Lapita archaeological contexts and Teouma - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Deep History of Southeast Asia and Oceania: Communities, States, and Ocean Worlds
Vanuatu and wider western Pacific island networks · Source-reviewed profile

Lapita archaeological contexts and Teouma

Teouma Lapita site, Efate

Pottery, settlement deposits, fishing and farming evidence, exchange materials, and a cemetery at Teouma illuminate early Remote Oceanian settlement while preserving variation, local agency, and ethical limits.

Archaeological classification, island settlement, voyaging, subsistence, exchange, and mortuary context Approximately 1200-800 BCE at Teouma and related early Remote Oceanian contexts, with varied regional chronologies Settlement and cemetery archaeology, dentate-stamped pottery, radiocarbon dating, human remains, faunal and plant evidence, stable isotopes, stone and shell objects, exchange study, and community heritage records Teouma site on Efate; one early settlement and cemetery context, not the origin, capital, or boundary of every Lapita-associated or Pacific community
概览

Evidence, landscapes, community scale, political organization, and connections

Island, river, coastal, highland, and ocean connections

Reefs, rivers, shorelines, gardens, forests, neighboring islands, and open-sea routes shaped settlement and local adaptation across diverse archipelagos.

Political organization and community scale

Voyaging groups, households, kin networks, craft producers, fishers, farmers, and island communities organized settlement, subsistence, exchange, and burial; no centralized Lapita state or uniform ethnic polity is demonstrated.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Teouma and Lapita sites are Vanuatu and wider Pacific heritage under living community and national stewardship. Human remains and burial knowledge require consent and ethical care; archaeology cannot adjudicate ni-Vanuatu, Indigenous Pacific, clan, descent, or personal ancestry.

Classification Lapita archaeological contexts

Pottery and associated evidence, not one people, language, or genetic population.

Reviewed 2026 [S1] [S3]
Reference point Teouma, Efate

One settlement and cemetery, not an origin or territorial boundary.

Current research [S1] [S2]
Sensitive evidence Cemetery and human remains

Research, curation, and communication require community and ethical oversight.

Current heritage practice [S1] [S2]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Early settlement reaches parts of Remote Oceania

    Voyaging communities established settlements in new island settings while adapting subsistence and social practices locally.

  2. Teouma settlement and cemetery are used

    Pottery, food remains, objects, and burials document selected households and mortuary practices with significant ethical responsibilities.

  3. Material practices diversify across islands

    Pottery, subsistence, and exchange changed regionally rather than preserving one uniform Lapita culture or population.

  4. Research and community heritage programs develop

    Excavation, repatriation discussions, festivals, and the national heritage registry expanded public awareness and stewardship.

文化和语言

Households, landscapes, subsistence, labor, language, belief, craft, voyaging, and mobility

本简介中命名的语言

  • No deciphered written language corpus
  • Austronesian-language reconstruction provides comparative linguistic evidence but cannot assign every archaeological resident one language

语言家庭: Austronesian-language historical context treated separately from pottery, biology, and identity

Lapita pottery is a material classification rather than a people.

Voyaging and settlement involved local ecological knowledge and relationships with already connected western Pacific worlds.

Teouma's cemetery cannot represent every early island community and requires ethical stewardship.

Monuments, elite inscriptions, imported objects, burials, and external chronicles are often more visible than households, women, children, farmers, fishers, craftspeople, migrants, enslaved or coerced people, and rural communities. Evidence gaps must not be filled with primitive, isolated, empty-island, foreign-builder, lost-civilization, or one-way-civilization narratives.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous and community heritage organizations, national museums and archaeology authorities, accountable regional institutes, UNESCO records, and peer-reviewed projects. Register inscriptions, oral traditions, chronicles, and external testimony with date, genre, language, audience, and viewpoint. Do not register Wikipedia or add artifact, rock-art, burial, sacred-site, or human-remains imagery without per-file licensing, attribution, community consideration, and ethical review.

  1. C1

    Southeast Asian archaeology and heritage programs

    SEAMEO Regional Centre for Archaeology and Fine Arts · Regional archaeology and heritage institution · Current institutional resource

  2. C2

    The Archaeological Heritage of Niah National Park's Caves Complex

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 2024; current record

  3. C3

    Vanuatu National Heritage Registry

    Vanuatu Cultural Centre · National and community-linked heritage registry · Current institutional resource

  4. C4

    Kuk Early Agricultural Site

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 2008; current record

  5. C5

    Tabon Caves archaeological research

    National Museum of the Philippines · National museum research resource · 2022

  6. C6

    Angkor

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 1992; current record

  7. C7

    Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 2016; current record

  8. C8

    Rapa Nui National Park

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 1995; current record

  9. C9

    Kakadu site of Australia's earliest home

    Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation · Traditional Owner organization and research partnership resource · 2017

  10. C10

    Oc Eo-Ba The archaeological site

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted heritage record · 2022; current tentative-list record

  11. S1

    Vanuatu National Heritage Registry

    Vanuatu Cultural Centre · National and community-linked heritage registry · Current institutional resource

  12. S2

    Archaeology of an early Lapita cemetery and village site at Teouma

    Australian National University · University archaeological project · Research project record

  13. S3

    Lapita diet in Remote Oceania: evidence from Teouma

    Australian National University · Peer-reviewed project publication record · 2014

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: August 5, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期