Casarabe, Cotoca, and Landívar settlement networks - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Amazonia and the Orinoco: Rivers, Landscapes, and Living Heritage
Llanos de Moxos · Source-reviewed profile

Casarabe, Cotoca, and Landívar settlement networks

Cotoca / Landívar (site or scholarly name, not an established ancient self-designation)

Monumental platforms, causeways and canals support study of low-density settlement networks in a seasonal landscape. Food and water-management interpretations require the evidence and scale of each study.

Low-density urban and water-management context Approximately 500-1400 CE for the Casarabe archaeological classification Lidar, excavation, dating, settlement analysis, landscape archaeology and environmental evidence. Trinidad public city orientation, Beni, Bolivia. Approximate public orientation only, never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, political, customary or sovereignty boundary. Not a burial, ancestral-remains, restricted rock-art or sacred-site location, private earthwork, Indigenous village or contact point for isolated peoples; no access or collecting permission is implied.
概览

Communities, landscapes, and the evidence

Rivers, forests, wetlands, and connections

Cotoca and Landívar are distinct centers in the savanna-forest mosaic. Trinidad is an orientation rather than a location for excavation or burial features.

Political organization and community scale

Differentiated centers and connecting infrastructure support political interpretations without revealing every institution or resident's allegiance.

Colonial transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

New survey and food-production research revise earlier models. Results from a particular sampled system cannot describe every Moxos community or all Amazonian diets.

Networks Distinct large centers

The 2022 study identifies Cotoca and Landívar within a differentiated settlement system, not as one combined city.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Food A bounded production study

The 2025 study interprets evidence for maize cultivation in its sampled landscape, not every household's entire diet.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Research Fieldwork complements lidar

DAI records excavation and later mapping phases; mapped extent is not a sovereignty or ethnic boundary.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Casarabe-associated contexts

    This broad classification contains changes; infrastructure cannot make all settlements equally old.

  2. Project excavations

    DAI documents investigations in regional platform settlements before later lidar campaigns.

  3. Lidar study

    The study develops an interpretation of low-density urban networks.

  4. Food-production interpretation

    A landscape study links evidence to maize production while retaining its specific geographical scope.

文化和语言

Food, craft, language, labor, and belief

本简介中命名的语言

  • The registered evidence does not securely establish every resident's spoken language; no language is assigned from material style alone.

语言家庭: No secure assignment from this evidence

Low-density urbanism is not a modern city template.

Water works and household labor belong within political history.

Independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted educational summaries, not reproductions of the cited works or professional scholarly review. Cited communities, museums, researchers, universities, heritage authorities, UNESCO and publishers did not author or endorse this atlas. Names identify sources only; no logos, source imagery, human remains, restricted cultural expressions or sensitive coordinates are reproduced. Public availability does not establish cultural consent. Use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous and community-linked institutions, national heritage authorities, accountable archaeological projects, original studies and institutional collections documentation. Source titles, publishers, dates and stable links identify the evidence. Distinguish a conference abstract, bibliographic record, field study, scholarly synthesis, heritage proposal and completed interpretation. Attribute written and oral accounts by composition date, genre, language, audience, transmission and viewpoint.

  1. C1

    Orinoquia: The Archaeology of the Orinoco River Basin

    Journal of World Prehistory 16, author-shared scholarly synthesis · Attributed scholarly synthesis; models are not direct observations of all communities · 2002

  2. C2

    Chiribiquete National Park: The Maloca of the Jaguar

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Institutional heritage record; individual panel chronology requires separate evidence · Inscribed 2018; record accessed 2026-10-20

  3. C3

    Nuevos aportes a la arqueología del sitio Saladero, bajo Orinoco, Venezuela

    José R. Oliver, UCL, author-shared conference paper · Original conference research; not all interpretations are final consensus · Presented 2013; author record 2014

  4. C4

    A fase Açutuba: um novo complexo cerâmico na Amazônia Central

    Arqueología Suramericana 2(1), World Archaeological Congress archive · Original archaeological study in archived journal issue · 2006

  5. C5

    Early and Middle Holocene Hunter-Gatherer Occupations in Western Amazonia: The Hidden Shell Middens

    PLOS ONE · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2013-08-28

  6. C6

    Paleoindian cave dwellers in the Amazon: research annotation

    Library of Congress, Handbook of Latin American Studies · Institutional critical bibliographic annotation, not a new excavation · 1996 study; annotation accessed 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    Lidar reveals pre-Hispanic low-density urbanism in the Bolivian Amazon

    Nature 606, 325-328 · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2022

  8. C8

    Ecological Modelling and Indigenous Systems of Resource Use: Examples from South Venezuela

    Antropológica 55, 51-72, UNAM archive · Original methodological and ethnographic analysis, not a prehistoric social census · 1981

  9. C9

    Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organized patchiness in Amazonia

    PNAS 107, 7823-7828 · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2010

  10. C10

    The unique functioning of a pre-Columbian Amazonian floodplain fishery

    Scientific Reports · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2018

  11. C11

    Intentional creation of carbon-rich dark earth soils in the Amazon

    Science Advances 9, eadh8499 · Original collaborative research, including Kuikuro Indigenous Association contributors · 2023

  12. C12

    En riesgo continuo por el ecoturismo: la realidad de las áreas protegidas en el Amazonas

    Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia · Protected-area care and access-risk guidance, not visitor permission · 2025-12-12

  13. C13

    Shared Stewardship and Ethical Returns

    Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian · Comparative collections ethics, not site-specific cultural consent · Institutional policy resource accessed 2026-10-20

  14. S1

    Lidar reveals pre-Hispanic low-density urbanism in the Bolivian Amazon

    Nature 606, 325-328 · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2022

  15. S2

    Maize monoculture supported pre-Columbian urbanism in southwestern Amazonia

    Nature 639, 119-123 · Original landscape and food-production study; site scope does not cover all Amazonia · 2025

  16. S3

    Llanos de Mojos

    Deutsches Archäologisches Institut · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · Project record accessed 2026-10-20

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期