Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO195
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Neolithic-Bronze Age era

NEO195
4048 BCE - 3770 BCE
Male
Volosovo culture
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO195

Date Range

4048 BCE - 3770 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U5a2d

Y-DNA Haplogroup

I-S21825

Cultural Period

Volosovo culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Sakhtysh-2a (Ivanovo Oblast, Teykovsky District, Sakhtysh Village)
Coordinates 56.7840, 40.4487
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO195 4048 BCE - 3770 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Volosovo culture represents a fascinating period of the Forest Neolithic around the mid-3rd to the beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE, primarily located in the central and northern regions of European Russia, including areas northeast of Moscow and extending into the regions surrounding the Kama and Oka rivers. This culture is part of the larger continuum of the Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe that developed in response to local environmental conditions and interactions with neighboring groups.

Geographic Context and Environment

The Volosovo culture thrived in a dense forest zone characterized by rich natural resources, including an abundance of rivers and lakes that supported fishing and provided a plethora of resources. The climatic conditions of the Forest Neolithic fostered an economy heavily reliant on hunting, gathering, and fishing. The people of the Volosovo culture adapted well to this environment, utilizing the available resources to sustain their communities and developing sophisticated methods to exploit their surroundings.

Settlement Patterns

Settlements of the Volosovo culture were typically situated near rivers, lakes, or other freshwater sources, providing easy access to fishing and transportation routes. These sites were often strategically chosen for their defensive advantages as well as their resource availability. The settlements consisted of semi-subterranean dwellings, which provided insulation against the harsh weather conditions of the region. These structures were often organized in small hamlets or villages, featuring communal spaces that suggest a level of social organization.

Material Culture

The material culture of the Volosovo people was notably rich and diverse, with a strong emphasis on pottery that distinguished them from neighboring cultures. Volosovo pottery is characterized by its intricate designs and forms, often decorated with comb and pit impressions, and sometimes with zoomorphic motifs. This pottery indicates both an aesthetic sensibility and a practical approach to everyday tools, as ceramics were essential for storage and cooking.

Stone and bone tools were predominant, including polished stone axes, knives, scrapers, and fishing implements. The presence of these tools shows a high level of craftsmanship and adaptation to the forest environment. The Volosovo culture also exhibited a significant proficiency in working with amber, a valuable resource in the region, crafting intricate beads and adornments indicating both trade and a thriving cultural identity.

Subsistence and Economy

Subsistence strategies were primarily based on a combination of hunting, fishing, and gathering. The extensive river networks provided ample opportunities for gathering fish, while the surrounding forests were rich with game such as elk, deer, and wild boar. The Volosovo people were skilled hunters and fishers, utilizing boats, nets, traps, and weirs to maximize their catch. Foraging for wild plants, berries, and nuts supplemented their diet, reflecting an economy well-adapted to the natural environment.

Social and Ritual Life

The social structure of the Volosovo culture likely revolved around kin-based groups, with evidence suggesting some degree of social stratification. Ritualistic and spiritual practices, while not entirely understood, are inferred from burial sites and associated grave goods. Burials often included pottery, stone tools, and personal ornaments, indicating beliefs in an afterlife and the significance of the individual.

Interaction with Other Cultures

The Volosovo culture had interactions with neighboring cultures, facilitated by the interconnected river systems. These interactions likely included trade, as indicated by the distribution of amber and other artifacts unique to the Volosovo region appearing in distant locales. Such exchanges would have fostered both cultural diffusion and technological exchange, contributing to the culture's development and adaptation over time.

Conclusion

In summary, the Volosovo culture represents a dynamic and adaptable Neolithic society that thrived in the forests of Eastern Europe. Their sophisticated material culture, adept utilization of the environment, and social organization provide valuable insights into the broader development of prehistoric societies in the region. Through ongoing archaeological study, the Volosovo people continue to offer a critical understanding of the complex interplay between environment, culture, and technology during this pivotal era in human history.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26