Casa Grande: earthen building and irrigated landscapes - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Southwestern North American Worlds: Communities, Water, and Connected Landscapes
Southwestern North America (orientation only) · Source-reviewed profile

Casa Grande: earthen building and irrigated landscapes

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

NPS describes a planned earthen structure and substantial shared labor while leaving its precise purpose unresolved. The history account separates the fourteenth-century building from a late-seventeenth-century written description.

Earthen monument and irrigation-community context Great House approximately fourteenth century CE; longer regional farming background Caliche architecture, canals, settlement features, archival descriptions and community histories Coolidge, Arizona, United States (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, farming, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting or travel permission is implied.
概览

Water, households, connected landscapes, and the evidence

Plateau, river, desert, and borderland connections

Coolidge, Arizona, United States is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. Large-scale construction and irrigation required organized labor, but the exact Great House function remains uncertain.

Political organization and community scale

Large-scale construction and irrigation required organized labor, but the exact Great House function remains uncertain. The Great House is not a proven universal observatory, royal palace or evidence of one centralized Hohokam nation.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Hohokam is used as an archaeological classification, while Huhugam has living O’odham meanings that are not reduced to an extinct race. Later colonial, research and stewardship events are dated separately from the main archaeological context.

Cooperative construction NPS describes a planned earthen structure and substantial shared labor while leaving its precise purpose unresolved.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Later written record The history account separates the fourteenth-century building from a late-seventeenth-century written description.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Cultural responsibilities The foundation document places archaeology and living connections within modern preservation responsibilities, not an ancestry certification.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Canal landscapes

    The NPS synthesis connects cultivation, wild food use and expanding water-management systems.

  2. Great House construction

    NPS places the major standing building in the 1300s without claiming its exact social function is known.

  3. Uneven change

    Regional settlement change has several proposed causes; the source does not establish one universal collapse explanation.

  4. Colonial written description

    The history record dates a written account, not the beginning of knowledge or Indigenous history.

文化和语言

Farming, craft, labor, belief, and collective work

本简介中命名的语言

  • Hohokam is used as an archaeological classification, while Huhugam has living O’odham meanings that are not reduced to an extinct race.

语言家庭: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Caliche architecture, canals, settlement features, archival descriptions and community histories.

Large-scale construction and irrigation required organized labor, but the exact Great House function remains uncertain.

The Great House is not a proven universal observatory, royal palace or evidence of one centralized Hohokam nation.

No artifact, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    The Ancestral Sonoran Desert People

    National Park Service · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2024-06-03

  2. C2

    Our Story

    Huhugam Heritage Center; Gila River Indian Community · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  3. C3

    Las Capas Data Recovery

    Desert Archaeology, Inc. · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  4. C4

    Archaeological Zone of Paquimé, Casas Grandes

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  5. C5

    Upper Cliff Dwelling Construction Sequence

    National Park Service · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  6. C6

    Research: Salmon Ruins

    Salmon Ruins Museum · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    People of Pecos

    National Park Service · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  8. C8

    Pecos

    Pueblo of Jemez · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  9. S1

    The Ancestral Sonoran Desert People

    National Park Service · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2024-06-03

  10. S2

    History & Culture: Casa Grande

    National Park Service · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  11. S3

    Foundation Document: Casa Grande Ruins National Monument

    National Park Service · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期