Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

O2A1B1A1A1A1E1

Y-DNA Haplogroup O2A1B1A1A1A1E1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig O2A1B1A1A1A1E1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup O2A1B1A1A1A1E1 is a deeply nested subclade within the broader O2 macrohaplogroup, one of the major paternal lineages in East and Southeast Asia. Because it sits downstream of the recently diversified parent clade O2A1B1A1A1A1E, this lineage is best understood as a late Holocene-derived branch that likely emerged in East Asia, most plausibly in or near populations ancestral to Han Chinese and adjacent regional groups.

Its phylogenetic position implies that it did not play a role in the earliest formation of O2, but instead reflects micro-regional branching within an already widespread East Asian Y-chromosome background. Such lineages often arise through population growth, founder effects, local drift, and expansion of agricultural or state-level societies, rather than through very ancient Paleolithic diversification.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal downstream lineage in the provided context, O2A1B1A1A1A1E1 may have few or no widely documented downstream subclades in public datasets. In many Y-DNA lineages of this depth, the major interpretive value lies in its placement as a fine-scale marker of paternal ancestry rather than as a broad continental clade.

Because research coverage for very recent East Asian subbranches can be uneven, its internal branching structure may continue to be refined as more whole Y-chromosome sequencing data becomes available.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to occur at low frequency across parts of East Asia, especially among Han Chinese and closely related populations. It may also be present in surrounding populations due to historical gene flow, including communities in southern China, Korea, Japan, and adjacent mainland Southeast Asia.

Given the broader distribution patterns of O2 subclades, low-level presence in Austronesian-speaking island populations and Tibeto-Burman-speaking groups is plausible, though frequency is likely highly localized and uneven. As with many late-branch East Asian paternal lineages, distribution can be shaped by both ancient demographic expansions and more recent historical mobility.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Haplogroups in the O2 tree are often associated with the demographic history of sinitic expansion, Neolithic-to-Bronze Age population growth, and the later spread of East Asian agricultural and state societies. While O2A1B1A1A1A1E1 itself is too specific to be securely tied to a single archaeological culture, its parentage suggests that it belongs to a broader paternal heritage that became common among populations involved in the development and spread of farming societies in eastern China and neighboring regions.

This lineage may therefore be informative for studies of regional ancestry, surname and clan history, and population substructure within East Asia. In genetic genealogy, such fine-scale subclades are especially useful for distinguishing lineages among populations that share older, more widespread O2 ancestry.

Conclusion

O2A1B1A1A1A1E1 is a recent East Asian Y-DNA subclade reflecting localized diversification within a major paternal lineage that is widespread across East and Southeast Asia. Its significance lies in its value as a high-resolution marker of paternal descent within Han Chinese and neighboring populations, rather than as a major ancient founder lineage.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis O2A1B1A1A1A1E1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 O2A1B1A1A1A1E1 Aktuell ~2,000 years ago Medieval 1,500 Jahre 1 0 0
2 O2A1B1A1A1A1E ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 1 6 0
3 O2A1B1A1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 25 0
4 O2A1B1A1A1A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 1 25 0
5 O2A1B1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 1 25 0
6 O2A1B1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 25 0
7 O2A1B1A1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 1 25 0
8 O2A1B1A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 1 25 0
9 O2A1B1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 27 0
10 O2A1B ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 27 0
11 O2A1 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 34 0
12 O2A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 381 12
13 O2 ~35,000 years ago Paleolithic 35,000 Jahre 2 388 12
14 O ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 553 6
15 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup O2A1B1A1A1A1E1 is found include:

  1. Han Chinese and related East Asian populations
  2. Southern Chinese populations
  3. Mainland Southeast Asian populations such as Vietnamese and Thai groups
  4. Austronesian-speaking populations, including Taiwanese groups and Island Southeast Asians
  5. Korean and Japanese populations
  6. Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations in China and the Himalayas

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Asia Moderate
East Asia (Southern China & adjacent areas) Low
Island Southeast Asia & Near Oceania Low
Mainland Southeast Asia Low
Northeast Asia Low
Southern China Moderate
Island Southeast Asia and Taiwan Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~1.5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe O2A1B1A1A1A1E1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig O2A1B1A1A1A1E1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu O2A1B1A1A1A1E1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

China_LBA_EIA Chinese Henan_Wangchenggang Longsangquduo Culture Sukhbaatar Culture Vietnamese Neolithic Xiongnu
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.