Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13178
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Mongolia in the Early Iron Age era

I13178
1046 BCE - 914 BCE
Female
Early Iron Age Slab Grave Culture 1, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13178

Date Range

1046 BCE - 914 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

R

Cultural Period

Early Iron Age Slab Grave Culture 1, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Khentii. Bayan-Adraga sum. Shuusyn boom Tomb 6
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13178 1046 BCE - 914 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Iron Age Slab Grave Culture of Mongolia represents a fascinating and significant phase in the cultural and historical development of the nomadic steppe societies. Spanning approximately from the late Bronze Age into the early Iron Age, roughly 1300 to 300 BCE, this era is characterized by its unique burial practices, economic strategies, and the formation of early nomadic confederations. The Slab Grave Culture is particularly noteworthy for its role in setting the stage for the rise of later, more prominently documented nomadic empires like the Xiongnu.

Geographical Context: The Slab Grave Culture is situated within the broader expanse of the Mongolian Steppe, a vast area of grasslands that extends across present-day Mongolia, southern Siberia, and parts of northern China. This region's harsh climate and open landscapes dictated the nomadic lifestyle, reliant on extensive networks of mobility and pastoralism.

Burial Practices: The most distinguishable feature of the Slab Grave Culture is its burial sites, which involve slab gravestones, hence the name. These graves are typically rectangular pits lined and covered with large stone slabs. The dead were often buried in a supine position, with the graves oriented towards the southeast. These graves can often contain one or more skeletons, with inclusion of various grave goods such as pottery, weaponry, ornaments, and tools, indicating a belief in an afterlife and the importance of personal belongings. The variation in grave offerings also suggests a social hierarchy and differences in status among individuals.

Economy and Subsistence: Economically, the people of the Slab Grave Culture were predominantly pastoralists, herding animals such as horses, sheep, goats, and cattle. The mobility afforded by a nomadic lifestyle allowed them to effectively exploit the seasonal availability of pastures and water sources. While the region's climate and soil limited extensive agricultural practices, there is evidence that they engaged in some small-scale farming, supplemented by hunting and gathering.

Societal Structure: The Slab Grave Culture demonstrates early forms of societal organization that likely paved the way for more complex social and political structures. The emergence of distinct social classes is probable, as inferred from variations in grave goods and tomb constructions. These societies were likely organized into small tribal units or clans, which could form larger confederations. Leadership roles may have been hereditary or acquired through demonstrated skill or bravery, particularly in warfare.

Technological Advancements: The transition to the Iron Age brought about significant technological advancements. The use of iron for tools and weaponry represented a notable evolution from the preceding Bronze Age, offering improved efficiency in both agricultural practices and warfare. The introduction and refinement of horse riding also transformed mobility and military tactics, contributing to the socio-political dynamics of the steppe.

Cultural Interactions: The Slab Grave Culture did not develop in isolation. There were interactions with neighboring cultures and regions, resulting in exchange and influence. Contacts with settled civilizations in Central Asia and China through trade or conflict may have introduced new goods, ideas, and technologies, further facilitating the cultural dynamism of the Slab Grave peoples.

Legacy: The Slab Grave Culture laid critical foundations for the evolution of future nomadic confederations. Their adaptation strategies, social organization, and mobility set precedents for the sophisticated nomadic empires that later dominated the steppes, such as the Xiongnu and, ultimately, the Mongol Empire under Genghis Khan.

In studying the Slab Grave Culture, researchers gain nuanced insights into the early development of nomadic societies on the Eurasian steppe, revealing how these communities adapted to and thrived in a challenging environment, shaping the historical narratives of Inner Asia.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26