Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO916
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Neolithic era

NEO916
4438 BCE - 4251 BCE
Male
Ob River Culture of Northern Russia
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO916

Date Range

4438 BCE - 4251 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

H2a2a1

Y-DNA Haplogroup

BT

Cultural Period

Ob River Culture of Northern Russia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Vengerovo-2 (Novosibirsk Oblast, Vengerovsky District)
Coordinates 55.7070, 76.7830
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO916 4438 BCE - 4251 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Ob River Culture of Northern Russia represents a fascinating and somewhat enigmatic chapter in the prehistoric era, associated with the Proto-Siberian cultural groups. This culture emerged around the vast Ob River basin, an area characterized by its sprawling river systems, dense taiga forests, and harsh climate. The Ob River itself, one of the major rivers in Asia, played a crucial role in the lives of the people, as it provided a rich supply of resources and a means of communication and transportation.

Environmental Context

The Ob River area in Northern Russia is defined by its extreme continental climate, with long, harsh winters and short, warm summers. The vast landscape includes taiga forests, tundra, and wetlands, creating a diverse ecosystem that is both challenging and resource-rich. The environment heavily influenced the lifestyle and survival strategies of the Ob River Culture, as they had to adapt to seasonal changes and resource availability.

Subsistence and Economy

The Ob River Culture relied primarily on hunting, fishing, and gathering, reflecting a deep understanding and adaptation to their environment. The river and its tributaries teemed with fish, which became a staple food source. Fishing techniques likely included the use of nets, traps, and spears, adapted to different seasons and water conditions.

In addition to fishing, hunting was crucial for obtaining meat, fur, and other materials. The taiga region supported a variety of game, including elk, deer, and smaller mammals like hares. The use of bows and arrows, as well as traps and snares, would have been common in these pursuits. Gathering provided additional sustenance, with people collecting berries, nuts, and other edible plants seasonally available.

Tools and Technology

The Ob River Culture demonstrated advanced craftsmanship in tool-making, primarily using stone, bone, and wood. Flint knapping was a highly developed skill, producing a range of tools such as scrapers, arrowheads, and knife blades. Bone and antler were often used to create durable tools and ornaments, showcasing detailed workmanship.

Textile production may have been practiced to some extent, using natural fibers from plants or animal sinew. The development and use of boats, possibly dugout canoes or rafts, facilitated fishing and transportation along the riverways, highlighting the importance of the river in the daily life and economy of the culture.

Social Structure and Settlement

Communities of the Ob River Culture were likely small, semi-nomadic groups, moving according to seasonal resources and animal migrations. Settlement patterns would have been influenced by access to water, food, and shelter. During the harsh winters, more permanent dwellings could have been constructed, possibly using wood, sod, and animal hides for insulation.

The social structure was likely organized around family and kinship groups, with roles defined by age, gender, and skill. This community-based approach was essential for survival in the challenging environment, necessitating cooperation in hunting, food distribution, and protection.

Spiritual and Artistic Expression

While direct evidence of spiritual practices is sparse, it is likely that the Ob River Culture engaged in shamanistic traditions common among Proto-Siberian groups. This would involve reverence for natural elements, animals, and ancestral spirits, with rituals, ceremonies, and possibly totemic symbols playing a role in cultural expression.

Artistic expression might have included the creation of carvings, pottery, and possibly petrographs, drawing on themes from nature and mythology. Such artifacts, while rare, suggest a culture rich in symbolic thought and aesthetic appreciation.

Legacy and Influence

The Ob River Culture provides important insights into the adaptation strategies and life of Proto-Siberian peoples. Their deep connection with the environment and adept survival skills are reflective of a broader pattern among hunter-gatherer societies in Northern regions. While much of their history remains shrouded in mystery due to limited archeological evidence, ongoing research continues to shed light on their way of life and contribution to the cultural mosaic of prehistoric Northern Russia.

Overall, the Ob River Culture embodies a harmonious balance between humans and their natural surroundings, characterized by ingenuity, resilience, and a profound understanding of the world they inhabited.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26