Campo Laborde: Megafauna, tools, and dating - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持，请使用打印功能。

Southern South America: Pampas, Patagonia, and Living Heritage
Pampean grasslands · Source-reviewed profile

Campo Laborde: Megafauna, tools, and dating

No securely recorded ancient self-designation is established for this archaeological context.

A giant-sloth processing context links skilled tool use with an important chronological revision. The site's history shows why old dates cannot be repeated without checking later analyses.

Animal processing and chronological-revision context Late Pleistocene processing context; approximately 12,600 calibrated years BP in the 2019 study Stone-tool technology, modified giant-sloth bones, radiocarbon sample treatment and taphonomy. Olavarría public town orientation, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Approximate public orientation only, never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, political, cultural or sovereignty boundary. Not a burial, ancestral-remains, restricted rock-art, sacred-site or private deposit location; no access, excavation or collecting permission is implied.
概览

Landscapes, communities, and the evidence

Landscapes and regional connections

The Tapalqué stream landscape linked water, animals and work; a public-town marker does not locate the private archaeological deposit.

Political organization and community scale

The evidence concerns selected activities, deposits and local community scale, not one centralized government, capital, bounded people or complete account of authority. Tools, mounds, paintings and preservation alone cannot establish political organization.

Colonial encounters, living heritage, and modern reception

Modern research and heritage care differ from ancient occupation. Living Indigenous communities and custodians are not vanished archaeological classifications; this profile neither establishes nor denies automatic continuity, recognition or descent. Cited institutions have not endorsed this atlas.

Chronology Revised late Pleistocene age

The 2019 study places the event around 12,600 calibrated years BP, revising earlier estimates.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Technology Selected tool-use strategies

The 2015 comparative study evaluates acquisition, use and disposal, not the complete economy of a people.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
Interpretation A local event, not all extinctions

The institutional account presents evidence for a processing event without resolving every regional extinction.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Sloth processing

    Modified remains and lithics support the study's kill-and-butchery interpretation.

    [S1]

  2. Younger ages proposed

    The later study explains why earlier chronological estimates require revision.

    [S1]

  3. Technological comparison

    The comparative publication studied the lithic assemblage before the redating.

    [S3]

  4. Chronology reassessed

    New sample treatment changed the interpretation of when the event occurred.

    [S1] [S2]
文化和语言

Food, skilled work, households, and language limits

本简介中命名的语言

  • No secure spoken-language assignment from these archaeological materials alone; later ethnonyms and ethnography cannot identify every earlier resident.

语言家庭: Material styles and site names do not establish language families or a single community identity.

The 2019 study places the event around 12,600 calibrated years BP, revising earlier estimates.

The 2015 comparative study evaluates acquisition, use and disposal, not the complete economy of a people.

Independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted educational summaries, not reproductions of the cited works or professional scholarly review. Cited communities, museums, researchers, universities, heritage authorities, UNESCO and publishers did not author or endorse this atlas. Names identify sources only; no logos, source imagery, human remains, restricted cultural expressions or sensitive coordinates are reproduced. Public availability does not establish cultural consent. Use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。

阅读完整说明

继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer living community institutions, heritage authorities, accountable archaeological projects, original studies and institutional repositories. Repository abstracts and research notices are identified as such, not substituted for complete excavation records. Attribute sample types, dates, units and changing interpretations. Distinguish tentative heritage proposals from inscriptions and modern restitution work from ancient occupation.

  1. C1

    Cronología radiocarbónica

    CONICET, institutional research record · Scholarly bibliographic record and author-supplied abstract, not a new excavation · 2014

  2. C2

    Broken stone tools from Cerro El Sombrero Cima (Tandilia Range, Argentina)

    CONICET Digital, scholarly repository · Institutional archaeological account or original study, with interpretation attributed · 2012-11

  3. C3

    Nuevas evidencias sobre las ocupaciones tempranas en Cerro Casa de Piedra 7

    CONICET, institutional research record · Scholarly bibliographic record and author-supplied abstract, not a new excavation · Undated resource; accessed 2026-10-20

  4. C4

    Micromamíferos, tafonomía y paleoambientes del cuaternario tardío en Tierra del Fuego: Los roedores de Tres Arroyos 1

    Institutional journal via SciELO Chile · Institutional archaeological account or original study, with interpretation attributed · 2020

  5. C5

    Cultura material y procesos interculturales en Sancti Spiritus (1527–1529). Un abordaje arqueológico contextual

    Universidad Nacional de Rosario, archaeological research repository · Fabián C. Letieri and Gabriel Cocco, contextual archaeological study · 2015, Revista del Centro de Estudios de Arqueología Histórica, Año IV, Vol. 4

  6. C6

    Lengua yagán

    Subdirección Nacional de Pueblos Originarios y Tribal Afrodescendiente chileno · Living-language institutional context, not ancient population evidence · Undated resource; accessed 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    Restitución Colección Gusinde

    Museo Territorial Yagan Usi · Institutional restitution and living community stewardship account · Undated resource; accessed 2026-10-20

  8. C8

    Fuentes y distribución de diferentes tipos de obsidianas en sitios arqueológicos del centro-sur de Chile (38–44°S)

    Institutional journal via SciELO Chile · Institutional archaeological account or original study, with interpretation attributed · 2009

  9. S1

    Campo Laborde: A Late Pleistocene giant ground sloth kill and butchering site in the Pampas

    CONICET Digital, scholarly repository · Institutional archaeological account or original study, with interpretation attributed · 2019-03-06

  10. S2

    Nuevas evidencias sobre la extinción de los mamíferos gigantes en América

    CONICET · Institutional archaeological account or original study, with interpretation attributed · 2019-03-14

  11. S3

    Technological Organization in Hunting/Scavenging and Butchering Sites of Megamammals in the Pampa Grasslands (Argentina)

    CONICET Digital, scholarly repository · Institutional archaeological account or original study, with interpretation attributed · 2015-10

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

可选的DNA报告

An optional, separate paid genetic-similarity report covering the broader Americas. It is not a source for the historical profiles in this free atlas.

The Historical Atlas is free and uses no DNA or genetic data. The paid report is separate, and this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, ethnicity, citizenship, recognition, sovereignty or community membership.
View the separate report
继续探索
Southern Pampas Arroyo Seco 2 and early Pampean occupations No securely recorded ancient self-designation is established for this archaeological context. 读取配置文件 Western Santa Cruz highlands Cerro Casa de Piedra 7: Wood, animals, and occupation No securely recorded ancient self-designation is established for this archaeological context. 读取配置文件 Tandilia hills Cerro El Sombrero: Tandilia tools and connections No securely recorded ancient self-designation is established for this archaeological context. 读取配置文件
使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期