Lazica/Egrisi and Nokalakevi
Egrisi / ეგრისი; Nokalakevi / ნოქალაქევი
Fortifications, churches, palatial and domestic buildings, baths, ceramics, coins, burials, and surrounding settlement evidence illuminate a western Georgian kingdom within Roman-Sasanian competition and local networks.
Éléments probants, paysages, échelle communautaire, organisation politique et connexions
Connexions montagneux, fluviales, du mar Negro, du Caspio, anatoliennes, iraniennes et des steppes
Rivers, fertile lowlands, forests, roads, mountain approaches, Black Sea connections, forts, farms, and churches supported regional power and everyday life.
Organisation politique et échelle communautaire
Kings, courts, local elites, fortified centers, churches, rural communities, soldiers, and Roman and Sasanian interests shaped changing authority and obligations.
Transformation à l'Antiquité tardive, patrimoine vivant et réception moderne
Georgian institutions and international partners steward Nokalakevi. Lazica/Egrisi history cannot adjudicate present borders, ethnic identity, or personal ancestry.
The identification is strong but should remain an evidence-based attribution rather than a timeless name.
Local rulers and communities had agency within imperial conflict.
Rural, coastal, and mountain communities require additional evidence.
Uma cronologia breve e documentada
Ces repères servent d'orientation et ne constituent pas une histoire complète.
Foyers, subsistance, travail, langue, croyances, artisanat, échange et mobilité
Langues mentionnées dans ce profil
- Kartvelian languages in regional historical context
- Greek in eastern Roman institutional and ecclesiastical use
- Middle Persian and other languages in imperial encounters
Famille linguistique: Kartvelian language history is relevant, but texts and material culture cannot assign every subject one identity
Long-running fieldwork integrates city, household, burial, and landscape evidence.
Fortifications reveal labor and conflict but not a complete social history.
The Lazic War must be read through partisan imperial authors and local archaeology.
Elite graves, fortresses, royal inscriptions, churches, palaces, imported objects, and state heritage narratives are often more visible than households, women, children, farmers, herders, fishers, craftspeople, migrants, captives, enslaved or coerced people, and rural communities. Evidence gaps must not be filled with evolutionary hierarchy, ethnic purity, foreign-founder, empty-land, lost-civilization, or simple population-replacement narratives.
Poser une question sur ce profil vérifié
Le guide peut expliquer et relier les faits déjà présents sur cette page. Il ne peut pas interroger le web ouvert, établir une identité ou une citoyenneté, ni évaluer une ascendance ou une information génétique.
AI-generated interpretation of genetic similarity, not proof of ancestry. Informational only, not professional advice.
Read full notice
Before you continue: the analysis you are about to generate is produced by an AI model. AI output can be incomplete, inaccurate, or simply wrong. It describes statistical genetic similarity to reference populations and is not proof of ancestry, ethnicity, identity, or descent. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only, and is not medical, diagnostic, genealogical, legal, or other professional advice. Do not rely on it to make health, financial, legal, or family decisions. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, DNA Genics, S.L. accepts no liability for any loss or decision arising from your use of this AI output.
Sources utilisées pour cette page
Prefer Armenian, Azerbaijani, Georgian, and other relevant national and regional heritage institutions, living-community institutions, accountable archaeological missions, peer-reviewed projects, and UNESCO records. Register inscriptions and ancient or later texts with date, genre, language, audience, and viewpoint. Do not register Wikipedia or add rock-art, cave, sacred-site, burial, artifact, or human-remains imagery without per-file licensing, attribution, access-policy, community consideration, and ethical review.
-
C1
Dmanisi Hominid Archaeological Site
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2007; current tentative-list record
-
C2
Gobustan Rock Art Cultural Landscape
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological heritage record · 2007; current record
-
C3
The Culture of Shengavit
History Museum of Armenia · National archaeological museum resource · Current museum research resource
-
C4
Areni-1 Cave
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2026; current tentative-list record
-
C5
Archaeological Collection
History Museum of Armenia · National museum archaeological collections resource · Current institutional resource
-
C6
Historical Monuments of Mtskheta
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International cultural-heritage record · 1994; current record
-
C7
Vani Archaeological Museum
Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum and site resource · Current museum resource
-
C8
Department of Ancient Archaeology
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource
-
C9
Citadel, Ancient City and Fortress Buildings of Derbent
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological and architectural heritage record · 2003; current record
-
C10
Nokalakevi Archaeological Project
Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current archaeological project resource
-
C11
Ancient Archaeology Department
Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource
-
C12
Museum Reserve Erebuni
Yerevan Municipality · Public archaeological museum resource · Current municipal museum directory
-
S1
Nokalakevi Archaeological Project
Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current project resource
-
S2
Nokalakevi Museum-Reserve and archaeological collections
Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum resource · Current institutional resource
-
S3
Late antique archaeology in Georgia
University of Cambridge Department of Archaeology · University archaeological research resource · Current university research directory
Revisión editorial: 5 août 2026