Kara-Bom and Initial Upper Palaeolithic technologies
Kara-Bom
Layered open-air deposits preserve changing stone-reduction practices and occupation phases beyond the better-known cave record.
Landscapes, communities, and changing institutions
Rivers, lakes, forests, steppe, mountains, and Arctic connections
Intermontane basins and upland routes connected stone resources and repeated occupations.
Political organization and community scale
Technical learning and work areas indicate organization; a named people or centralized state is not recoverable.
Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception
New dating can alter regional models. Material change establishes neither modern identity nor one continental dispersal route.
Production does not identify language or people.
Phases should not be collapsed into one camp.
Ages need method, calibration, and uncertainty.
简洁、来源化的时间表
这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.
Livelihoods, material evidence, and language limits
本简介中命名的语言
- No directly attested local language
语言家庭: Not recoverable from material styles alone
Blade production
Open-air occupation
Revisable dates
DNA Genics prepared this AI-assisted educational synthesis from the attributed sources. It was not authored or endorsed by those researchers or institutions. Living communities define their own identities; source corrections can be raised through the site's contact channel.
询问此已审查的配置文件
该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。
AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。
阅读完整说明
继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。
本页使用的来源
Use accountable excavation reports, institutional collections, academic chronologies, and Indigenous-rights resources. Original prose is linked to registered sources. Source inclusion does not imply endorsement. Do not use Wikipedia as a registered source.
-
C1
Timing of archaic hominin occupation of Denisova Cave in southern Siberia
Jacobs et al., Nature · Peer-reviewed dating study · 2019
-
C2
Long-distance exchange of obsidian in the High Arctic during the Early Holocene
Pitulko et al., Antiquity · Primary obsidian-provenancing study · 2019
-
C3
A freshwater old carbon offset in Lake Baikal, Siberia and problems with the radiocarbon dating of archaeological sediments
Nomokonova et al., Quaternary International · Peer-reviewed reservoir-effect study · 2013
-
C4
New Radiocarbon Dates and a Review of the Chronology of Prehistoric Populations from the Minusinsk Basin, Southern Siberia, Russia
Svyatko et al., Radiocarbon · Peer-reviewed dating study · 2009
-
C5
Reindeer Imagery in the Making at Ust'-Polui in Arctic Siberia
Losey et al., Cambridge Archaeological Journal · Peer-reviewed image and animal-relations study · 2021
-
C6
The Indigenous World 2026: Russia
International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs · Indigenous-rights organization report · 2026
-
C7
Uyuk Tarlak inscription
Uppsala University, Database of Turkic Runiform Inscriptions · Reviewed inscription catalogue · Current academic database
-
C8
Baikal Archaeology Project
University of Alberta · University archaeological project · Current project resource
-
C9
Radiocarbon-based approach capable of subannual precision resolves the origins of the site of Por-Bajin
Kuitems et al., PNAS · Peer-reviewed dating study · 2020
-
S1
Burin-core technology and laminar reduction sequences in the initial Upper Paleolithic from Kara-Bom
Zwyns et al., Quaternary International · Peer-reviewed technological study · 2012
-
S2
Dating the Middle-to-Upper-Paleolithic Transition at Kara-Bom
Goebel, Derevianko and Petrin, Current Anthropology · Peer-reviewed dating study · 1993
-
S3
The Northern Dispersal Route: Bioarchaeological Data from the Late Pleistocene of Altai, Siberia
Buzhilova, Derevianko and Shunkov, Current Anthropology · Peer-reviewed archaeological study · 2017
Editorial review: October 19, 2026