Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B2A1A2C

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B2A1A2C

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B2A1A2C

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2a1a2C is a relatively derived branch within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits deep within an established R1a phylogeny, its origin is best understood in the context of the post-Neolithic expansion of steppe-associated male lineages across Eurasia. The most plausible formation area is eastern Europe or the western Eurasian steppe zone, where R1a diversity is high and where many later subclades likely diversified during the Late Bronze Age or shortly thereafter.

As an intermediate clade, R1a1a1b2a1a2C helps connect a parent branch to more terminal downstream lineages. In population genetics terms, this kind of subclade often reflects a combination of founder effects, regional drift, and expansion from a relatively small male lineage pool associated with mobility, social stratification, and long-distance contact networks.

Subclades

Because this haplogroup is a subclade-level designation, its internal downstream structure may be further resolved by future sequencing and updated phylogenies. Like other R1a branches, it is expected to contain one or more private or regional terminal lineages that may be concentrated in specific populations or family groups.

Geographical Distribution

R1a1a1b2a1a2C is expected to occur at low to moderate frequencies across a wide but discontinuous Eurasian range. Its strongest signal is likely in Eastern Europe, especially among populations with substantial R1a representation such as Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians, and in the Baltic region among Lithuanians and Latvians. Additional occurrences are plausible in Scandinavia, especially in populations with historical gene flow from eastern and central Europe.

Beyond Europe, related R1a branches are also found in Central Asia and in many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations of South Asia, reflecting deep historical movements of steppe-derived paternal lineages into those regions. Smaller or more sporadic presence may occur among Iranian-speaking groups, selected Siberian populations, and Uralic-speaking communities through historical admixture and regional migration.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader R1a phylogeny is strongly associated with the major demographic transformations of the Bronze Age Eurasian steppe, including expansions linked to Corded Ware-related and later steppe-descended populations. While no single archaeological culture can be assigned specifically to R1a1a1b2a1a2C without direct ancient DNA evidence, its placement makes it consistent with mobile pastoralist and warfare-mediated dispersals, as well as subsequent movements during the formation of historic European and South Asian populations.

In Eastern Europe and adjacent regions, descendants of R1a lineages became incorporated into the paternal ancestry of many Slavic, Baltic, Germanic, and Uralic populations through repeated episodes of migration and local expansion. In South Asia, related R1a branches are often discussed in connection with Indo-Iranian population history and the spread of Indo-European languages, although haplogroup presence alone cannot define language or ethnicity.

Conclusion

R1a1a1b2a1a2C is a derived Eurasian steppe-linked Y-DNA subclade whose distribution is shaped by Bronze Age and later demographic expansions. It is most informative as part of the broader R1a radiation, contributing to the paternal genetic landscape of Eastern Europe, Central Asia, South Asia, and surrounding regions.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B2A1A2C. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B2A1A2C Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 84 0
2 R1A1A1B2A1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 84 0
3 R1A1A1B2A1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 213 0
4 R1A1A1B2A1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 214 0
5 R1A1A1B2A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 306 0
6 R1A1A1B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 423 0
7 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
8 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
9 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
10 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
11 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe / Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2a1a2C is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe High
Northern Europe (Baltic/Scandinavia) Moderate
Western Europe (diaspora, low-level) Low
Central/South Asia (rare occurrences) Low
North America (diaspora) Low
South Asia Moderate
West Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B2A1A2C

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B2A1A2C

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B2A1A2C. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Butkara Culture Jirentaigoukou Culture Loebanr Culture Middle Bronze Ukraine Mongun-Taiga Culture Mtwapa Saka Sintashta Culture Srubnaya Culture Srubnaya-Alakul Tagar Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.