Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO310
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Turkmenistan in the Chalcolithic era

NEO310
4800 BCE - 4400 BCE
Male
Anau Culture Eneolithic
Turkmenistan
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO310

Date Range

4800 BCE - 4400 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

H14

Y-DNA Haplogroup

L-L1307

Cultural Period

Anau Culture Eneolithic

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Turkmenistan
Locality Monjukli-Depe (Ahai, Kaka)
Coordinates 36.8480, 60.4180
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO310 4800 BCE - 4400 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Anau Culture, which thrived during the Eneolithic or Chalcolithic period, represents a significant prehistoric culture situated in Central Asia, particularly in present-day Turkmenistan. This culture is named after the site of Anau, located near Ashgabat, which serves as a primary archaeological locus for studying this period.

Chronology and Geography:

The Anau Culture is part of the broader Eneolithic period, which generally spans between 4500 and 3500 BCE, marking the transition from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age. This era is characterized by the initial use of copper tools, alongside traditional stone implements. Anau lies within the fertile piedmont region that benefits from proximity to the Kopet Dag mountains, creating a favorable environment for early agricultural societies.

Economy and Subsistence:

The inhabitants of the Anau Culture were primarily agrarian, practicing a mixed economy of farming and animal husbandry. They cultivated a variety of crops, including wheat and barley, which form the bedrock of their subsistence. Irrigation techniques were employed to manage the semiarid conditions, evidencing advanced agricultural practices. Livestock such as sheep, goats, and cattle were raised, providing a secondary food source and raw materials like wool and leather.

Material Culture:

Pottery: A hallmark of the Anau Culture is its distinctive pottery, which exhibits both utilitarian and artistic value. The pottery is often handmade and decorated with geometric designs, featuring red and black color schemes on a buff or reddish background. These motifs potentially held symbolic significance or conveyed cultural narratives.

Metallurgy: As an Eneolithic culture, Anau represents a transitional phase in metal use. Copper artifacts, including small tools and decorative items, indicate burgeoning metalworking skills. However, stone tools and implements remained prevalent.

Architecture: Dwellings in Anau settlements were primarily constructed from mudbrick, a common building material in ancient Central Asian cultures. These structures were often rectangular and sometimes featured multiple rooms, suggesting a degree of social organization and complexity.

Social and Cultural Aspects:

The Anau Culture manifested a complex social structure that can be inferred from burial practices and settlement organization. Graves often contain goods such as pottery, beads, and tools, indicating belief systems concerning the afterlife and possibly status differentiation within the society.

Communal activities and rituals may have played significant roles in their societies, though direct evidence is sparse. However, the presence of communal storage and shared architectural spaces suggest cooperation and social cohesion.

Interaction and Exchange:

The Anau Culture did not exist in isolation. It likely engaged in trade with neighboring regions, as indicated by the acquisition of materials like obsidian and certain metals, which were not locally available. Such exchanges facilitated the dissemination of technological and cultural innovations.

Decline and Legacy:

As the Anau Culture progressed, it increasingly assimilated influences from neighboring cultures transitioning into the Bronze Age, such as the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC). Over time, the distinctive features of Anau culture gave way to more complex societies in the region, which bore greater urban characteristics and expanded metal use.

In conclusion, the Anau Culture epitomizes an essential transitional phase in Central Asian prehistory, laying foundational cultural and technological precedents for subsequent civilizations. Its legacy is encapsulated in archaeological sites and artifacts that continue to provide insight into the formative processes of early settled societies in this part of the world.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26