Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13173
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Mongolia in the Middle Late Bronze Age era

I13173
1876 BCE - 1690 BCE
Male
Middle Bronze Age Munkhkhairkhan 2, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13173

Date Range

1876 BCE - 1690 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

H15b1

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N-M231

Cultural Period

Middle Bronze Age Munkhkhairkhan 2, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Khovd. Munkhkhairkhan sum. Ulaan goviin uzuur barrow 2
Coordinates 47.0474, 91.8396
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13173 1876 BCE - 1690 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Middle Bronze Age period in Mongolia, specifically the Munkhkhairkhan culture of the Eurasian Steppe, represents a fascinating era marked by complex social dynamics, evolving technological advancements, and extensive interplay among various cultural groups inhabiting the region. During this time, roughly dating from around 2000 to 1500 BCE, the inhabitants of Mongolia and the surrounding steppe areas were largely pastoral communities whose livelihoods depended on herding and managing livestock such as sheep, goats, cattle, and horses.

Geographical Setting

The Eurasian Steppe is a vast expanse of grassland stretching from Eastern Europe through Central Asia to Mongolia and northern China. Within this context, Munkhkhairkhan is located in western Mongolia, characterized by its rugged landscapes, mountain ranges, open steppe, and semi-arid climate. This environment played a critical role in shaping the culture and lifestyle of its inhabitants.

Social Structure and Lifestyle

The Middle Bronze Age societies in Mongolia were predominantly nomadic or semi-nomadic pastoralists. The people of Munkhkhairkhan likely organized themselves into tribal groups or clans, with social structures grounded in kinship and familial ties. Mobility was a key component of their lifestyle, dictated by the need to find fresh pastures for grazing and sources of water.

The concept of wealth was intricately linked to the size and health of one's herd, which not only provided sustenance but also defined social class and power within these communities. Settlements, when established, were typically temporary and constructed from light materials that could be easily dismantled.

Economy and Trade

Economic activities of this era involved herding, with a primary emphasis on sheep and goats which were able to thrive in the variable climate. From these animals, communities obtained wool, meat, and milk products, which formed the staple of their diet and clothing needs.

Trade also played a significant role, facilitated by the extensive network across the steppe. The Munkhkhairkhan culture likely engaged in exchanging goods such as furs, livestock, and crafted items with neighboring groups, contributing to a wider cultural exchange across the region. This proto-silk-road would eventually pave the way for more formal trade routes in the succeeding centuries.

Technological Developments

Technological advancements during this era were significant. The Middle Bronze Age saw improvements in metalworking techniques, particularly with bronze, which was used for creating tools, weapons, and ornaments. This era marked the increased refinement of metal smelting processes, which was critical for producing more durable and effective implements.

Horse-riding is believed to have gradually integrated into the cultural fabric of the Munkhkhairkhan people, as horses provided a strategic advantage in terms of mobility and herding efficiency. Additionally, they started using chariots, enhancing their capabilities in both warfare and transport.

Cultural and Religious Practices

Cultural life in the Middle Bronze Age is less documented and requires inferential understanding based on archaeological finds. Burial sites, often featuring kurgans (large burial mounds), provide insight into the rituals and beliefs of the time. These sites suggest a belief in an afterlife, with graves containing items such as food offerings, weapons, and personal adornments indicating a culture of respect and honor for the deceased.

Petroglyphs and rock carvings discovered in areas like Munkhkhairkhan may provide clues about the cosmological beliefs and artistic expressions of these ancient people. Animal motifs often depicted in these petroglyphs suggest a deep spiritual or symbolic connection to the wildlife and domestic animals that were central to their survival and culture.

Interactions with Other Cultures

The Munkhkhairkhan culture existed during a time of significant movement and interaction between various cultural groups across the Eurasian Steppe. This period likely saw exchanges not only of goods but also of ideas, leading to a mingling of religious practices, technological innovations, and cultural traditions.

The Middle Bronze Age marked a significant era in the Eurasian Steppe region, balancing between traditional pastoral life and emerging complexities of social and technological innovations. Munkhkhairkhan, as part of this broader context, illustrates the adaptability and resilience of human societies in one of the world's most challenging and dynamic landscapes.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27