Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of VM-33
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Hungary in the Late Neolithic era

VM-33
5000 BCE - 4500 BCE
Male
Late Neolithic Tisza Culture in Hungary
Hungary
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

VM-33

Date Range

5000 BCE - 4500 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

J1c2

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Cultural Period

Late Neolithic Tisza Culture in Hungary

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Hungary
Locality Békés County. Vésztő‒Mágori-halom
Coordinates 47.0779, 21.2389
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

VM-33 5000 BCE - 4500 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Late Neolithic Tisza Culture is a significant archaeological culture in Central Europe, particularly centered in present-day Hungary, and is considered an integral part of the broader European Neolithic period. This culture thrived approximately between 5000 and 4500 BCE, following the Körös and preceding the subsequent Bronze Age cultures.

Chronological and Geographical Context

The Tisza Culture primarily occupied the eastern part of the Hungarian Plain, extending into parts of present-day Romania, Serbia, and Slovakia. It was contemporary with other European Neolithic cultures, such as the Vinča and Lengyel cultures, situated in the Balkans and Central Europe, respectively. The culture was named after the Tisza River, which was central to its geographical domain.

Settlement Patterns

The Tisza Culture was characterized by large, fortified settlements, often located on elevated river terraces. These were strategically chosen for their defensive advantages and proximity to fertile flood plains, which were optimal for agriculture. Settlements typically consisted of rectangular, single-roomed houses, constructed from wattle and daub with thatched roofs. The layout suggests a well-organized community structure, possibly indicating social stratification.

Economy and Subsistence

The economy of the Tisza Culture was primarily based on agriculture, supplemented by hunting, fishing, and gathering. The fertile soils of the Hungarian Plain allowed for the cultivation of a variety of crops such as wheat, barley, peas, lentils, and flax. The Tisza people also domesticated animals like cattle, sheep, pigs, and goats, which played a crucial role in their sustenance practices.

Material Culture and Technology

The Tisza Culture is renowned for its pottery, which is distinguished by its elaborate and intricate designs. The ceramics were often decorated with incised, painted, or burnished motifs, demonstrating a sophisticated aesthetic sense. Other notable aspects of material culture include polished stone tools, antler implements, and bone artifacts, reflecting advanced technological skills.

Social Structure and Organization

Archaeological evidence suggests that the Tisza Culture was organized into complex social units. The presence of large communal buildings in some settlements indicates potential centers for social or ritual activities, implying an organized societal structure. However, the degree of hierarchy or centralization is still a subject of scholarly debate.

Religion and Rituals

Little is conclusively known about the religious beliefs of the Tisza Culture, but various artifacts suggest ritualistic practices. Clay figurines, often anthropomorphic or zoomorphic, have been found in many sites, possibly serving as religious idols or tokens in fertility rites. Burial practices indicate variability, with some graves containing rich goods, suggesting belief systems related to the afterlife or social status.

Interaction with Neighboring Cultures

The Tisza Culture engaged in extensive interactions with neighboring cultures, as evidenced by the exchange of goods and shared technological innovations. This is seen in the similarities between Tisza pottery and that of adjacent cultural groups like the Vinča. Such interactions were facilitated by the network of rivers, which acted as natural trade routes.

Decline and Legacy

By around 4500 BCE, the Tisza Culture began to decline, likely due to a combination of climatic changes, resource depletion, and interactions with emerging cultures. However, the legacy of the Tisza Culture persisted in the subsequent evolution of European societies, influencing later Bronze Age cultures through its advancements in agriculture, social organization, and material culture.

In summary, the Late Neolithic Tisza Culture of Hungary was marked by advanced agricultural practices, distinctive artistic expressions, and a complex social structure. Its contributions to the European Neolithic are enduring, reflecting a vibrant chapter in the prehistoric era of Central Europe.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians

Authors Maróti Z, Neparáczki E, Schütz O
Abstract

Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians were migration-period nomadic tribal confederations that arrived in three successive waves in the Carpathian Basin between the 5th and 9th centuries. Based on the historical data, each of these groups are thought to have arrived from Asia, although their exact origin and relation to other ancient and modern populations have been debated. Recently, hundreds of ancient genomes were analyzed from Central Asia, Mongolia, and China, from which we aimed to identify putative source populations for the above-mentioned groups. In this study, we have sequenced 9 Hun, 143 Avar, and 113 Hungarian conquest period samples and identified three core populations, representing immigrants from each period with no recent European ancestry. Our results reveal that this "immigrant core" of both Huns and Avars likely originated in present day Mongolia, and their origin can be traced back to Xiongnus (Asian Huns), as suggested by several historians. On the other hand, the "immigrant core" of the conquering Hungarians derived from an earlier admixture of Mansis, early Sarmatians, and descendants of late Xiongnus. We have also shown that a common "proto-Ugric" gene pool appeared in the Bronze Age from the admixture of Mezhovskaya and Nganasan people, supporting genetic and linguistic data. In addition, we detected shared Hun-related ancestry in numerous Avar and Hungarian conquest period genetic outliers, indicating a genetic link between these successive nomadic groups. Aside from the immigrant core groups, we identified that the majority of the individuals from each period were local residents harboring "native European" ancestry.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26