Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13698
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Mongolia in the Neolithic era

I13698
5621 BCE - 5482 BCE
Male
Neolithic Northern Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13698

Date Range

5621 BCE - 5482 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

F1b1-a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

C2a1a1-Z18161

Cultural Period

Neolithic Northern Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Bulgan. Khutag-Undur sum. Egiin-gol river valley. Marzyn Khutul. tomb 1-055-1. skeleton 2
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13698 5621 BCE - 5482 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Neolithic era in Northern Mongolia, which overlaps with the southern edge of Siberia, is a fascinating period marked by significant transitions in human history. This time frame, typically dated between 7000 and 3000 BCE, represents the gradual shift from a nomadic hunting and gathering lifestyle to more settled agricultural and pastoral communities. Although detailed records from this specific time and place are sparse, archaeologists and anthropologists have pieced together a general understanding of the culture and life during this period based on material evidence and comparisons with neighboring regions.

Geography and Environment

During the Neolithic period, Northern Mongolia and the southern Siberian expanse experienced a range of climatic conditions. The environment included a mix of forested areas, grasslands (or steppe), and mountainous regions. This diverse landscape fostered a variety of flora and fauna, presenting both challenges and opportunities for human habitation. The region's rivers and lakes provided water resources, supported fish populations, and served as natural travel routes, which played crucial roles in the development of Neolithic communities.

Society and Lifestyle

The societies of Neolithic Northern Mongolia were primarily comprised of small, kin-based groups. As people began to settle in semi-permanent or permanent locations, these communities developed more complex social structures compared to their Paleolithic predecessors. Tribal organization and kinship ties likely played a pivotal role in social cohesion and resource management.

Subsistence and Economy: The economy in this era was characterized by a mix of hunting and gathering along with the nascent stages of farming and animal domestication. The Mongolian steppes became increasingly prominent for pastoralism, particularly involving the management of reindeer, sheep, goats, and cattle. Agricultural practices likely included the cultivation of hardy cereals and other native plants, adapted to the region's climatic conditions.

Tools and Technology: Neolithic communities in Northern Mongolia utilized a variety of stone tools, which were often polished and refined compared to earlier Paleolithic implements. Tools such as blades, arrowheads, axes, and scrapers indicate advancements in hunting techniques and agricultural practices. Ceramics also became widespread during this period, with pottery used for the storage and cooking of food, signifying a shift towards more settled lifestyles.

Cultural Practices

Art and cultural expression during the Neolithic period in this region could be inferred through petroglyphs and megalithic structures, which reflect symbolic and perhaps religious activities. The monumental structures such as stone circles or mounds might have served ceremonial purposes or acted as territorial markers or astrological instruments.

Burial practices provide further insights into the spiritual and cultural life. Neolithic burials often contained grave goods such as tools, pottery, and ornaments, suggesting beliefs in an afterlife, ancestor worship, or a ritualistic honoring of the dead.

Interactions and Influence

Northern Mongolia's proximity to Siberia implies a degree of cultural exchange and influence with neighboring regions. Trade networks likely facilitated the dissemination of ideas, materials, and technologies. During this period, interactions with other Siberian cultures and even broader Eurasian communities would have played roles in the diffusion of domestication practices, metallurgical experimentation, and artistic styles.

Conclusion

The Neolithic period in Northern Mongolia is characterized by dynamic changes and adaptations. As societies transitioned from mobile groups to semi-sedentary or sedentary communities, they forged new relationships with their environment, developed complex social practices, and laid the groundwork for the subsequent cultural developments in the Bronze Age. While current understanding is continually refined with ongoing archaeological work, this era remains a testament to human resilience and innovation in a challenging and diverse landscape.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26