Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B2A1A2

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B2A1A2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B2A1A2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2a1a2 is a deeply nested subclade of R1a, one of the most widespread paternal lineages across Eurasia. Its placement within the phylogeny suggests that it emerged after the major Bronze Age expansions associated with steppe-derived populations, probably in the context of male lineages moving through the Pontic-Caspian steppe, forest-steppe, or adjacent eastern European regions.

Because this branch sits several levels below the broader R1a trunk, it likely represents a relatively young lineage in genealogical terms, with an estimated formation around 3 kya. The exact formation date is uncertain and should be interpreted as an approximate phylogenetic estimate rather than a fixed archaeological date. Its distribution pattern is consistent with secondary dispersals from an older R1a source population rather than an origin in a fully isolated local population.

Subclades

As an intermediate and downstream branch, R1a1a1b2a1a2 would be expected to contain one or more yet more recent lineages, though the fine structure may still be under-resolved depending on sampling density and sequencing depth. In practice, such subclades often remain sparse in public datasets until large-scale Y-chromosome sequencing identifies additional branches.

This lineage is phylogenetically related to other R1a descendant clades found across Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, the steppe, Central Asia, and South Asia. Its internal diversification likely reflects founder effects, clan expansions, and regional drift during the late prehistoric and early historic periods.

Geographical Distribution

The distribution of R1a1a1b2a1a2 is expected to be patchy but broad, mirroring the wider R1a pattern while remaining at lower frequencies due to its younger age and narrower ancestry footprint. It is most plausibly encountered in Eastern Europe, especially among populations with substantial R1a ancestry, and in Central and South Asian groups where steppe-associated paternal lines are historically attested.

The lineage may also appear in Scandinavian, Uralic, and West Eurasian populations as a result of historical mobility, medieval population movement, and regional admixture. In South Asia, it would be expected mainly in Indo-Aryan-speaking populations, where many R1a branches reflect ancient and historic male-mediated gene flow.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although a direct archaeological attribution for R1a1a1b2a1a2 is not currently established, its broader phylogenetic context strongly links it to the Bronze Age steppe world and later expansions into Europe and Asia. Related R1a lineages are frequently discussed in relation to the spread of Corded Ware-associated populations, subsequent eastern European and Uralic interactions, and the steppe-mediated dispersal of Indo-Iranian-related paternal ancestry.

This haplogroup should not be interpreted as belonging to a single ethnic group or culture. Instead, it represents a paternal line that traveled across multiple historical horizons, likely moving through networks shaped by mobility, warfare, trade, marriage exchange, and elite dominance. Its presence in diverse modern populations reflects the long-term demographic consequences of those processes.

Conclusion

R1a1a1b2a1a2 is a young, downstream R1a subclade with an origin most plausibly placed in the eastern European / Eurasian steppe zone around the Late Bronze Age. It is best understood as part of the broader R1a expansion history linking eastern Europe, Central Asia, and South Asia, with its present-day distribution shaped by migration, founder effects, and regional population history.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B2A1A2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B2A1A2 Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 84 0
2 R1A1A1B2A1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 213 0
3 R1A1A1B2A1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 214 0
4 R1A1A1B2A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 306 0
5 R1A1A1B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 423 0
6 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
7 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
8 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
9 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
10 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe / Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2a1a2 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Baltic States Moderate
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
West Asia Low
North Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B2A1A2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B2A1A2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B2A1A2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Butkara Culture Jirentaigoukou Culture Loebanr Culture Middle Bronze Ukraine Mongun-Taiga Culture Mtwapa Saka Sintashta Culture Srubnaya Culture Srubnaya-Alakul Tagar Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.