Riwi and Kimberley craft and occupation contexts - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Deep History of Australia: Country, Communities, and Living Heritage
Southern Kimberley · Source-reviewed profile

Riwi and Kimberley craft and occupation contexts

Riwi

Riwi's sequence records changing shelter use at the desert's edge. Bone working and fibre remains broaden a record that stone objects alone would make incomplete.

Archaeological occupation and craft context Late Pleistocene to Holocene; selected sequence to 1700 CE Stratified occupation deposits, stone and bone tools, plant fibres, dating, and environmental comparison. Fitzroy Crossing town regional orientation, not the cave; approximate public-institution or regional orientation point only, never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, maritime, sovereignty, native-title, or modern national boundary. Not the location of burials, restricted knowledge, excavation trenches, or permission to enter Country.
概览

Evidence and local histories

Changing landscapes and connections

A desert-margin setting offered changing opportunities and constraints. Gaps in a shelter sequence do not establish regional abandonment.

Social organization and community scale

Intermittent shelter use and craft do not identify a centralized ancient government. Published work's community and Country associations are not a membership decision.

Living heritage, later transformation, and care

The ANU research account identifies Riwi with Mimbi Country. Public archaeological summaries cannot replace community authority or infer individual relationships to Country.

Settlement Long-term but intermittent use

The archaeological study distinguishes episodes of occupation, avoiding a claim of uninterrupted residence in one shelter.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Craft Bone tools expand the picture

The ANU account describes tools from Riwi and their research significance, not an evolutionary ladder among communities.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Organic evidence Twisted fibres survive selectively

Comparative excavation research records fibre work at Riwi and Carpenters Gap, materials often absent from older deposits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Shelter used at the desert margin

    Occupation deposits provide a local sequence within broader Kimberley histories.

  2. Activities and use intensity vary

    The study describes repeated use with interruptions rather than a single continuous camp.

  3. Fibre work documented

    Specialist analysis identifies manufactured organic material alongside more durable objects.

  4. Bone-tool research communicated

    ANU reports research on the assemblage and its regional significance.

文化和语言

Food, craft, landscapes, and knowledge

本简介中命名的语言

  • Earlier spoken languages cannot be identified from these archaeological objects alone.

语言家庭: Language relationships require dated linguistic evidence; material styles are not language families or biological populations.

Bone-working technologies

Fibre preservation and missing organic evidence

Intermittent use and environmental change

Cited Traditional Owners, researchers, museums, governments, AIATSIS, and UNESCO did not author or endorse this atlas. These are original attributed summaries, not community-approved cultural knowledge or legal advice. No artifact, art, burial, sacred-site, or human-remains imagery is included. Respect Indigenous cultural and intellectual property, access restrictions, and community authority; use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prioritize public Traditional Owner and community-controlled sources alongside accountable archaeological studies, museums, and heritage authorities. Compare dated evidence and interpretation rather than treat a heritage summary or one publication as an uncontested account.

  1. C1

    The AIATSIS Map of Indigenous Australia

    AIATSIS · Institutional heritage resource · Undated; accessed 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    Indigenous water

    Zena Cumpston; Australia State of the Environment · Indigenous-authored environmental synthesis · 2021

  3. C3

    AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research

    Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Indigenous research ethics framework · 2020

  4. C4
  5. C5

    Radiocarbon dating of human occupation of Australia prior to 40 ka BP: Successes and pitfalls

    Quaternary Science Reviews; University of California repository · Peer-reviewed dating study · 2001

  6. C6

    Mabuygiw Garkaziw Kupay Torres Strait Islander Corporation

    MGK, community-controlled organization · Institutional heritage resource · Undated; accessed 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    World Heritage

    Budj Bim Cultural Landscape Tourism, Gunditjmara owned · Institutional heritage resource · Undated; accessed 2026-10-20

  8. C8

    Brewarrina Aboriginal Fish Traps (Baiame's Ngunnhu)

    Australian Government, DCCEEW · National Heritage record · Updated 2026-03-19

  9. C9

    Walking in the footsteps of our ancestors

    Mungo National Park and Traditional Tribal Groups · Institutional heritage resource · Undated; accessed 2026-10-20

  10. C10

    Third anniversary of destruction at Juukan Gorge

    PKKP Aboriginal Corporation · Traditional Owner heritage statement · 2023-05

  11. S1

    Long-term occupation on the edge of the desert: Riwi Cave in the southern Kimberley, Western Australia

    ANU repository; Archaeology in Oceania · Peer-reviewed archaeological study · 2018 online; 2019 journal issue

  12. S2

    Bone tools found in Kimberley among oldest in Australia

    Australian National University · University research communication · 2021

  13. S3

    Fibre technologies in Indigenous Australia: Evidence from archaeological excavations in the Kimberley region

    Australian Archaeology; Australian National University repository · Peer-reviewed archaeological study · 2022

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期