Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1 is a deeply nested subclade within R1a, one of the most prominent paternal lineages across parts of Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and South Asia. Because this branch is extremely downstream and rare, its formation most likely occurred relatively recently in genealogical terms, probably during the Late Bronze Age, Iron Age, or later historic period, when R1a-bearing populations were already widely dispersed.

The broader R1a phylogeny is commonly associated with expansions tied to the Eurasian steppe and subsequent demographic movements into Europe and Asia. However, a lineage at this level of specificity is unlikely to reflect the initial spread of R1a itself; instead, it more probably represents a localized branching event within an existing R1a population, followed by limited survival and inheritance through one or a few paternal lines.

Subclades

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1 is an intermediate-to-terminal branch in a highly resolved R1a lineage chain. At this depth, subclade structure is mainly useful for fine-scale genealogical reconstruction, identifying shared paternal ancestry among closely related lineages, and distinguishing recent founder events from older macro-regional expansions.

Because published sampling for such rare branches is often limited, the immediate phylogenetic neighborhood may not be well represented in public datasets. In practical population-genetic terms, this clade should be interpreted as part of a micro-lineage cluster nested within the broader R1a continuum rather than as a standalone macro-haplogroup with a large independent demographic history.

Geographical Distribution

The geographic distribution of R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1 is expected to be patchy and sparse, with presence concentrated in regions where R1a overall is common. Based on the parent clade context and known R1a distribution patterns, it is most plausibly found in Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, Central Asia, and South Asia, with occasional occurrences in neighboring West Eurasian and Siberian populations.

At this resolution, frequency is generally expected to be very low in any one population. Its observed distribution is more likely to mirror the historical dispersal of its parent clade than to indicate a distinct ethnolinguistic identity.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Broadly speaking, R1a lineages have been linked in the literature to the spread of steppe-associated populations during the Bronze Age, including cultures such as Yamnaya, Corded Ware, and later steppe-derived or steppe-influenced groups. For a rare subclade like R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1, the most defensible interpretation is indirect: it likely descends from a paternal lineage carried within these broad demographic networks, but its own emergence was probably much later than the first major R1a expansions.

The clade may also be found among populations shaped by later historical processes, including Slavic expansions, Baltic regional continuity, Scandinavian gene flow, Indo-Aryan-associated movements in South Asia, and Central Asian admixture networks. In these settings, such a lineage can persist as a rare marker of paternal continuity across shifting linguistic and cultural landscapes.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1 is a highly specific, low-frequency paternal lineage within R1a that is best understood as a product of recent branching and founder effects layered on top of an older steppe-associated ancestry. Its scientific value lies less in defining a large ancient migration and more in refining the fine-scale structure of R1a lineages across Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1 Aktuell ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
6 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
7 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
8 R1A1A1B1A2B3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 158 3
9 R1A1A1B1A2B3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 336 0
10 R1A1A1B1A2B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 359 4
11 R1A1A1B1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 445 0
12 R1A1A1B1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 808 5
13 R1A1A1B1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 1 852 0
14 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
15 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
16 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
17 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
18 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe or the Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Baltic States Low
Western Europe Low
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
West Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A1A2C1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Austria_Avar Avar Culture Early Avar Estonian Bronze Age Hun Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Ingrian Iron Age Culture Legowo Culture Norway_Sund_EBA Russia_Samara_Khazar Viking Viking Denmark
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.