Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B is a highly downstream branch within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits far beneath a large and widely distributed haplogroup, it is best interpreted as a rare local subclade that likely formed through a founder event in a relatively restricted population. Based on the parent lineage context, its formation is most plausibly placed in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian steppe during the late Holocene, around 3 thousand years ago.

The broader R1a lineage is strongly associated with expansions across Eastern Europe, the Pontic-Caspian steppe, Central Asia, and large parts of South Asia. This downstream subclade would therefore be expected to reflect one of the many fine-scale branching events that occurred as R1a-bearing populations diversified and dispersed. Its rarity suggests either limited demographic expansion, survival in small isolated lineages, or both.

Subclades

As an intermediate and very specific branch, R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B may have few currently documented downstream descendants, and its phylogenetic resolution may continue to improve as more high-coverage Y-chromosome sequencing becomes available. In practice, such lineages are often identified through SNP-based testing rather than traditional STR prediction.

Because it is a subclade of a rare sub-branch, it likely represents a narrow genealogical cluster rather than a broad population marker. This makes it valuable for reconstructing recent paternal history, founder effects, and micro-regional migrations within R1a-bearing populations.

Geographical Distribution

The expected distribution of this haplogroup is patchy and low-frequency, with most occurrences likely in regions where R1a is historically common. These include Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, Central Asia, parts of South Asia, and some Iranian-speaking or other West Eurasian populations. In addition, small frequencies may appear in Siberian and Uralic-speaking groups due to historical gene flow and steppe-mediated contacts.

At such a deep subclade level, the lineage is not usually associated with a single modern ethnic group. Instead, it is more informative as a marker of paternal descent within communities shaped by long-range migration, elite dominance, founder effects, and local continuity.

Historical and Cultural Significance

R1a lineages are often discussed in relation to major prehistoric and historic population movements, including steppe expansions, Bronze Age mobilities, and later dispersals across Eurasia. While there is no basis for linking this specific subclade to a single archaeological culture without direct ancient DNA evidence, its phylogenetic position makes it broadly compatible with populations connected to the Corded Ware horizon, later steppe-derived groups, and subsequent regional expansions in Eastern Europe and Asia.

In South Asia, downstream R1a branches are often associated at a broad level with the spread of Indo-Iranian-related paternal lineages, though specific attribution to any one subclade requires direct ancient or modern high-resolution sampling. In Central and Northern Europe, R1a subclades frequently reflect complex processes involving the Bronze Age, Iron Age, and medieval-era population structure.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B is a very rare and highly specific paternal lineage within R1a, likely originating in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian steppe around 3 kya. Its scientific value lies less in broad population labeling and more in tracing fine-scale paternal ancestry, founder events, and the historical movement of R1a-descended male lines across Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
3 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
6 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
7 R1A1A1B1A2B3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 158 3
8 R1A1A1B1A2B3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 336 0
9 R1A1A1B1A2B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 359 4
10 R1A1A1B1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 445 0
11 R1A1A1B1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 808 5
12 R1A1A1B1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 1 852 0
13 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
14 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
15 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
16 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
17 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe or Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Baltic Low
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Central Asia Moderate
South Asia Moderate
West Asia Low
North Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Austria_Avar Avar Culture Early Avar Hun Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Late Antique Norway_Sund_EBA Russia_Samara_Khazar Viking Viking Denmark
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.