Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B2A2A3A1

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A3A1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B2A2A3A1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A3A1 is a very recent downstream branch of the broader R1a paternal lineage. In phylogenetic terms, it sits deep within a lineage associated with Eurasian steppe-related male expansions, which became widespread during the Bronze Age and later periods across much of Europe and Asia. Because this clade is so far downstream, it is best understood as a minor, localized descendant lineage rather than a major macro-haplogroup.

The most plausible origin for this branch is Eastern Europe or the Pontic-Caspian/Eurasian Steppe zone, with a formation time likely in the late Holocene. Given its position within R1a, its emergence is consistent with post-Bronze Age lineage diversification, when larger R1a pools had already spread widely and began producing many regionally restricted subbranches.

Subclades

As a very specific terminal or near-terminal branch, R1A1A1B2A2A3A1 is itself a subclade of a recently formed R1a derivative. In practical population-genetic terms, this means:

  • it is likely defined by one or a small number of private SNPs,
  • it may be extremely rare even within populations where the broader R1a lineage is common,
  • and it may represent a single paternal founder line that expanded locally before remaining geographically limited.

Because highly resolved downstream R1a subclades are often known from targeted sequencing and high-coverage Y-chromosome testing, their true distribution is usually broader than initial public samples suggest, but still far more restricted than ancestral R1a.

Geographical Distribution

The broader R1a phylogeny is common across Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, Central Asia, and South Asia, and this downstream branch is expected to occur in low frequencies within some of those same regions. The strongest likelihood of finding this clade is among:

  • Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  • Lithuanians and Latvians
  • Scandinavians, especially where Eastern European ancestry is present
  • Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and related Central Asian groups
  • Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  • Some Iranian-speaking populations
  • Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking communities

Its patchy distribution is typical of a lineage shaped by founder effects, drift, and historical mobility, rather than by one single cultural horizon alone.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The deeper R1a lineage is strongly associated in population-genetic literature with the steppe-mediated spread of Indo-European-associated male lineages, especially during the Bronze Age. While R1A1A1B2A2A3A1 itself is too derived to be directly assigned to a specific ancient culture without ancient DNA evidence, its ancestry is compatible with the broad historical processes that produced the modern R1a distribution.

Potential cultural contexts for its ancestral branch structure include:

  • Corded Ware-related expansions in prehistoric Europe,
  • Steppe Bronze Age societies such as Sintashta- and Andronovo-related horizons,
  • later Iron Age and historic-era demographic movements across Eastern Europe and Eurasia.

For this specific subclade, the main historical significance is not a direct cultural attribution, but rather its value as a fine-scale marker of paternal descent within a much older and widely dispersed lineage.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B2A2A3A1 is a highly specific, low-frequency R1a subclade most likely originating in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian Steppe during the late Holocene. It exemplifies how major prehistoric paternal expansions can diversify into many localized descendant lines that preserve clues to ancient demographic history at very fine resolution.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B2A2A3A1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B2A2A3A1 Aktuell ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1A1A1B2A2A3A ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1A1A1B2A2A3 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 3 0 0
4 R1A1A1B2A2A ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 3 11 1
5 R1A1A1B2A2 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 2 75 0
6 R1A1A1B2A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 306 0
7 R1A1A1B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 423 0
8 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
9 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
10 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
11 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
12 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe / Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A3A1 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Swedes, Norwegians, and other Scandinavians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and related Central Asian populations
  5. Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe High
Northern Europe (Baltic/Scandinavia) Low
Caucasus & Western Asia Low
South Asia Low
North America (diaspora) Moderate
Baltic Region Moderate
Central Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~2k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B2A2A3A1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B2A2A3A1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B2A2A3A1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Ak-Moustafa Culture Aktogai Culture Kazakh Mys Culture Khovd Multi-Period Krasnoyarsk Culture Maitan Alakul Culture Sarmatian Sarmatian Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.