Upano, Sangay, and Kilamope settlement networks - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Amazonia and the Orinoco: Rivers, Landscapes, and Living Heritage
Upper Amazonian foothills · Source-reviewed profile

Upano, Sangay, and Kilamope settlement networks

Sangay / Kilamope / Upano Valley (site or scholarly name, not an established ancient self-designation)

Platforms, plazas, paths and agricultural works reveal varied foothill landscapes. Recent mapping builds on earlier excavations and local knowledge rather than discovering an empty valley.

Foothill settlement and connected landscape context Broadly approximately 500 BCE-600 CE for the recent network interpretation; later Huapula phases separate Lidar, excavation, architectural survey, dated ceramics and institutional soil-research records. Macas public town orientation, Ecuador. Approximate public orientation only, never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, political, customary or sovereignty boundary. Not a burial, ancestral-remains, restricted rock-art or sacred-site location, private earthwork, Indigenous village or contact point for isolated peoples; no access or collecting permission is implied.
概览

Communities, landscapes, and the evidence

Rivers, forests, wetlands, and connections

The upper Upano connects foothills and lowlands. A Macas town point is not a settlement boundary, sacred-site pin or territorial claim.

Political organization and community scale

Several centers and connecting works indicate coordinated communities, not a demonstrated homogeneous empire or universal capital.

Colonial transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Regional Upano and later Huapula material phases must remain distinct. Living Shuar and other communities cannot be assigned to archaeological phases or have identities adjudicated here.

Landscape Several built centers

The 2024 project account reports connected platforms and other works, not a single newly discovered city.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Chronology More than one regional phase

The INPC study distinguishes Upano and later Huapula contexts and earlier chronological interpretations.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Methods Soils provide another archive

INPC documents research on anthropogenic soils at Huapula; a conference announcement is not a complete settlement explanation.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Early network development

    The recent account places the interpreted settlement system in a broad chronology rather than dating every platform identically.

  2. Different occupation phases

    The regional study separates Upano and later Huapula-associated materials, not replacement peoples.

  3. Soil investigation presented

    The institutional conference record concerns study of a particular Huapula context.

  4. Regional and lidar accounts

    The publications address changing evidence and interpretations, without erasing earlier research.

文化和语言

Food, craft, language, labor, and belief

本简介中命名的语言

  • The registered evidence does not securely establish every resident's spoken language; no language is assigned from material style alone.

语言家庭: No secure assignment from this evidence

Earlier fieldwork and newer lidar are complementary.

Platform use and political relationships remain research questions.

Independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted educational summaries, not reproductions of the cited works or professional scholarly review. Cited communities, museums, researchers, universities, heritage authorities, UNESCO and publishers did not author or endorse this atlas. Names identify sources only; no logos, source imagery, human remains, restricted cultural expressions or sensitive coordinates are reproduced. Public availability does not establish cultural consent. Use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous and community-linked institutions, national heritage authorities, accountable archaeological projects, original studies and institutional collections documentation. Source titles, publishers, dates and stable links identify the evidence. Distinguish a conference abstract, bibliographic record, field study, scholarly synthesis, heritage proposal and completed interpretation. Attribute written and oral accounts by composition date, genre, language, audience, transmission and viewpoint.

  1. C1

    Orinoquia: The Archaeology of the Orinoco River Basin

    Journal of World Prehistory 16, author-shared scholarly synthesis · Attributed scholarly synthesis; models are not direct observations of all communities · 2002

  2. C2

    Chiribiquete National Park: The Maloca of the Jaguar

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Institutional heritage record; individual panel chronology requires separate evidence · Inscribed 2018; record accessed 2026-10-20

  3. C3

    Nuevos aportes a la arqueología del sitio Saladero, bajo Orinoco, Venezuela

    José R. Oliver, UCL, author-shared conference paper · Original conference research; not all interpretations are final consensus · Presented 2013; author record 2014

  4. C4

    A fase Açutuba: um novo complexo cerâmico na Amazônia Central

    Arqueología Suramericana 2(1), World Archaeological Congress archive · Original archaeological study in archived journal issue · 2006

  5. C5

    Early and Middle Holocene Hunter-Gatherer Occupations in Western Amazonia: The Hidden Shell Middens

    PLOS ONE · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2013-08-28

  6. C6

    Paleoindian cave dwellers in the Amazon: research annotation

    Library of Congress, Handbook of Latin American Studies · Institutional critical bibliographic annotation, not a new excavation · 1996 study; annotation accessed 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    Lidar reveals pre-Hispanic low-density urbanism in the Bolivian Amazon

    Nature 606, 325-328 · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2022

  8. C8

    Ecological Modelling and Indigenous Systems of Resource Use: Examples from South Venezuela

    Antropológica 55, 51-72, UNAM archive · Original methodological and ethnographic analysis, not a prehistoric social census · 1981

  9. C9

    Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organized patchiness in Amazonia

    PNAS 107, 7823-7828 · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2010

  10. C10

    The unique functioning of a pre-Columbian Amazonian floodplain fishery

    Scientific Reports · Original archaeological study or institutional project account · 2018

  11. C11

    Intentional creation of carbon-rich dark earth soils in the Amazon

    Science Advances 9, eadh8499 · Original collaborative research, including Kuikuro Indigenous Association contributors · 2023

  12. C12

    En riesgo continuo por el ecoturismo: la realidad de las áreas protegidas en el Amazonas

    Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia · Protected-area care and access-risk guidance, not visitor permission · 2025-12-12

  13. C13

    Shared Stewardship and Ethical Returns

    Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian · Comparative collections ethics, not site-specific cultural consent · Institutional policy resource accessed 2026-10-20

  14. S1

    Deux mille ans d'urbanisme à jardins en haute Amazonie

    Archéologie des Amériques, CNRS and Université Paris 1 · Original project publication account of Science research · 2024

  15. S2

    Regional archaeological research in the Upano basin

    Instituto Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Strata · Institutional archaeological study, differing regional chronologies preserved · 2023

  16. S3

    INPC participará en IX Reunión de Teoría Arqueológica de América del Sur

    Instituto Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural · Original institutional research announcement; no claim that a proposal proves its hypothesis · Institutional conference record accessed 2026-10-20

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期