant branch, may be informative for tracing the paternal ancestry of communities shaped by the expansion of Uralic-speaking peoples and related circumpolar networks.

Although no single archaeological culture can be assigned exclusively to N1A1A2, comparable N-lineages are often discussed in connection with postglacial hunter-gatherer persistence, Neolithic and Bronze Age population interactions, and later Iron Age and medieval ethnolinguistic formations in northern Eurasia. In ancient DNA studies, related branches of haplogroup N have helped illuminate long-distance links between eastern Baltic, Fennoscandian, and Siberian populations.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup N1A1A2 is a northern Eurasian paternal lineage likely shaped by Holocene demographic expansions in the forest zone of Europe and Siberia. Its significance lies in its ability to connect modern and ancient populations across the circum-Baltic and western Siberian regions, especially within the broader context of Uralic-associated paternal history.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis N1A1A2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 N1A1A2 Aktuell ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 N1A1A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 50 1
3 N1A1 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 1 50 0
4 N1A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 59 0
5 N1 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 80 14
6 N ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 172 17
7 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

North Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup N1A1A2 is found include:

  1. Finnish and other Baltic-Finnic populations
  2. Estonian, Latvian, and Lithuanian populations
  3. Sámi populations of northern Fennoscandia
  4. Uralic-speaking populations such as the Khanty, Mansi, Nenets, and Komi
  5. Siberian populations including Yakuts and other northern Asian groups
  6. Ancient and modern populations of northern and northeastern Europe
  7. Some East Asian and Central Asian populations through deeper and downstream branches

Regionale Präsenz

Northern Europe (Fennoscandia) High
Baltic region Moderate
Northern European Russia Moderate
North Asia / Siberia Moderate
Northeast Asia (peripheral) Low
Northern Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~12k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe N1A1A2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig N1A1A2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu N1A1A2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Avar Avar Culture China_LN_Xiaoheyan Danish Medieval Early Avar Jierzankale Culture Khovd Bronze Age Ust-Ida Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.