Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

O2A1B1A1A

Y-DNA Haplogroup O2A1B1A1A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig O2A1B1A1A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup O2A1B1A1A is a subclade of O2A1B1A1, which itself belongs to the broader haplogroup O2, one of the major paternal lineages of East Asia. Given its phylogenetic position, O2A1B1A1A likely arose during the late Neolithic or early Bronze Age, after the initial diversification of O2-related lineages within East Asian populations.

The broader O2 radiation is strongly associated with demographic growth, farming expansions, and population structure changes across East Asia during the Holocene. As a downstream branch, O2A1B1A1A probably reflects one of the many localized lineages that emerged as East Asian populations expanded, differentiated, and admixed across China and neighboring regions.

Subclades

As an intermediate or terminal subclade within a larger O2 lineage, O2A1B1A1A is expected to have limited deeper branching compared with older ancestral clades. Public phylogenies may not yet show extensive downstream resolution, but its placement indicates descent from a lineage with strong continuity in East Asian paternal history.

This haplogroup should be viewed in the context of its parent clade O2A1B1A1, with the following broader relationships:

  • O2: major East Asian paternal macrolineage
  • O2A1B1 and O2A1B1A: more localized descendant branches within East Asia
  • O2A1B1A1A: a further derived lineage likely shaped by regional founder effects and historical population movement

Geographical Distribution

The distribution of O2A1B1A1A is expected to be concentrated in East Asia, especially in populations with ancestry connected to the large O2-bearing demographic expansions of the past several millennia. It is most plausibly found at low to moderate frequencies in Han Chinese, especially in southern and central China, and may also appear in adjacent populations of Korea, Japan, Taiwan, mainland Southeast Asia, and the Himalayan fringe.

Because this is a relatively downstream lineage, its exact frequency will vary substantially by locality and sample set. Like many O2 subclades, its presence may reflect both ancient regional continuity and later historical dispersals.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Haplogroup O2A1B1A1A is best understood as part of the paternal genetic landscape associated with the rise and spread of East Asian agricultural and state-level societies. While no single archaeological culture can be assigned to this specific subclade with confidence, its broader phylogenetic neighborhood is often discussed in relation to Neolithic China, post-Neolithic demographic expansions, and the historical movement of peoples across East and Southeast Asia.

In a cultural-historical context, lineages within O2 are frequently associated with the spread of Sinitic-speaking, Austroasiatic, Austronesian, Korean, Japanese, and Tibeto-Burman populations, though these associations are broad and not exclusive. The haplogroup's significance lies less in a single migration event and more in its role as one branch of the highly successful paternal clades that expanded with agriculture, population density, and later social complexity in East Asia.

Conclusion

O2A1B1A1A is a derived East Asian Y-DNA lineage nested within the large and historically important O2 paternal clade. Its origin is most plausibly placed in East Asia about 5,000 years ago, with present-day occurrences expected primarily among populations of China and neighboring regions. As with many downstream O2 branches, it likely reflects a combination of regional founder effects, Holocene population growth, and historical migrations across East and Southeast Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis O2A1B1A1A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 O2A1B1A1A Aktuell ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 25 0
2 O2A1B1A1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 1 25 0
3 O2A1B1A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 1 25 0
4 O2A1B1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 27 0
5 O2A1B ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 27 0
6 O2A1 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 34 0
7 O2A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 381 12
8 O2 ~35,000 years ago Paleolithic 35,000 Jahre 2 388 12
9 O ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 553 6
10 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup O2A1B1A1A is found include:

  1. Han Chinese and other East Asian populations
  2. Southern Chinese and adjacent mainland Southeast Asian populations
  3. Southeast Asian populations, including Thai, Vietnamese, and Austroasiatic-speaking groups
  4. Austronesian-speaking populations, especially in Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia
  5. Korean and Japanese populations
  6. Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations in East Asia and the Himalayas

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Asia High
East Asia (Southern China) Moderate
South Asia Low
Island Southeast Asia / Near Oceania Low
Southeast Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe O2A1B1A1A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig O2A1B1A1A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu O2A1B1A1A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Chinese Henan_Wangchenggang Vietnamese Neolithic
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.