Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I12955
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Mongolia in the Middle Late Bronze Age era

I12955
1949 BCE - 1774 BCE
Male
Middle Bronze Age Munkhkhairkhan 1, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I12955

Date Range

1949 BCE - 1774 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

D4i

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N1a1a1-CTS7728

Cultural Period

Middle Bronze Age Munkhkhairkhan 1, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Zavkhan. Bayantes sum. Khukh Khushoony bom. Barrow 3
Coordinates 49.7000, 96.8000
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I12955 1949 BCE - 1774 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Middle Bronze Age in Central Asia, including regions like the Munkhkhairkhan area of Mongolia, represents a fascinating period characterized by the nomadic pastoralist cultures that roamed the Eurasian steppes. This era, typically dated around 2000 to 1500 BCE, was marked by significant developments in social organization, economy, and technology, which collectively influenced the broader trajectory of Central Asian history.

Geography and Environment

Munkhkhairkhan, situated in western Mongolia, features a diverse landscape comprising rugged mountains, expansive steppes, and arid deserts. This varied geography played a crucial role in shaping the lifestyle of its inhabitants, who were predominantly nomadic pastoralists. The region's climate, with harsh winters and limited rainfall, necessitated a mobile way of life centered around grazing livestock.

Social Structure and Lifestyle

The nomadic pastoralist communities of the Middle Bronze Age were organized into clans or tribes, with social structures typically revolving around kinship ties. Leadership was often informal, relying on consensus, though some groups may have had chieftains or elders who played roles in decision-making.

The mobility of these groups was essential for following seasonal pasturelands for their herds, which typically included sheep, goats, horses, and cattle. This itinerant lifestyle was both a response to and a necessity given the environmental conditions. The movement patterns were not random but rather strategic, with established routes and territories recognized and respected by different groups.

Economy and Livelihood

The economy was primarily based on pastoralism, with animal husbandry providing the main source of sustenance. Meat, milk, and hides from livestock were staples, while secondary products like wool were important for clothing and shelter, and also served as trade commodities.

Trade and exchange played a crucial role in this period, particularly along nascent trade networks across the steppes. These networks facilitated the exchange of goods such as metals, textiles, and other necessities, linking various pastoral groups and even reaching settled agricultural societies to the south and west.

Technology and Innovations

Technological advancements in this era included the adoption and refinement of metalworking skills. Bronze tools and weapons became increasingly prevalent, indicating not only technological prowess but also growing engagement in interregional exchange networks as tin and copper, the components of bronze, were not locally available in all areas.

The use of wheeled vehicles, particularly chariots, and the domestication of horses were transformative developments of the era. Horses, pivotal for movement and military prowess, became integral to pastoralist life, enhancing both mobility and trade.

Cultural and Spiritual Life

The spiritual beliefs of the Middle Bronze Age nomads likely involved a mix of animist and shamanistic practices, with reverence for natural elements such as mountains, rivers, and celestial bodies. Evidence of these beliefs can be found in petroglyphs and stone monuments scattered across the steppes, which depict animals and suggest ritualistic activities.

Burial practices also offer insights into their culture, with kurgans (mound graves) indicating social stratification and possibly involving complex funerary rituals. These burial sites often contain artifacts like pottery, weapons, and ornaments, reflecting both the material culture and the beliefs associated with the afterlife.

Interactions and Legacy

The Middle Bronze Age nomadic cultures of Central Asia, including those in the Munkhkhairkhan region, were integral to the cultural and economic exchanges across the Eurasian landmass. Their interactions with neighboring sedentary cultures facilitated the spread of technologies, ideas, and goods, contributing to the cultural mosaic that characterized ancient Central Asia.

The legacy of these cultures is evident in the way they adapted to their harsh environments, developed complex social networks, and laid the foundations for future nomadic empires, such as the Xiongnu and the Mongols. Their practices and innovations would continue to influence the cultural and historical trajectories of Central Asia for centuries to come.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27