Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B2H

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B2H

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B2H

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2H is a downstream subclade of R1a1a1b2, itself part of the wider R1a paternal lineage. Because it is nested within a branch strongly associated with post–early Bronze Age demographic expansions, this clade is most plausibly rooted in the Eurasian steppe / Eastern European frontier zone and likely emerged during the late Bronze Age to early Iron Age period.

As with many very specific Y-DNA subclades, the exact origin point of R1a1a1b2H is not firmly established in the literature unless it has been directly sampled in ancient DNA or broad modern datasets. However, its phylogenetic position implies descent from the steppe-linked R1a radiation that contributed heavily to the paternal ancestry of Slavic, Baltic, Indo-Iranian, and some Central Asian populations.

Subclades

R1a1a1b2H is an intermediate or relatively derived branch within the R1a tree. Its immediate downstream structure may be sparsely sampled or incompletely resolved in public datasets, which is common for rare Y-DNA lineages. In practical genetic genealogy, such clades often serve as markers for fine-scale paternal relatedness within broader R1a clusters.

Because this branch is specific and likely uncommon, it may represent one or a few localized founder events rather than a large prehistoric expansion on its own. Its internal diversity, if later documented, could help clarify whether it formed in an eastern European, steppe, or south-central Asian context.

Geographical Distribution

Modern occurrences of R1a1a1b2H are expected primarily in Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, Central Asia, and South Asia, mirroring the broader distribution of its parent lineage. The highest likelihood of finding this clade is in populations with substantial R1a ancestry derived from steppe-associated male lineages.

Typical populations where related R1a1a1b2 branches occur include Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Russians, Lithuanians, Latvians, Swedes, Norwegians, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Iranian-speaking groups, and many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations. In South Asia, R1a subclades are especially common among groups with historical Indo-Iranian linguistic and demographic connections, though exact downstream placement varies widely.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader R1a expansion is strongly linked to Bronze Age steppe mobility, including demographic processes associated with the Corded Ware horizon, later steppe pastoralist networks, and Indo-Iranian dispersals. While R1a1a1b2H itself cannot be assigned with confidence to a single archaeological culture without direct ancient DNA evidence, it most likely belongs to the same broad historical process that spread R1a-derived paternal lineages across much of Eurasia.

This lineage may therefore be relevant to the formation of paternal ancestry in Slavic, Baltic, Indo-Iranian, and Central Asian populations. In genetic genealogy, identifying a rare subclade like R1a1a1b2H can be useful for tracing regional founder effects, clan continuity, and deep paternal line differentiation.

Population Genetics Perspective

From a population genetics standpoint, R1a1a1b2H should be interpreted as a fine-resolution marker within a large macrolineage, not as evidence for any single ethnicity or language by itself. Its distribution is shaped by a combination of founder effects, drift, elite dominance, and population expansions over the last several thousand years.

Because downstream R1a branches often differ sharply in geographic concentration, the discovery of this clade in a family tree can be highly informative for genealogical inference, especially when combined with STR matching, SNP confirmation, and geographic context.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2H is a relatively specific paternal branch within the expansive R1a lineage, likely originating in the Eurasian steppe / Eastern European sphere during the later Bronze Age or early Iron Age. Its significance lies in its potential to illuminate fine-scale paternal descent within populations shaped by the major R1a dispersals across Europe and Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Population Genetics Perspective
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B2H. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B2H Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1A1A1B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 423 0
3 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
4 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
5 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
6 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
7 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eurasian Steppe / Eastern Europe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2H is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Northern Europe (Baltic & Scandinavia) Moderate
Central Asia Low
South Asia (northwest) Low
Caucasus / Near East Low
South Asia Moderate
West Asia Low
North Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B2H

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B2H

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B2H. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

ANATOLIAN_BRONZE_AGE Corded Ware Danish Middle Neolithic Fatyanovo Fatyanovo Culture Pazyryk Culture Sagly Culture Srubnaya-Alakul
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.