Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

O2B1

Y-DNA Haplogroup O2B1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig O2B1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup O2B1 is a subclade of O2B, which itself belongs to the major East Asian paternal macro-haplogroup O. As an intermediate branch, O2B1 represents a more specific layer of diversification within the broader O2 radiation that shaped the paternal history of East and Southeast Asia.

Based on its phylogenetic position and the distribution of its parent clade, O2B1 most likely arose in East Asia during the late Upper Paleolithic to early Holocene, with its main population expansions occurring later, especially during the Neolithic and Bronze Age periods. Like many subclades of O2, its present-day frequency patterns are strongly influenced by population growth, agricultural dispersals, and repeated migrations among Han Chinese and neighboring populations.

Subclades

As an intermediate haplogroup, O2B1 connects broader O2B ancestry to more derived downstream lineages. The exact internal structure can vary depending on the resolution of testing and the phylogenetic framework used, but it generally serves as a branch from which multiple more recent lineages descend.

Important points about its subclade context:

  • It is downstream of O2B and upstream of younger descendant branches.
  • It is part of the larger O-M95 / O2-related East Asian paternal landscape in many classification systems, though nomenclature and placement can differ slightly across studies and databases.
  • Its diversity is best understood in the context of regional demographic expansions rather than a single known founder event.

Geographical Distribution

O2B1 is found primarily in East Asia and adjacent regions, with its strongest representation among Han Chinese and related mainland East Asian populations. It is also present at lower to moderate frequencies in a wide range of populations across the broader East Asian sphere.

Commonly observed regions include:

  • China, especially southern and central regions where O lineages are often common
  • Korea and Japan, where East Asian paternal lineages are present alongside other regional haplogroups
  • Mainland Southeast Asia, including Thai, Vietnamese, and neighboring populations
  • Austroasiatic-speaking groups, reflecting deep regional mixing and migration history
  • Austronesian-speaking populations, especially in Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia
  • Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations in parts of China and the Himalayas

Historical and Cultural Significance

The distribution of O2B1 is consistent with the broader history of East Asian population formation, including the rise of Neolithic farming societies, language dispersals, and later state-level demographic expansions in China and surrounding areas.

Its present-day pattern is especially informative for understanding:

  • Han Chinese population growth and southward expansion
  • Gene flow between northern and southern East Asian populations
  • The complex genetic layering of Southeast Asian and island Southeast Asian populations
  • Interactions among speakers of Sino-Tibetan, Austroasiatic, and Austronesian languages

Although no single archaeological culture can be uniquely assigned to O2B1 with certainty, its broader parent clades are often associated with Neolithic East Asian agricultural expansions and the later demographic transformations that accompanied the spread of farming, metallurgy, and state formation.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup O2B1 is an important East Asian paternal lineage that reflects the deep internal diversification of haplogroup O in East and Southeast Asia. Its distribution among Han Chinese and neighboring populations points to a history shaped by prehistoric expansion, regional admixture, and the long-term demographic growth of agricultural and historically connected populations across mainland and island East Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis O2B1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 O2B1 Aktuell ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 0 1 0
2 O2B ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 1 1 3
3 O2 ~35,000 years ago Paleolithic 35,000 Jahre 2 388 12
4 O ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 553 6
5 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup O2B1 is found include:

  1. Han Chinese and other East Asian populations
  2. Southeast Asian populations, including Thai, Vietnamese, and Austroasiatic-speaking groups
  3. Austronesian-speaking populations, especially in Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia
  4. Korean and Japanese populations
  5. Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations in East Asia and the Himalayas
  6. Southern Chinese and adjacent mainland Southeast Asian populations

Regionale Präsenz

Northeast Asia High
East Asia Moderate
Southeast Asia Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Southeast Asia Moderate
Island East Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  2. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe O2B1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig O2B1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu O2B1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

China_BA_Roman China_Baligang_LN_Longshan Chinese Island Southeast Asian Culture Late Neolithic Chinese Upper Yellow River Culture West Liao River Culture Yellow River Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.