Morel and Guadeloupean craft and material histories
Le Moule, Guadeloupe (source place-name, not an ancient self-designation)
Craft research asks how shell, stone, and reused pottery actually worked. Material choices and skilled practice complicate a style-only history. These studies do not license reconstruction of restricted cultural knowledge or an unsupported ethnic migration story.
Communities, landscapes, and the evidence
Island landscapes and connections
Grande-Terre's coastal communities connected local resource use and island exchange. Le Moule is a public town orientation, not the deposits. This is an archaeological landscape, not a mapped homeland or jurisdiction.
Political organization and community scale
Tool-use evidence concerns work and choices, not a demonstrated centralized political institution.
Colonial transformation, living heritage, and modern reception
Research and heritage documentation highlight both the value and vulnerability of archaeological context. Old collections and modern experiments have different limits. Living heritage relationships require community authority; this profile cannot decide identity, recognition, descent, or membership.
Functional research compares shell, stone, and flint in Morel and Anse à la Gourde.
Experiments and wear traces suggest some sherds served pottery-making tasks.
The proceedings situate threatened archaeological resources within a Caribbean preservation agenda.
简洁、来源化的时间表
这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.
-
Tools in local work
Material and wear studies address practical activities rather than styles alone.
-
Pottery reuse
Selected abraded sherds preserve evidence interpreted as working leather-hard clay.
-
Regional heritage discussion
The proceedings document a conservation agenda, not UNESCO inscription of every discussed site.
Food, craft, language, work, and belief
本简介中命名的语言
- Spoken languages are not established by this site's material record
语言家庭: Unresolved for the archaeological context
Broken pottery could acquire a second working life.
Use-wear interpretation requires experiment and contextual comparison.
Independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted educational summaries, not reproductions of the cited works or professional scholarly review. Cited communities, museums, researchers, universities, National Trusts, heritage authorities, UNESCO, and the National Park Service did not author or endorse this atlas. Names identify sources only; no logos, source imagery, human remains, restricted cultural expressions, or sensitive coordinates are reproduced. Public publication does not establish cultural consent. Use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.
询问此已审查的配置文件
该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。
AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。
阅读完整说明
继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。
本页使用的来源
Prefer Caribbean heritage authorities, Indigenous and community perspectives, accountable excavation projects, original archaeological studies, and institutional collections documentation. Attribute written and oral accounts by date, genre, language, audience, and viewpoint. Historical inventories, tentative nominations, catalog records, and full excavation reports are not interchangeable.
-
C1
Caribbean Archaeology and World Heritage Convention (World Heritage Papers 14)
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Regional archaeological and heritage proceedings; historical inventory, not current inscription status · 2005
-
C2
Teaching Indigenous History and Heritage: A Guide for Teachers in the Caribbean
Eldris Con Aguilar and Corinne L. Hofman; NEXUS1492, Leiden University · Educational research guide; cited for evidence methodology, not reproduced or adapted · 2017
-
C3
Bringing Taíno Peoples Back Into History
Leiden University, NEXUS1492 · Institutional account of living heritage and Smithsonian exhibition · 2018-08-27
-
C4
Caribbean Ties: Connected People, Then and Now
NEXUS1492, Leiden University and Caribbean partners · Collaborative archaeological outreach publication · 2019
-
C5
Caribbean encounters: rescue excavations at the early colonial Island Carib site of Argyle, St. Vincent
Corinne L. Hofman and Menno L. P. Hoogland; Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, Leiden University · Original archaeological research contribution · 2012
-
C6
Late Precolonial Culinary Practices: Starch Analysis on Griddles from the Northern Caribbean
Andy J. Ciofalo and colleagues; Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · Original peer-reviewed microbotanical study · 2019
-
C7
Lucayan charred wood selection patterns: a comparative study of variability in fragile island ecosystems of the central and northern Bahamas
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany; Springer Nature · Original peer-reviewed wood-use and chronological study · 2024
-
C8
Archaeological History, Memory, and Heritage at the White Marl Site, Central Village, St Catherine Parish, Jamaica
Caribbean Quarterly; Taylor & Francis · Original community and heritage research · 2023
-
S1
Tracing Traces from Present to Past: A Functional Analysis of Pre-Columbian Shell and Stone Artefacts from Anse à la Gourde and Morel, Guadeloupe, FWI
Yvonne Lammers-Keijsers; Leiden University Press · Original doctoral research, publisher synopsis · 2007
-
S2
Were they used as tools? An exploratory functional study of abraded potsherds from two pre-colonial sites on the island of Guadeloupe, northern Lesser Antilles
Annelou van Gijn and Corinne L. Hofman; Caribbean Journal of Science · Original experimental and use-wear research · 2008
-
S3
Caribbean Archaeology and World Heritage Convention (World Heritage Papers 14)
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Regional archaeological and heritage proceedings; historical inventory, not current inscription status · 2005
Editorial review: October 20, 2026