Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

C2A1A3A1

Y-DNA Haplogroup C2A1A3A1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig C2A1A3A1

Origins and Evolution

Y‑DNA haplogroup C2A1A3A1 is a terminal subclade within the broader C2 (C‑M217) lineage. The parent clade C2A1A3A appears to have emerged on the Central–East Asian steppe in the late Holocene (~2.0 kya), and C2A1A3A1 represents a more recent split from that lineage, likely forming within the last ~1,200 years (early medieval period). This pattern — a recent branching inside a regionally concentrated C2 radiation — is consistent with male‑line founder effects produced by localized clan expansion and historic nomadic population movements on the Mongolian and Siberian steppe.

Evidence from population surveys and comparative phylogenetics places C2A1A3A1 among the set of C2 subclades that show strong geographic association with Mongolic and Tungusic speakers; these groups have repeatedly carried C2‑derived lineages in high frequencies compared with neighboring populations. Ancient DNA sampling across northern Eurasia remains incomplete, so exact dating and branching order rely on modern phylogenies calibrated with known mutation rates and limited ancient samples.

Subclades (if applicable)

As a downstream branch, C2A1A3A1 may have its own micro‑substructure in deep sequencing studies (private SNPs and short‑range STR clusters) reflecting clan or pedigree-level expansions. Published datasets commonly group C2A1A3A1 with closely related subclades under the C2A1A3A umbrella; targeted high‑coverage sequencing would be required to robustly resolve internal subclades, identify star‑like expansions, and estimate the timing of any rapid population growth events.

Geographical Distribution

C2A1A3A1 is concentrated on the Central–East Asian steppe and adjacent Siberian regions. It is most frequently observed among Mongolic‑speaking populations (e.g., various Mongol groups, Buryats, Kalmyks) and among Tungusic peoples (e.g., Evenks, Evens, Oroqen), with important representation in Yakut (Sakha) and other North Siberian groups. Lower‑frequency occurrences are reported in some southern Siberian Turkic groups (Tuvans, certain Altai and Kazakh clans) and at sporadic low levels in Northeast Asian populations such as Koreans and Japanese. Very rare traces in some Indigenous North American groups have been reported historically, reflecting either deep Beringian affinities of C2 lineages or later historical contact, but these occurrences are uncommon.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The distribution and apparent timing of C2A1A3A1 are consistent with late‑Holocene nomadic dynamics on the steppe: mobile pastoralism, clan consolidation, and medieval political expansions (including phenomena associated with Göktürk, Mongolic confederations, and later the Mongol Empire). In demographic terms, C2 subclades have sometimes produced strong patrilineal founder effects — single male founders or small elite lineages expanding rapidly — producing high local frequencies in certain clans or tribal groups. While some high‑profile C2 lineages in the literature have been linked to historical male founders (in a few cases controversially to specific figures), there is no direct genetic evidence tying C2A1A3A1 to any single named historical individual; instead, its significance lies in reflecting the broader pattern of medieval nomadic expansions and clan‑level social structure across northern Eurasia.

Conclusion

C2A1A3A1 is a regionally important, relatively recent branch of the C2 (C‑M217) family that helps trace male‑line continuity and demographic processes on the Mongolian–Siberian steppe during the last one to two millennia. It typifies how Y‑chromosome subclades can record localized founder events, cultural‑historical expansions, and the interface of different northern Eurasian peoples (Mongolic, Tungusic, Turkic, and Siberian groups). Ongoing dense SNP sequencing and further ancient DNA sampling across the steppe and adjacent regions will refine its internal structure, precise age, and historical role.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis C2A1A3A1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 C2A1A3A1 Aktuell ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,200 Jahre 0 0 0
2 C2A1A3A ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 2 2 0
3 C2A1A3 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 1 3 0
4 C2A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 4 3 0
5 C2A1 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 3 0
6 C2A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 1 38 0
7 C2 ~40,000 years ago Paleolithic 40,000 Jahre 2 99 24
8 C ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 3 406 35

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Central–East Asia (Mongolian–Siberian steppe)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A3A1 is found include:

  1. Mongolic-speaking groups (e.g., Mongols, Buryats, Kalmyks)
  2. Tungusic peoples of Siberia (e.g., Evenks, Evens, Oroqen)
  3. Yakut (Sakha) and other North Siberian populations
  4. Southern Siberian Turkic groups (e.g., Tuvans, selected Altai and Kazakh clans)
  5. Selected Northeast Asian populations at low frequency (e.g., Koreans, Japanese)
  6. Very rare or isolated traces in some Indigenous North American groups

Regionale Präsenz

Northeast Asia / South Siberia High
Central Asia Moderate
East Asia (northern China, Korea) Low
Northern Asia (Siberia) High
North America (rare/isolated) Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~1.2k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe C2A1A3A1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig C2A1A3A1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu C2A1A3A1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Boisman China_AmurRiverBasin_LatePaleolithic Irkutsk Culture Late Medieval Mongolian Medieval Kazakh Medieval Khuvsgul Mongol Russia_AltaiKrai_N Russia_AltaiKrai_N_Itkul Russia_EN_Kitoi Sukhbaatar Culture Ukraine_LateMedieval_Nogai Umungobi Medieval
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-15
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.