Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I12976
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Mongolia in the Middle Late Bronze Age era

I12976
1441 BCE - 1304 BCE
Male
Late Bronze Age Mongun-Taiga 3, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I12976

Date Range

1441 BCE - 1304 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U2e2a1a2

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N1a-M2114

Cultural Period

Late Bronze Age Mongun-Taiga 3, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Bayan-Ulgii aimag. Ulaankhus sum. Kulala Ula barrow 2
Coordinates 49.3590, 88.7130
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I12976 1441 BCE - 1304 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Late Bronze Age Mongun-Taiga 3 culture, situated in the Eurasian Steppe, specifically in present-day Mongolia, represents a fascinating period characterized by a blend of nomadic pastoralism, complex social structures, and interactions across vast distances. This era, typically dated between the 13th and 9th centuries BCE, saw the rise of distinct cultural practices that were influenced by environmental, social, and technological changes.

Geography and Environment

The Mongun-Taiga region lies at the intersection of several ecological zones - steppe, taiga, and mountainous regions. This diverse environment fostered a lifestyle that was both dynamic and adaptable. The harsh climates of the steppes and mountains dictated a nomadic way of life, where communities moved frequently in search of grazing lands for their herds and to escape the severe continental winters.

Economic Activities

The primary economic activity of the Late Bronze Age Mongun-Taiga 3 culture was pastoralism. Herding cattle, sheep, goats, and horses provided the community with essential resources: meat, milk, hides, and transportation. The horse, in particular, played a crucial role beyond mere transportation; it was central to military, trade, and cultural life. The domestication and breeding of horses during this period are believed to have been among the key innovations that facilitated the rise of mobile societies across the Eurasian Steppe.

Social Structure

Social organization during this period was likely complex and hierarchical, though inherently different from sedentary civilizations. Power and prestige were often linked to wealth in livestock, with tribal leaders or chieftains holding significant influence. The social structure might have also been influenced by alliances and kinship ties. Evidence from kurgans (burial mounds) suggests that elites were buried with rich grave goods, indicating their high status within the society.

Culture and Artifacts

Cultural practices within the Mongun-Taiga 3 are reflected in the material artifacts discovered in archaeological sites. Pottery from this era, although not as elaborate as in other contemporary sedentary cultures, served both functional and ritual purposes. Metallurgy saw significant advances, with bronze becoming a crucial material for tools, weapons, and ornaments. The craftsmanship of bronze items demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of mining and smelting techniques.

Burial Practices

Burial sites provide key insights into the Mongun-Taiga 3 culture. Kurgans, often monumental in scale, served as tombs for the elite. The goods buried with individuals - such as weapons, ornaments, and occasionally horse remains - suggest beliefs in an afterlife where such items would be needed. These burials not only denote social stratification but also reveal cultural exchanges, as some artifacts show influences from neighboring cultures and distant regions.

Interaction and Trade

The Mongun-Taiga 3 culture was not isolated. The Eurasian Steppe served as a conduit for the exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies between East and West. The culture engaged in long-distance trade, evident from the artifacts that have origins in faraway regions, such as Central Asia, Siberia, and even the early Chinese dynasties. This exchange facilitated cultural diffusion and may have contributed to the technological and cultural advancements observed in this period.

Conclusion

The Late Bronze Age Mongun-Taiga 3 culture of Mongolia epitomizes the adaptability and resilience of nomadic societies in the ancient world. Through their pastoral lifestyle, social organization, and interactions with neighboring cultures, they played a crucial role in the development of the broader Eurasian cultural landscape. Their legacy can be traced in the evolution of subsequent nomadic cultures that would eventually shape the course of history across Central Asia and beyond.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26