Jokhang and early Lhasa religious and diplomatic contexts - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Deep History of the Tibetan Plateau and Himalayas: Highlands, Valleys, and Connected Worlds
Lhasa Valley · Source-reviewed profile

Jokhang and early Lhasa religious and diplomatic contexts

Jokhang (Jo khang)

A temple, its changing fabric, and a nearby treaty inscription reveal different forms of royal, religious, and diplomatic evidence. Lhasa was connected to artisans and institutions beyond its valley.

Temple, urban, and diplomatic-inscription context Seventh-fifteenth centuries CE; later rebuilding discussed separately Standing architecture, phased renovation history, sourced institutional accounts, and a contemporary bilingual treaty inscription Jokhang, Lhasa (public sacred-site orientation point); approximate orientation only, never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, religious, cultural, or sovereignty boundary.
概览

Highland landscapes, communities, and changing institutions

Plateau, valley, and connected regional landscapes

Lhasa's valley connected diplomatic and artistic networks. The temple point is not a territorial or religious boundary.

Political organization and community scale

Royal patronage, religious institutions, artisans, and later regional rulers shaped the site. Their roles changed rather than forming an unbroken modern state.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

The shrine remains living religious heritage. Its seventh-century traditions, medieval expansions, and later conservation must be kept chronologically distinct.

Early context a seventh-century temple tradition

Accounts differ over founders and participants.

Source review: 2026-10-19 [S1] [S2]
Diplomacy treaty composed 821-822 and pillar erected 823

The academic edition separates composition from erection.

Source review: 2026-10-19 [S3]
Architecture multiple building and renovation phases

A religious foundation date does not date every surviving wall.

Source review: 2026-10-19 [S1] [S2]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Early temple foundation context

    Institutional sources connect the site with royal patronage, while accounts vary.

  2. Treaty and inscription

    Diplomatic agreements were inscribed near the temple.

  3. Medieval extension

    The institutional history attributes the front extension to Pakmodrupa Drakpa Gyeltsen.

  4. Heritage ensemble extended

    Jokhang joined the existing World Heritage property; the ensemble includes monuments from very different dates.

文化和语言

Households, labor, language, belief, and material evidence

本简介中命名的语言

  • Old Tibetan and Chinese in the treaty inscription
  • Other resident languages not comprehensively recorded

语言家庭: Epigraphic languages describe particular documents, not every resident

Sacred origin traditions are attributed rather than treated as excavation results.

The treaty pillar preserves an institutional diplomatic voice, not a neutral population survey.

DNA Genics prepared this AI-assisted educational synthesis from the attributed sources. It was not authored or endorsed by those researchers or institutions. Living communities and religious custodians retain their own identities and stewardship; source corrections can be raised through the site's contact channel.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer accountable excavation teams, heritage authorities, academic inscription editions, institutional collections, and community-linked conservation projects. Registered sources are HTTPS and exclude Wikipedia. Royal, religious, colonial, and modern national narratives require attribution.

  1. C1

    Archaeology of the Tibetan Plateau

    Anke Hein, Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, Springer · Academic archaeological synthesis · 2018

  2. C2

    Middle and Late Pleistocene Denisovan subsistence at Baishiya Karst Cave

    Xia et al., Nature · Primary archaeological and proteomic study · 2024

  3. C3
  4. C4

    Comment on Permanent human occupation of the central Tibetan Plateau in the early Holocene

    Zhang et al., Science · Published technical challenge to permanent-occupation interpretation · 2017

  5. C5
  6. C6

    Old Tibetan Documents Online

    Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies · Academic manuscript and inscription editions · Texts of the seventh-twelfth centuries; current critical corpus

  7. C7

    Early West Tibetan Buddhist Monuments

    Austrian Academy of Sciences · Textual and architectural research project · Archived research project

  8. C8

    Text, Art and Performance in Bon Ritual

    University of Vienna, CIRDIS · Community-linked ritual and art research · 2012-2016 project

  9. C9

    Preserving earthen architecture: Lessons learned from two case studies

    Fuchs, Milchin and Krist, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · Primary conservation research · 2024

  10. C10

    The Sinja Valley Excavation in 2000 A.D.

    Evans and Gibson with Acharya, Harward and Kunwar, Ancient Nepal 153; University of Cambridge archive · Primary Nepalese-Cambridge excavation report · 2003

  11. S1

    Jokhang

    The Treasury of Lives · Historical institution reference · Current sourced institutional entry

  12. S2

    Historic Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Heritage record; Jokhang context, later Potala distinguished · 1994; extensions 2000 and 2001

  13. S3

    The Sino-Tibetan treaty inscription of 821-822

    Old Tibetan Documents Online, Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa · Contemporary diplomatic inscription in academic edition · Composed 821-822; erected 823; modern critical catalogue

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 19, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期