Bosumpra and Kwahu plant-work histories
No ancient self-designation is inferred from this research label or modern place name.
The national inventory identifies Bosumpra as an archaeological context rather than a living ethnic classification. The plant study distinguishes long-lived wild plant use from later evidence for crops. The 2017 reassessment discusses a longer sequence than the previously investigated upper deposits.
Foyers, paysages, institutions et éléments probants
Fleuves, environnements et connexions régionales
Abetifi is a modern orientation for the named context. No territorial extent or automatic continuity is inferred. Household and shelter evidence does not supply a centralized authority for the Kwahu Plateau.
Organisation politique et échelle communautaire
Household and shelter evidence does not supply a centralized authority for the Kwahu Plateau.
Transformation ultérieure, patrimoine vivant et réception moderne
Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority. Later research and interpretation are dated separately below. Archaeological plant categories cannot identify every resident's language. The atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent or membership.
Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of the registered source, not author or community endorsement; retain the stated sample and chronological limits.
Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of the registered source, not author or community endorsement; retain the stated sample and chronological limits.
Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of the registered source, not author or community endorsement; retain the stated sample and chronological limits.
Uma cronologia breve e documentada
Ces repères servent d'orientation et ne constituent pas une histoire complète.
-
Long occupation question
The reassessment separates earlier background from the main Holocene record.
Alimentation, artisanat, travail, apprentissage et croyances
Langues mentionnées dans ce profil
- Archaeological plant categories cannot identify every resident's language.
Famille linguistique: Language, script, archaeological style and political affiliation are distinct; this selected evidence does not classify every resident.
The national inventory identifies Bosumpra as an archaeological context rather than a living ethnic classification.
The plant study distinguishes long-lived wild plant use from later evidence for crops.
The 2017 reassessment discusses a longer sequence than the previously investigated upper deposits.
Material evidence and transmitted accounts require context; no artifact, manuscript, ancestral-remains or sacred-site imagery is reproduced.
Independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted educational summaries, not reproductions of the cited works or professional scholarly review. Cited communities, museums, researchers, universities, heritage authorities, UNESCO and publishers did not author or endorse this atlas. Names identify sources only; no logos, source imagery, human remains, restricted cultural expressions or sensitive coordinates are reproduced. Public availability does not establish cultural consent. Use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.
Poser une question sur ce profil vérifié
Le guide peut expliquer et relier les faits déjà présents sur cette page. Il ne peut pas interroger le web ouvert, établir une identité ou une citoyenneté, ni évaluer une ascendance ou une information génétique.
AI-generated interpretation of genetic similarity, not proof of ancestry. Informational only, not professional advice.
Read full notice
Before you continue: the analysis you are about to generate is produced by an AI model. AI output can be incomplete, inaccurate, or simply wrong. It describes statistical genetic similarity to reference populations and is not proof of ancestry, ethnicity, identity, or descent. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only, and is not medical, diagnostic, genealogical, legal, or other professional advice. Do not rely on it to make health, financial, legal, or family decisions. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, DNA Genics, S.L. accepts no liability for any loss or decision arising from your use of this AI output.
Sources utilisées pour cette page
Prefer national heritage institutions, accountable archaeological projects, academic editions, original studies and living community knowledge in its authorized context. Identify institutional summaries, repository abstracts, preliminary reports, older colonial research, advisory evaluations and tentative nominations rather than treating them as independent excavation confirmation. Attribute chronology, composition date, genre, audience and viewpoint. Public access is not permission to reproduce source images, archives or restricted knowledge.
-
C1
Human interactions with tropical environments over the last 14,000 years at Iho Eleru, Nigeria
Cerasoni and colleagues; iScience; PubMed research record · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2023
-
C2
Optical and thermoluminescence dating of Middle Stone Age and Kintampo bearing sediments at Birimi, a multi-component archaeological site in Ghana
Quickert, Godfrey-Smith and Casey; Quaternary Science Reviews · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2003
-
C3
10,000 year history of plant use at Bosumpra Cave, Ghana
Oas, D’Andrea and Watson; University of Ghana repository; Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2015
-
C4
To Timbuktu From A Land Far Away: Migrating Manuscripts
Ali Diakité and Paul Naylor; Hill Museum & Manuscript Library · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2025-01-30
-
C5
Learning From Our Past
University of Victoria; community-linked educational publication · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2023
-
C6
Banda Through Time
University of Victoria Libraries; Banda Heritage Initiative · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20
-
C7
Site archéologique de Bura
Niger State Party; UNESCO tentative-list record · Tentative nomination, not World Heritage inscription · 2006
-
C8
The Oudierin Drainage Archaeological Project: New Perspectives on the Saloum Delta Shell Middens (Senegal)
Original archaeological project; African Archaeological Review; PMC · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2022
-
C9
Early Oyo History Reconsidered
Babatunde A. Agiri; History in Africa 2, 1–16; Cambridge University Press · Original historical study; oral-tradition and chronology critique · 1975; online edition 2014
-
C10
St. George’s Castle (Elmina Castle), Elmina (1482)
Ghana Museums and Monuments Board · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20
-
C11
Bibliothèque de Manuscrits al-Imam Essayouti
Hill Museum & Manuscript Library · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20
-
S1
Archaeological Sites and other sites of historical-cultural relevance to Ghana
Ghana Museums and Monuments Board · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20
-
S2
10,000 year history of plant use at Bosumpra Cave, Ghana
Oas, D’Andrea and Watson; University of Ghana repository; Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2015
-
S3
Bosumpra revisited: 12,500 years on the Kwahu Plateau, Ghana, as viewed from ‘On top of the hill’
Derek Watson; Azania · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2017
Revisión editorial: 20 octobre 2026